midGRAY

The level of gaslighting and semantics here is actually insane. "I never said Erika Kirk was at the alleged assassination meeting." Now that Candace realizes Mitch Snow's testimony is completely falling apart under scrutiny and that he's a shitty human being who she raised 150k for, she's changing her tone REALLY FAST about the implications behind what she recklessly platformed and allowed him to say to millions of people. "I've always said we can't rely on Mitch's memory" and (along the lines) "I'm now trying to debunk Mitch and provide an alibi for the people he's accused, so we can move on." That's not how it works and that's not the impression her fans were under, and everyone knows it. Why, also, when I say the same thing about Mitch's reliability and credibility, do I get called a "pedophile fed who got the call from TPUSA." Why when I say we shouldn't rely on baseless claims am I crucified and td by Candace not to look into his past and focus on what he alleges? Notice, when she allowed Mitch to initially say he believes he saw Erika at the hotel lobby near Fort Huachuca (to imply she could have been in on the alleged assassination meeting), she IMMEDIATELY distances herself from it. It's also not my job, or anyone else's, to debunk Mitch's ridiculous claims. They were ALWAYS ridiculous and allowing him to EVER make such reckless claims without more behind the scenes investigation was disgusting and wrong. That's not bad journalism. It's retardation that will likely backfire. Candace can only get by with her "technicalities" and word play/phrasing for so long. Many fall for the gaslighting when she tries to mince her words and re-explain herself after getting proven wrong. Plausible deniability will get you so far with this one. The reality is, nothing Mitch Snow has alleged about who he saw has been proven. It can not be because it didn't happen. Yes, he was there. Nobody is disputing that. But, it is not up to Erika Kirk, or Dan Flood, or Rep Amoedi, or Cabot Phillips to vindicate themselves over baseless smears. Also, strongly implying that their "silence" relates to guilt is vile. "I don't know why they can't just say where they were to vindicate themselves and we can move on." They don't owe anyone jack shit. Especially with something as stupid as this. That's not how accusations work in a court of law. You prove guilt with evidence, photos, and facts, not baseless "Me Too" style accusations. This whole Mitch Snow story is a mess and only the gullible are still eating it up. This space was damage control. I will get no apologies when it's all said and done for the character assassination and irreparable slander I've endured for telling you all the truth from the beginning. That's the worst part. It will be "well guys, we hit a dead end here. Sometimes that happens. Ive got things wrong along the way and our investigation continues" despite the vile hatred that has been spewed from her fans against everyone who called it from the beginning with 5 seconds of research into Mitch and some common sense. Loving my vacation by the way, I'm in the hottub currently. 😎

Elon Musk Did NOT Save InfoWars! He Simply Protected X, Formerly Twitter, From an Attempted Democrat Party Takeover That Sought to Steal the Identities of X Users and Operate on the Platform as Them

The Kirk Widow is having the best time of her life