Project Constitution

This all proves that authenticity is not missed by the people. Audiences are smart. It's time to review the current Charlie Kirk show too. It is becoming increasingly tasteless and anathema to Charlies objectives and true legacy. @RealCandaceO

TPUSA’S ADVISORY COUNCIL INCLUDES PAUL E. VALLELY, WHO CO-AUTHORED WITH MICHAEL A. AQUINO IN 1980: “From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory” 👉ia800109.us.archive.org/14/items/pdfy-… Paul E. Vallely’s role at TPUSA is framed around his military and national security credentials. In 1980, Vallely was commander of a PSYOP unit and Aquino was a PSYOP analyst. Aquino was a Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserve specializing in psychological operations and military intelligence. He founded the Temple of Set, a religious organization that emerged from a split with the Church of Satan. Aquino’s Satanist identity was public and self-declared — not an accusation, but a documented fact about his own religious founding. Vallely says he was unaware of Aquino’s occult practices at that time. But here’s my question: Did concepts explicitly articulated by a Satanist as tools of influence and domination — framing Satan as an archetype of psychological domination succeeding through persuasion, deception, and manipulation of belief — migrate into contemporary political practice through MindWar, without disclosure, examination, or repudiation? Take a look: open.substack.com/pub/laissezfai… Yes, having PsyOp credentials and having worked alongside a Satanist doesn’t mean Vallely is applying that knowledge at @TPUSA — but we can’t know for certain. So, I wanted to share this.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ @RealCandaceO @CandaceOwensPod @baroncoleman @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @IanCarrollShow @laralogan @jimmy_dore @JohnMappin @ImMappin @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @FLOTUS @SLOTUS @EricTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr @LaraLeaTrump #AmericaFirst #CharlieKirk #ErikaKirk #Christian

‼️THE UNTOUCHABLE WIDOW? Erika Kirk's CREEPY Instagram Post They Wan't YOU To Forget! 🧐 This image of Erika Kirk and her daughter, originally posted on March 11, 2024, has become a flashpoint for every "Truth Seeker" in the Charlie Kirk case. While the media paints a picture of a grieving widow, the timeline and the optics tell a different story to those who are actually paying attention. This post went up exactly 6 months before the UVU event. Looking back at her feed from early 2024, the "family-first" branding was being dialed up to 100 just as Charlie was shifting his views on the "Foreign Nexus" and the neocon donor class. By positioning herself and her child as the ultimate symbols of untouchable grief, Erika is attempting to weaponize our empathy. She is wielding her identity as a widow and mother in a calculated maneuver. Using her kids as a shield to SHAME and silence anyone asking legitimate questions about the security failures, the grounded drones, and the TPUSA finances at the time of Charlie’s assassination. Let’s never forget the history of this phrase in this exact context. Charlie Kirk himself used the phrase EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL just months before he was killed while describing the pressure being put on him behind the scenes by Zionist neocon donors. He was being emotionally blackmailed to abandon "America First" principles, to remove figures like Tucker Carlson from TPUSA events, and to fall back into line with the same neocon establishment that legacy media outlets (like Bari Weiss’s "Town Hall" and CBS) are currently protecting. Using her daughter as a prop to shut down investigative journalism is the oldest trick in the book. If you care about your daughter’s future, wouldn't you want to know if the "Foreign Nexus" was involved in her father's death? The legacy media calls it "peddling conspiracies." We call it NOTICING. We aren't going to stop asking questions. We aren't going to accept a scripted PR narrative over the undeniable anomalies of that day. Erika Kirk can use whatever shield she chooses, but Remember "Truth" doesn't need a PR firm to protect it. Shoutout to @CharlotteLee_88 FOLLOW Her!

@alexbronzini IDK these seem like really solid numbers on his overall show. Very few YouTubers can reach this level of viewership consistently

Branding Bad Now? This post suggests @RealCandaceO is bad and/or a narcissist of some sort because she wears branded merchandise on her show? Of all the things to criticize, this might be one of the weakest I've seen. Branded merchandise for the purpose of marketing and sales has existed for nearly all prominent public figures since forever, but Candace does it and we ask what I assume is a rhetorical question to suggest she's doing anything different than anyone else? Would you criticize a person you like for doing the same? What even is this? I don't think anyone, Candace included, is above criticism. But this is one of many weak suggestions that just seems like a reach.

🚨 BREAKING: We FOUND the Romanian Orphan Girl Erika Kirk (Frantzve) Posted in 2013… Then Suspiciously DELETED 👀 Back in May 2013, influencer Erika Frantzve (now Kirk) posted this heartbreaking photo on Instagram: A little Romanian girl, maybe 6-8 years old, standing in what looks like an orphanage room. Green shirt, pink pants, a stuffed pink parrot on her shoulder, cardboard box in front of her. Caption: “I have something special for you… very special…” The post blew up… and then it vanished. Deleted without explanation. No archive, no follow-up, nothing. For the last 7 months, people have been wondering: Who was that girl? What really happened to her? Well… we found her. After digging through old screenshots, reverse image search, and public social media, we matched her to this girl — now a young woman who just graduated high school in 2024. Here’s why this is a STRONG, almost undeniable match (not just “kinda looks similar” — this is forensic-level facial consistency): Facial Feature Breakdown (permanent bone structure doesn’t lie): Eyes: Large, dark brown, wide-set, rounded shape with the exact same upper lid hooding and prominent eyelids. Identical in the 2013 photo, her childhood pics (purple tank top, pink skirt, headband), and even her recent selfies. Nose: Small, straight bridge with that soft, rounded tip. Matches perfectly across every photo from 2013 to 2024. Mouth & Smile: Small-to-medium lips, slight overbite, same upper teeth show when smiling. You can see the exact same smile in the orphanage pic, the swing set photos, the kitchen tutu shot, and her high-school grad selfies. Face Shape & Hairline: Soft rounded child face in 2013 that lengthened exactly as expected into the oval/heart-shaped teen face by 2024. Blunt straight-across bangs + straight dark brown hair in almost ALL her childhood photos — the signature look from the original post. Overall Proportions: Same slim build, leg-to-torso ratio, cheek-to-jaw transition through puberty. Timeline & Romanian Proof: The original photo is from Erika’s “Romanian Angels” charity project around 2012-2013 in Romania (specifically tied to orphanages in the Constanța area). This girl was living in Romania at that exact time. Multiple childhood photos show her in traditional Romanian folk costumes (one even tagged with the 🇷🇴 flag emoji and “Outfit Inspo”). Overlay text in her old videos: “There’s still a young girl from Romania.” Age lines up perfectly: ~6-8 in 2013 → high school graduation in 2024 (born ~2005-2007). This isn’t some random lookalike. These are the same eyes, same nose, same smile, same bangs, same Romanian orphan story. So here’s the part that should have everyone asking questions: Why did Erika Kirk delete that specific post? Why has she never followed up on “her” special little Romanian Angel? Why the sudden silence around the entire Romanian Angels project? Online chatter has been swirling for years, allegations of trafficking with the charity, claims of missing children from the Constanța orphanage, whispers that she was eventually banned from Romania, questions about where all these “angels” actually ended up. Was this little girl part of some bigger story? Was the post deleted because someone realized the trail could lead back to her? Or was there something about this specific child that made Erika scrub her from the internet? We’re not accusing anyone of anythin. But when a public figure posts a vulnerable orphan child with a dramatic caption, gets massive attention, then quietly erases the evidence while the internet is still talking about “Romanian Angels” conspiracies… it raises red flags. This girl is safe, grown, and thriving now (looks like she’s now in the US). But the questions remain: What was Erika Kirk really doing in Romania? Why delete the proof? What is she trying to hide? Drop this in the comments, tag everyone you know, and share this far and wide. The internet has a long memory — and we just connected the dots. If you have more info, screenshots, or leads — comment below, DM me or email and let’s get answers. CC: @RealCandaceO

@RealCandaceO Works for me! Thank you for the direct link! CIK 🙏🏼

‼️BOMBSHELL: Same Law Firm Harpole Uses AGAINST Candace Employs Ben Shapiro’s Brother-in-Law & Is OWNED By Trump DOJ Insider! 👀 The rabbit hole just got a lot deeper. If you were wondering why Brian Harpole’s lawsuit against Candace Owens felt like a coordinated strike, the legal "family tree" behind it tells the whole story. 1. The DOJ Connection: Brian Harpole’s lead attorney, Zachary Stoner, works for the Dhillon Law Group. The firm’s founder, Harmeet Dhillon, is currently serving as President Trump’s Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the DOJ. While she is officially on leave from the firm, her influence is everywhere—especially as she advocates for stricter "Anti-Semitism" speech laws that many fear will be used to silence journalists like Candace. 2. The Daily Wire Connection: As Candace revealed tonight, this is the EXACT same law firm that represented The Daily Wire during their brutal, two-year arbitration battle against her. They know her, they’ve fought her before, and they are back for more. 3. The "In-Law" Bombshell: This is where it gets personal. Dhillon Law Group didn't just stop at representing the Daily Wire—they also hired Jacob Roth (@RothThePatriot). Who is he? An Orthodox Jewish attorney at Dhillon Law specializing in "civil rights." The Shapiro Tie: He is Ben Shapiro’s brother-in-law, married to Ben’s sister, Abby Shapiro (@ClassicallyAbby). It looks like a classic ATTACK BY PROXY. @benshapiro is her crazy ex-employer who feels more like a Jilted lover and has been relentlessly harassing and stalking her for years—seems to be weaponizing a law firm tied to the highest levels of the DOJ and his own family members to launch a legal offensive against her. This is nothing more than a desperate attempt to chill free speech and shut down her investigation into the Charlie Kirk case and the "Epstein class." They want to use the legal system to do what they couldn’t do in a debate. But they forgot one thing: Discovery works both ways. Do you think this is just a regular lawsuit or is it a coordinated effort by Shapiro and the DOJ to silence @RealCandaceO on behald of our greatest ally? The receipts are starting to pile up. 🍿

‼️FULL 11-Minute TPUSA People's Convention In Detroit Is Going VIRAL But NOT For Reason You Think—What's At The 7-minute Mark Changes EVERYTHING 👀 Everyone is talking about Nick Fuentes and Jake Shields being removed, but there is so much more happening in this frame than the "mainstream" alt-media is reporting. Watch the full, uncut video here. I’ve been scrubbing this frame-by-frame and what I found in the background changes everything. Full breakdown of the anomalies coming in the next post. STAY TUNED. 👇 FROM: @matt82704417 FOLLOW HIM!

‼️SHOCKING: Tucker Breaks Silence on the FALLOUT with Turning Point Leadership —"They DIDN'T Invite Me Back"👀 Tucker Carlson is officially DONE playing nice. In a bombshell new interview with the New York Times, Tucker just confirmed what we’ve all been noticing: The FBI botched the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s murder, and the "investigative journalist" community is being told to SHUT UP. @TuckerCarlson admitted he hasn’t been invited to headline a single Turning Point event this year. Why? He warns that the organization is being "hijacked by donors" to push a neocon agenda that young people—the ones actually of draft age—are REJECTING. 🚫🛑 Tucker backed up what National Counter Terrorism Center head @joekent16jan19 revealed—the FBI SHORT-CIRCUITED the investigation and blocked other agencies from looking into the foreign nexus. 🕵️‍♂️🏛️ Tucker is calling out the gaslighting. He’s tired of being called a "conspiracy theorist" or "evil" simply for asking why the investigation was halted. "I'm just too old for that. Why don't you answer the question?" 🗣️👊 While the media and TPUSA leadership scream "nothing to see here," Tucker is standing with the people who have eyes. He refuses to be intimidated into ignoring the blatant inconsistencies in the case. Charlie Kirk was an American patriot who fought for transparency. Now, the very organization he built is trying to silence those of us asking for the truth about his death. Tucker is right: Having eyes and noticing things isn't a crime. It's our job. WHO IS PROTECTING THE TRUTH? Share this before it gets scrubbed. We aren't going to stop asking questions until we get the full story on the foreign actors involved and why the FBI pulled the plug. 🇺🇸🚩

🚨 BREAKING: We FOUND the Romanian Orphan Girl Erika Kirk (Frantzve) Posted in 2013… Then Suspiciously DELETED 👀 Back in May 2013, influencer Erika Frantzve (now Kirk) posted this heartbreaking photo on Instagram: A little Romanian girl, maybe 6-8 years old, standing in what looks like an orphanage room. Green shirt, pink pants, a stuffed pink parrot on her shoulder, cardboard box in front of her. Caption: “I have something special for you… very special…” The post blew up… and then it vanished. Deleted without explanation. No archive, no follow-up, nothing. For the last 7 months, people have been wondering: Who was that girl? What really happened to her? Well… we found her. After digging through old screenshots, reverse image search, and public social media, we matched her to this girl — now a young woman who just graduated high school in 2024. Here’s why this is a STRONG, almost undeniable match (not just “kinda looks similar” — this is forensic-level facial consistency): Facial Feature Breakdown (permanent bone structure doesn’t lie): Eyes: Large, dark brown, wide-set, rounded shape with the exact same upper lid hooding and prominent eyelids. Identical in the 2013 photo, her childhood pics (purple tank top, pink skirt, headband), and even her recent selfies. Nose: Small, straight bridge with that soft, rounded tip. Matches perfectly across every photo from 2013 to 2024. Mouth & Smile: Small-to-medium lips, slight overbite, same upper teeth show when smiling. You can see the exact same smile in the orphanage pic, the swing set photos, the kitchen tutu shot, and her high-school grad selfies. Face Shape & Hairline: Soft rounded child face in 2013 that lengthened exactly as expected into the oval/heart-shaped teen face by 2024. Blunt straight-across bangs + straight dark brown hair in almost ALL her childhood photos — the signature look from the original post. Overall Proportions: Same slim build, leg-to-torso ratio, cheek-to-jaw transition through puberty. Timeline & Romanian Proof: The original photo is from Erika’s “Romanian Angels” charity project around 2012-2013 in Romania (specifically tied to orphanages in the Constanța area). This girl was living in Romania at that exact time. Multiple childhood photos show her in traditional Romanian folk costumes (one even tagged with the 🇷🇴 flag emoji and “Outfit Inspo”). Overlay text in her old videos: “There’s still a young girl from Romania.” Age lines up perfectly: ~6-8 in 2013 → high school graduation in 2024 (born ~2005-2007). This isn’t some random lookalike. These are the same eyes, same nose, same smile, same bangs, same Romanian orphan story. So here’s the part that should have everyone asking questions: Why did Erika Kirk delete that specific post? Why has she never followed up on “her” special little Romanian Angel? Why the sudden silence around the entire Romanian Angels project? Online chatter has been swirling for years, allegations of trafficking with the charity, claims of missing children from the Constanța orphanage, whispers that she was eventually banned from Romania, questions about where all these “angels” actually ended up. Was this little girl part of some bigger story? Was the post deleted because someone realized the trail could lead back to her? Or was there something about this specific child that made Erika scrub her from the internet? We’re not accusing anyone of anythin. But when a public figure posts a vulnerable orphan child with a dramatic caption, gets massive attention, then quietly erases the evidence while the internet is still talking about “Romanian Angels” conspiracies… it raises red flags. This girl is safe, grown, and thriving now (looks like she’s now in the US). But the questions remain: What was Erika Kirk really doing in Romania? Why delete the proof? What is she trying to hide? Drop this in the comments, tag everyone you know, and share this far and wide. The internet has a long memory — and we just connected the dots. If you have more info, screenshots, or leads — comment below, DM me or email and let’s get answers. CC: @RealCandaceO