BlueWise

Zcode 这不是和 Codex 一毛一样的吗？ 啊。。。。 拿 Codex 反编译来的？？使用都不需要思考。。 我试试 5.2编程行不行。。。

不想厮杀，不想争夺，不想诅咒，首先应该远离 CS 圈子，远离泛 CS 院系。 我和很多不同专业的学生都交流过。和文科院系、基础学科院系的学生相比，CS 系绝对是毒性最重、学生精神状态最差的院系之一，或许只比传统工科好一些。(1/2)

FT：腾讯即将推出面向14亿中国用户的微信AI助手，可以帮助用户在应用程序内完成任务，腾讯计划最早于本月启动公开发布前所需的合规流程。 #行情 腾讯港股短线拉升，涨超4%。

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

Help us shape the next GLM release: what should we prioritize most?

React 和 Vue，哪个对 AI 更友好？ 如果单纯从 AI 编码能力 的角度看，2026 年仍然是： React > Vue 但差距已经没有 2023~2024 年那么大了。为什么 React 对 AI 更友好？核心原因不是技术，而是训练数据。 AI 见过的代码大概是：