Diego L. L.

@Cocolycoco1 @karinarasic A mi me puede interesar, si querés escribime. Saludos

@karinarasic Una SA con más de 20 años operando rubro importación, dejó de facturar en 2025

Busco una empresa en marcha en Argentina para comprar, que no tenga herederos interesados en continuarla. Rubro alimentos seria mi preferido pero si hay ofertas las escucho. Quiero algo en real economy.

We added a Development page showing what we're building: execution clients (Nethermind plugin, Besu plugin, a new rebase-friendly go-ethereum fork), research experiments, and infrastructure. Each project has status, repo links, and references to upstream PRs. etccooperative.org/development

@ezequielduartte Buscá la marca Zojirushi, las venden en la Nueva Casa Japonesa

Buenaaaas, se que twitter siempre es ayuda. Estoy a punto de hacer la compra de una arrocera, ¿alguna que me recomienden que sepan que es buenisima? Primordialmente que tenga buena capacidad para hacer minimo 2kg Tambien vi que hay otros robots tipo ollas a presion electricas que tienen funcion de arrocera pero no se nada de esto, pero la idea es que sea BUENA

Today is a monumentous day for quantum computing and cryptography. Two breakthrough papers just landed (links in next tweet). Both papers improve Shor's algorithm, infamous for cracking RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. The two results compound, optimising separate layers of the quantum stack. The results are shocking. I expect a narrative shift and a further R&D boost toward post-quantum cryptography. The first paper is by Google Quantum AI. They tackle the (logical) Shor algorithm, tailoring it to crack Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The algorithm runs on ~1K logical qubits for the 256-bit elliptic curve secp256k1. Due to the low circuit depth, a fast superconducting computer would recover private keys in minutes. I'm grateful to have joined as a late paper co-author, in large part for the chance to interact with experts and the alpha gleaned from internal discussions. The second paper is by a stealthy startup called Oratomic, with ex-Google and prominent Caltech faculty. Their starting point is Google's improvements to the logical quantum circuit. They then apply improvements at the physical layer, with tricks specific to neutral atom quantum computers. The result estimates that 26,000 atomic qubits are sufficient to break 256-bit elliptic curve signatures. This would be roughly a 40x improvement in physical qubit count over previous state-of-the-art. On the flip side, a single Shor run would take ~10 days due to the relatively slow speed of neutral atoms. Below are my key takeaways. As a disclaimer, I am not a quantum expert. Time is needed for the results to be properly vetted. Based on my interactions with the team, I have faith the Google Quantum AI results are conservative. The Oratomic paper is much harder for me to assess, especially because of the use of more exotic qLDPC codes. I will take it with a grain of salt until the dust settles. → q-day: My confidence in q-day by 2032 has shot up significantly. IMO there's at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer recovers a secp256k1 ECDSA private key from an exposed public key. While a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC) before 2030 still feels unlikely, now is undoubtedly the time to start preparing. → censorship: The Google paper uses a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof to demonstrate the algorithm's existence without leaking actual optimisations. From now on, assume state-of-the-art algorithms will be censored. There may be self-censorship for moral or commercial reasons, or because of government pressure. A blackout in academic publications would be a tell-tale sign. → cracking time: A superconducting quantum computer, the type Google is building, could crack keys in minutes. This is because the optimised quantum circuit is just 100M Toffoli gates, which is surprisingly shallow. (Toffoli gates are hard because they require production of so-called "magic states".) Toffoli gates would consume ~10 microseconds on a superconducting platform, totalling ~1,000 sec of Shor runtime. → latency optimisations: Two latency optimisations bring key cracking time to single-digit minutes. The first parallelises computation across quantum devices. The second involves feeding the pubkey to the quantum computer mid-flight, after a generic setup phase. → fast- and slow-clock: At first approximation there are two families of quantum computers. The fast-clock flavour, which includes superconducting and photonic architectures, runs at roughly 100 kHz. The slow-clock flavour, which includes trapped ion and neutral atom architectures, runs roughly 1,000x slower (~100 Hz, or ~1 week to crack a single key). → qubit count: The size-optimised variant of the algorithm runs on 1,200 logical qubits. On a superconducting computer with surface code error correction that's roughly 500K physical qubits, a 400:1 physical-to-logical ratio. The surface code is conservative, assuming only four-way nearest-neighbour grid connectivity. It was demonstrated last year by Google on a real quantum computer. → future gains: Low-hanging fruit is still being picked, with at least one of the Google optimisations resulting from a surprisingly simple observation. Interestingly, AI was not (yet!) tasked to find optimisations. This was also the first time authors such as Craig Gidney attacked elliptic curves (as opposed to RSA). Shor logical qubit count could plausibly go under 1K soonish. → error correction: The physical-to-logical ratio for superconducting computers could go under 100:1. For superconducting computers that would be mean ~100K physical qubits for a CRQC, two orders of magnitude away from state of the art. Neutral atoms quantum computers are amenable to error correcting codes other than the surface code. While much slower to run, they can bring down the physical to logical qubit ratio closer to 10:1. → Bitcoin PoW: Commercially-viable Bitcoin PoW via Grover's algorithm is not happening any time soon. We're talking decades, possibly centuries away. This observation should help focus the discussion on ECDSA and Schnorr. (Side note: as unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budget.) → team quality: The folks at Google Quantum AI are the real deal. Craig Gidney (@CraigGidney) is arguably the world's top quantum circuit optimisooor. Just last year he squeezed 10x out of Shor for RSA, bringing the physical qubit count down from 10M to 1M. Special thanks to the Google team for patiently answering all my newb questions with detailed, fact-based answers. I was expecting some hype, but found none.

Todo lo que quieren las wachas

For absolutely no reason at all I would like to publicly apologize to all my Claude coding agents for all the mean things I may have said in the past six months. I love you Claude.

USDT announced that it will undergo a full audit by the Big Four firms, potentially solving the mystery of its "100% reserves" ! Stablecoin regulation is accelerating, making compliance and transparency the new industry standard. This presents a double-edged sword for ETC: ✅ Opportunity: Trusted USDT may bring increased liquidity, boosting ETC’s DeFi and trading pairs. ⚠️ Challenge: Under tighter regulations, funds may shift toward mainstream compliant chains, requiring ETC to accelerate its ecosystem development. Challenges and opportunities coexist! What do you think? 🤔 #USDT #Tether #EthereumClassic #ETC #CryptoRegulation

I oppose the Olympia Treasury proposal for Ethereum Classic. Sign the petition at nolympia.dev. #Nolympia #ETC

@mesch Hola! Entiendo que coleccionás monedas y tengo estas de Hong Kong dando vueltas x casa x si te interesan. Si las querés te las puedo mandar, realmente no sabía qué hacer con ellas. p.d.: no se por qué la palabra Hong Kong aparece espejada, pero no es algo de la foto en sí

Mi verdulera se fue a visitar a su familia a Perú y me trajo estas monedas de 1 sol conmemorativas. Son más de 30 de diferentes colecciones. En el próximo viaje me traerá más! Te quiero mucho Faustina!

Starting today, multichain explorers are the standard ✍️ Meet the new Multichain Explorer: explorer.blockscout.com It’s everything you expect from Blockscout, across the chains you use every day, all in one interface

Warning: Do not adopt any new code editors this month. Beware the IDEs of March.

@GiDavidswright Tenés una cepilladora de 1.5m! 😱😳🤤 Un sueño

@diega En el taller

Quién te hace una mesa de lapacho macizo 3” de espesor , de 3,5 de largo x 1.50 de ancho? BESO

@GiDavidswright @_pablo_valinoti Hola! Tendrás algún lugar para buscar sobre el encastre que usaste? Porque lo poquito que he encontrado bajo el nombre de “diente de perro”, refieren a que es el que se usa en algunas placas alistonadas. Muchas gracias. Linda mesa. Diego.

@_pablo_valinoti Eso tambien es fuente de perro. En la foto que subí no se aprecia bien porque es tan perfecto el encastre que no se nota, pero créeme lo que te digo. Trabajos con maderas desde hace 28 años. Del resto no sé nada.

Diente de perro es algo así

Sam Altman is such an incredible backstabber, liar and traitor. While your competitor is taking a heroic and principled stand, you swoop in to make your deal. Imagine working for this guy - is there a greater shame? This should lead to a mass exodus from OpenAI.

Two weeks ago I made a bet with @VitalikButerin that one person could agentic-code an @ethereum client targeting 2030+ roadmap. So I built ETH2030 (eth2030.com | github.com/jiayaoqijia/et…). 702K lines of Go. 65 roadmap items. Syncs with mainnet. Here's what I found.

シンジの震える背中も、レイの透き通るような孤独も、記憶のまんまだ。 1995年、学校から帰ってテレビにかじりついたあの夕方。 まさか30年後、あのOPを全カット写実CGで完全復刻する人が現れるなんて。 再生ボタン押した瞬間、涙腺が崩壊した…… 全26話を見直し、1フレームずつ手作業で再現。 こんな狂気じみた愛を捧げさせるのは、本物の名作だけだ。 俺たちの青春が、ここで「補完」された。 一緒に泣いたヤツ→いいね👇 via：有時映画 #エヴァンゲリオン #新世紀エヴァンゲリオン #残酷な天使のテーゼ #seedance2 #AI動畫 #EVA

I spent the night watching Claude Code work through difficult problems with its relentless will, and it reminded me of my father the first time we brought an automatic washing machine home. He spent the night staring at the drum going back and forth for hours, completely hypnotized. I'm the same, just watching a different machine.

5.3-Codex did for research engineering what 4.5 Opus did for front-end engineering. Don't try it on the problem you're working on—try it on the problem you thought was too big to solve

Now proudly introducing, the first ever vibecoded Ethereum execution client It's actually 2 clients - Zig client - @EffectTS_ client If you want to see how the AI Slop Sausage is made, follow XVI 1/2