inHuman (✴️,♦️)

BREAKING: The Bitcoin conference saw a record low turnout this year, with only a few dozen attendees. Several speakers also didn’t show, and the event ended 4 hours early.

Beretta HQ vs Glock

Testosterone supplementation erased the audience effect in male generosity. Men on placebo became more prosocial when watched; testosterone-treated men did not. In other words: they didn’t let an audience dictate their behaviour.

Let’s be real..

Highly educated women keep telling me, at the end of conversations about society, “Why do you care about what’s true?” It must have happened a dozen times by now. This has been the single most blackpilling thing I’ve ever had to grapple with

The Default State Perpetually believing matters aren't right/wrong but a matter of “perspective” is a great way to never figure anything out and derive actionable conclusions. This is the foundation of feminine chaos. It manifests as “equality”, “inclusion”, “harmony”, “dignity”, "lived experience", and treating every output equally. “Equality” (equilibrium) is the feminine north star. “Hierarchy” (gradient) is the masculine’s. These are structurally at odds with each other. Introducing objectivity embeds hierarchy by definition; this is the foundation of masculine order. Sorting. Falsifying. Systematizing. It manifests as “standards”, “obligations”, “accountability”, “honor”, “exclusion”. Standards are exclusionary by nature. In the absence of standards, all is equitable. She will instinctively resist hierarchy and boundaries, wielding sympathy (appeal to feelings) to insist that structure is harmful (exclusionary). The strongest indicator of feminine cognition is its refusal to systemize (e.g. treating everything as unique, denying patterns, resisting scalable rules). This mindset will instinctively hunt for outliers and treat them as common (“But not all”). It thinks a couple anecdotes undoes an aggregate. Every argument will reduce to a “but not all”-ism. All fluid, no form. She takes exceptions and paints them as rule: that there can be no hard rules. Chaos by another name. THERMODYNAMICALLY: an energy gradient is "unequal." To reduce it is to axiomatically increase entropy, which is to drift toward equilibrium. Maximum entropy is, quite literally, maximum equality. “Equality” is simply the human-legible term for thermodynamic equilibrium: the state of maximum disorder. The absence of any gradient produces equality by default. Thermodynamically, death and equilibrium are the same thing. A man who hears something false and says "wow, what an interesting perspective!" deserves the chaos coming his way. He denies his programming when he abdicates his duty to maintain hierarchy, gradient, and order. He must act to fulfill his role. Extrinsic. While she fulfills her role regardless. A necessary antagonism to order’s structural force. She doesn’t need to act to fulfill hers, rather it’s the absence of actions that accomplishes it. Don't do things, just feel things. Intrinsic. Order is achieved exclusively via action. Whereas chaos exists by default when you do nothing. Maximum entropy is the default state; it's the pinnacle of equality. It sometimes exists through action, and always through inaction. Dignity is something you deserve just for existing (no action needed). Honor must be earned through deeds (action required). One demands performance, the other rewards existence. One insists you “move to prove”, the other says you can “sit to get”. Guess which genders they cluster along? Human becoming (honor) vs human being (dignity) The feminine plays a critical role here. This dyadic interplay is necessary. Unalloyed forms of either pole are death. Pure order is death by crystallization; pure chaos is death by dissolution. All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Men build the gradient, women redistribute it. It is our natures. Cycles. Physics flows through all things. The social is just veneer.