

Pedro Martins
1.2K posts

@nikuscs
🇵🇹 Doing stuff. Typescript, React, AI . Building : https://t.co/DILygdVkQj, https://t.co/HzLd4WBtMX, https://t.co/DZo2ZCRQUn, https://t.co/czk5c7iPs0





Yes! Flying mounts ruin games. Ground travel is so much more interesting than air travel. You have to navigate, you sometimes have to face danger. Air just skips everything and you fly in a straight line. When my friends and I were playing Ark I had to make a no-flying-mounts rule because the challenge of navigating the terrain and avoiding tough dinos is a huge part of the game and if you can just fly then you lose all that. I also loved that in the original Ark, the only map you got didn't show your position or direction. You had to navigate by landmarks and memory. Wish more people would make games with expansive worlds with no map and no fast travel. The game has to be designed for it, though -- like quests have to be designed so you aren't constantly going back and forth across the world, and landmarks have to be distinct enough for you to be able to navigate off of them.



Apps are dead. We just shipped this. Screenshot anything in the App Store → drop it into chat → swipe up for an instant @openclaw agent → delete app, save $29/year Add agents to every group or chat. No signup. No download. New agent, every group. Invite only for now.


All aggregators had their payouts reduced to 60% this cycle. We will add another 20% deduction in the next cycle. It became abundantly clear: flooding the timeline with 100 stolen reposts and clickbait everyday crowded-out real creators and hurt new author growth. The next step is to assign a permanent deduction to habitual bait posters who use “🚨BREAKING”on every post. X will never infringe on speech or reach—but we will not compensate for manipulation of the program or our users.






Im getting pretty exhausted about all this AI companies doing shady stuff, they keep cutting corners left and right in order to reduce costs. I totally get that @AnthropicAI got a massive boom, and need to reduce the usages and so on, thats totally acceptable, but can we please get a "stable" model/usage-limits for more than 3 months please? Im at the point where im gonna throw all this shit back and go back to the basics until we get a decent AI company that keeps their words. Timeline: - Opus 4.6 Released - Damn good! - Massive Marketing - OMGLUL we getting to much users, who have though? 😂 - We need to reduce usage - Everyone mad, cut OpenClaw, all good people got along. - Massive nerf to thinking or whatever they did, vibes don't lie. We back to sloopy model acting like GPT-3. - OH wait, the solution is to use Opus for "brain" and "Haiku" reducing as much as 20 cents, great, here we go again, workarounds for cutting costs. I'm giving @OpenAI codex a fair try starting next month and hopefully OpenAI doesnt fall into the same mistakes as Anthropic did, otherwise we might as well start looking into Chinese Model & Opensource more and more, because in the long term, companies cant rely on flaky models every 15 days.





