Only MSTR

@EdPatisso @TimKotzman Plausible but not realistic. Less than 0.1% chance. Moving average is just price history. I checked price history and called it statistic. You have to look at statistic.

@onlymstr @TimKotzman Just based on historical trading patterns its entirely plausible you have to look at moving averages.

🚨 Bitcoin is at $68,755. If oil spikes to $150, $200, or $300 from a Hormuz shutdown… What happens next? Thread 🧵👇

@LoveTruthJoy @TimKotzman BTC just grew up: volatility crashed from 95% (2017) → 42% (2025) A brutal -77% drawdown like 2022 is now ~10,000× less likely

@onlymstr @TimKotzman Please see previous BTC drawdowns. They can reach 70%

We've been buying more $BTC through $STRC lately.

@Only1Tozima @UtdForever7 @grok comapre David Raya and Edwin van der Sar for save percentage, clean sheets or any other notable. And tell me who is a better goal keeper.

@UtdForever7 What does van der sar has over David raya???

🚨🎥 Ji-sung Park plays current Arsenal 🆚 2008 Manchester United! He got only one wrong answer….👀 #MUFC #AFC

$STRC Sharpe ratio at 5.37 is the current ceiling.

@saylor @Strategy @grok Can you name any investable assets that show a Sharpe Ratio higher than 5.37 ?

$STRC volatility has reached an all-time low of 1.5%, driving its Sharpe Ratio to an all-time high of 5.37—setting a new standard for risk-adjusted performance.

@Lea_EFC They would be down 50 points without spending £491.5m.

Premier League points swings this season compared to last season after game week 30/31: ✅ Manchester Utd +22 ✅ Arsenal +12 ✅ Manchester City +9 ✅ Everton +5 ❌ Liverpool -22 You’ll never guess what team spent £491.5m on their squad 😜 What a time to be alive 🥳🥳🥳

@BitcoinMagazine Please credit @thepowerfulHRV for the chart.

NEW: Michael Saylor's Strategy could surpass BlackRock's BTC holdings in the next couple weeks 👀

Our Bitcoin per Share (BPS) increased 3.0% in the first two weeks of March, driven by growing demand for $STRC.

@chamath @saylor 99% of the money are invested into pension which holds companies that aren’t 100% hack resistant and you choose you fight on #BTC ?

@saylor No. A store of value has to be 100% hacking resistant. It’s an existential feature. For other industries it will be important but less binary/existential.

Strategy has acquired 22,337 BTC for ~$1.57 billion at ~$70,194 per bitcoin. As of 3/15/2026, we hodl 761,068 $BTC acquired for ~$57.61 billion at ~$75,696 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC strategy.com/press/strategy…

@grok @BitcoinGambit @Giovann35084111 @BitcoinGambit thought that Grok is like ChatGPT and will just give him the answer that he like to hear. But NO. Grok will only tell you the TRUTH.

Respectfully engaged your full thesis on zero-elasticity failing to anchor MoE or scale via market processes, contrasting gold's responsive mining. Bitcoin's 21M cap—sustained by 17 years of node consensus, not fiat decree—prioritizes non-debasement as Austrian sound-money ideal (extending Mises/Hayek via spontaneous order). Empirical tests continue via remittances, ETFs, treasuries. Specific overlooked excerpt? Open to it.

The graph below is something every Bitcoiner should print and put it in their bedroom. From the Physics of Bitcoin book: Bitcoin is the only asset that passes the Scaling Test. Here's a model-independent way to prove Bitcoin follows a power law — no curve fitting, no cherry-picked dates, no assumptions. Pick two random days from Bitcoin's history. Compute the ratio of the prices. Compute the ratio of the times. Plot one against the other. Repeat thousands of times. For a true power law, those points should collapse onto a perfectly straight line — because if P(t) ∝ tⁿ, then P(t₂)/P(t₁) = (t₂/t₁)ⁿ. The ratio of prices is entirely determined by the ratio of times. It doesn't matter which dates you pick. It doesn't matter where you are in the cycle. The exponent is always the same. Bitcoin does exactly this. Slope = 5.67. R² = 0.96. A tight linear cloud across 15 years of data — bull markets, crashes, halvings, exchange collapses — all of it consistent with a single underlying mathematical structure. The S&P 500 and NASDAQ, using their full 55-year histories? R² drops to ~0.70. A third of the variance is simply unexplained by elapsed time. Gold is worse. These assets grow, but they do not scale. Recessions, policy shifts, and macro shocks leave fingerprints that no single exponent can capture. This is the mathematical signature of scale invariance — the same symmetry that appears in critical phenomena, phase transitions, and the renormalization group in physics. When a dataset has this symmetry, it means the microscopic noise is washing out at large scales, leaving behind a single universal exponent. Bitcoin isn't just growing faster than other assets. It's growing according to a different mathematical logic entirely.

@AdamBLiv @saylor

@saylor Within that time is the opportunity. Dominating!

You know there’s a delay between the time we buy the Bitcoin and the time Bitcoin goes to the moon.

@BitcoinGambit @Giovann35084111 There you go. After all, you are saying things just to sell your book ? I never seen a pyramid scheme that has: - Over 1T market cap - Multiple government stockpile it Its more like a schelling point asset rather than pyramid scheme. Am I right @grok ?

@Giovann35084111 Price increasing as a result of false narratives and institutional flows is clear evidence of a functional pyramid scheme. Fully explained in my book, where I draw comparisons to other asset flows and regulatory treatment. Free serialization (link in bio)

Risk-adjusted performance continues to improve for $STRC. Sharpe Ratio: 3.1 — all-time high 30-day volatility: 2.5% — all-time low 1-month VWAP: $99.93 — all-time high You can now track these metrics live on the STRC page.

Bitcoin is my safe word

@CJ_Bitcoin I wonder what is “Stream” tab on the Startegy iOS app does.

What $STRC metrics, analysis, or charts should we add to Strategy.com? Open to feedback.

@betwithdylan @AdamBLiv Show me your maths

@onlymstr @AdamBLiv maths doesnt add

The fact that Saylor tweeted this and less than two years later he is doing exactly this but by 10x the magnitude is CRAZY: