Raymond Reddington
1.7K posts

Raymond Reddington
@reddingtonwise
global macro analysis & occasional reflections on reality
Bagdad, FL انضم Mart 2023
383 يتبع129 المتابعون
تغريدة مثبتة

@supertolerant @renrubuk The dysgenic underclass is who they really are.
English

The “working class” speaks.
- Has emotionally unstable personality disorder.
- Permanently signed off work.
- Fired from every job she’s ever had.
Remember when being working class meant actually going to work?



Inevitable Pinky 🐡🏳️🌈🇬🇧🇬🇱🇪🇺@BpdLion
I'm white, British and working class. Working class people who vote for Reform are thick as pig shit. It's just like Brexit, they hated the EU but couldn't articulate a single reason why.
English

Please explain how, my first of seeing this and it looks pretty damning tbh. From what I can see, that's a forward intelligence officer signalling a hand off to another officer, usually after a target has been identified. Why is Lewis Brackpool running cover this man, and subsequently asking people to delete the post?
English

@BritBoy95X @Lewis_Brackpool This was put to bed ages ago.
English

What is going on here @Lewis_Brackpool ?



Tyrant Finder U.K@TyrantFinder
We all remember when this guy showed up with Danny Tommo and The Traditional Bricklayer. If I remember correctly, Bricklayer asked right away, 'Why are we on the pavement?' and then led the crowd onto the road. Ash signaled the police, and Danny Tommo moved to the right, jumped over a wall, and made his escape. Then, the arrests started. Haven’t heard much from those three since. #Throwback #DannyTommo #TraditionalBricklayer #Protests #Memories
English
Raymond Reddington أُعيد تغريده

Get a Claude subscription, upload the two datasets to a project folder, and execute this prompt within the project, return the diff:
# TASK — COMPARE TWO MET CRIME DATASETS
## Objective
Compare two supplied Met Police Excel datasets and explain, using only the data in those two files, why the total changes from:
- Dataset A: 332,226 recorded crimes
- Dataset B: 288,702 recorded crimes
- Difference: -43,524
The task is to identify where the 43,524 difference comes from.
Do not speculate. Do not use external sources. Do not explain based on assumptions. Only report what can be proven or strongly evidenced from the two datasets.
## Inputs
Dataset A:
``
Dataset B:
``
Dataset A label:
`2 May file`
Dataset B label:
`5 May refreshed file`
Comparison period:
`January 2026 to April 2026`
Expected headline totals:
```text
Dataset A: 332,226
Dataset B: 288,702
Expected difference: -43,524
Scope:
Use only the two supplied Excel files.
Do not modify either file.
Do not use external sources.
Do not infer causes that are not visible in the data.
The output should be a deterministic comparison of the two files.
Required Work
1. Confirm the headline totals
Open both files and verify whether the totals can be reproduced.
Report:
2 May reproduced total:
5 May reproduced total:
Reproduced difference:
Matches expected 43,524 difference: YES / NO
If the expected totals do not reproduce exactly, explain which counting method gets closest.
2. Compare file structure
Compare:
- sheet names
- column names
- number of rows
- data types where obvious
- any columns present in one file but not the other
- any sheets present in one file but not the other
Report whether the files appear structurally comparable.
3. Compare totals by month
For January, February, March, and April 2026, calculate:
Month | 2 May total | 5 May total | Difference | Share of total difference
This should show whether the missing 43,524 is spread evenly or concentrated in specific months.
4. Compare totals by offence/category
Group by the main offence/category field or fields available in the files.
Calculate:
Category | 2 May total | 5 May total | Difference | Share of total difference
Rank by largest absolute difference.
This should identify which offence categories explain most of the fall.
5. Compare totals by borough/location
Group by the main borough/location/geography field or fields available.
Calculate:
Location | 2 May total | 5 May total | Difference | Share of total difference
Rank by largest absolute difference.
This should identify whether the fall is concentrated in certain locations.
6. Identify rows present in 2 May but missing from 5 May
If a stable record ID exists, match using that ID.
If no stable ID exists, use a conservative composite key from the fields available, such as:
month/date + borough/location + offence category + offence subtype + count/value
Report:
Number of records in 2 May but not in 5 May:
Top categories among missing records:
Top months among missing records:
Top locations among missing records:
7. Identify rows present in 5 May but missing from 2 May
Using the same matching method, report:
Number of records in 5 May but not in 2 May:
Top categories among added records:
Top months among added records:
Top locations among added records:
8. Identify changed records
Where the same record/key appears in both files, identify whether any values changed.
Report:
Number of matched records with changed values:
Fields most often changed:
Categories most affected:
Months most affected:
Locations most affected:
9. Check duplicate differences
Check whether the 2 May file contains duplicates that are absent from the 5 May file.
Report:
Exact duplicate rows in 2 May:
Exact duplicate rows in 5 May:
Duplicate difference:
Can duplicate removal explain the 43,524 difference? YES / NO / PARTIAL
Also check duplicates using the same matching key used for row comparison.
10. Check category recoding
Identify whether one category shrank while another category grew in a way that suggests records may have been recoded rather than removed.
Report:
- Possible source category
- Possible destination category
- Source category change
- Destination category change
- Net effect
- Evidence strength: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / UNCLEAR
Do not claim recoding happened unless the pattern is visible in the data.
11. Build the gap explanation
Create a deterministic gap bridge:
2 May reproduced total
minus records present in 2 May but missing from 5 May
plus records present in 5 May but missing from 2 May
plus/minus changed values in matched records
plus/minus identifiable category/date/location/scope effects
equals 5 May reproduced total
Unexplained residual:
The bridge must show how much of the 43,524 difference is explained by each visible mechanism.
12. Final conclusion
Write a concise conclusion answering:
Based only on the two datasets, what caused the fall from 332,226 to 288,702?
Use only these labels:
- REMOVED_FROM_REFRESH
- ADDED_IN_REFRESH
- VALUE_CHANGED
- CATEGORY_RECODE_VISIBLE
- DATE_SCOPE_CHANGE_VISIBLE
- LOCATION_SCOPE_CHANGE_VISIBLE
- DUPLICATE_REMOVAL_VISIBLE
- STRUCTURE_CHANGE_VISIBLE
-UNEXPLAINED_FROM_DATA_ONLY
If the two files show that rows disappeared but do not show why, say:
The files show that these records are present in the 2 May file and absent from the 5 May file, but the files alone do not explain why they were removed.
Output Format
Return:
- headline total check
- file structure comparison
- month-level difference table
- location-level difference tableence table
-location-level difference table
- records present in 2 May but absent from 5 May
- records present in 5 May but absent from 2 May
- changed matched records
- duplicate analysis
- possible recoding analysis
- gap bridge
- unexplained residual
- final conclusion
Success Criterion:
The output succeeds if it deterministically explains where the 43,524 difference is located across months, categories, locations, missing records, added records, changed records, duplicates, and visible recoding/scope changes, while clearly separating proven data differences from anything that cannot be explained by the two files alone.
English

🚨 EXPOSED: Did the Met Police just wipe 43,000 crimes from London’s figures?
I’ve been digging through the latest crime data and found something extraordinary.
📅 On 2nd May, the Met’s published Excel data showed 332,226 crimes recorded in London during the first 4 months of 2026.
📅 Then on 5th May, after a “data refresh”, the official total suddenly dropped to 288,702.
That means 43,524 crimes apparently vanished from the figures in the space of three days.
I still have the original 2nd May Excel file.
And the changes make no sense.
There’s no obvious duplication or double counting that would explain a swing this large.
Some categories changed dramatically.
For example, the updated figures suddenly show around 500 fewer rapes than the original data published just days earlier.
I’ll be publishing the full original dataset on my Substack in the coming days.
English

@AshtonForbes Wasn't this debunked entirely? I swear they literally found the visual FX footage, like for like, that was used in the original footage.
English

Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rallies are being exposed by their own original organisers.
@FranklySpeakP is right to say they are pressure release valves for the establishment that achieve nothing.
More interesting though is @calvinrobinson revealing that Robinson brought with him to the original organisers committee a bunch of his Jewish fatcat financiers who pushed for “Judeo-Christian values” to feature which is also why Israeli flags were all over the first UTK event.
Slowly but surely people are waking up to the fact that Tommy Robinson is designed to make British nationalists fail and to push the propaganda of the Jewish/Israel lobby.
English

@Tim30do @RupertLowe10 Demography is destiny. Midwit materialists like yourself will never understand this though.
English

@RupertLowe10 Honestly, do you really believe immigrants are the only reason this country is struggling?
Or is the real problem politicians getting richer and more powerful while ordinary people keep getting poorer?
English

@elonmusk This could be harmful to Trans women who only pass in very low lighting conditions.
English

I've managed to dig this up. Alistair Harrison, born 1992, runs Alistair Harrison Communications Ltd from a Maidstone address - which is just the corporate wrapper for his real job: ghostwriting every word Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain have posted for years. The KC harassment investigation named him as an 'independent contractor' who was meant to be Lowe's social media guy but 'played a larger part.' His Ukrainian wife Kateryna Petrenko (1993, same address, previously of Louis Vuitton) was also listed on Lowe's team during the scandal. The Restore Substack says 'not affiliated' in its bio, which is legally true in the sense that a ventriloquist's dummy isn't affiliated with the hand up its back, I suppose. That's to say, the entire online output of a party that wants to run the country is seemingly two anonymous people in a house in Maidstone...
English

Please read.
Today, I was supposed to speak at the Restore Britain youth wing launch in York. I was asked two weeks ago and jumped at the opportunity because like of all us I want to get behind something real.
However, I received a message this morning to say that because of what I tweeted last night that those higher up would rather me not speak at today’s event.
The tweet in question:
A picture of the newly elected Restore councillors with the caption, “Exactly what British politics should look like. White. British. Proud.”
To say I was taken aback doesn’t even describe it. I fully understand that a new party must be strategic and bring people along gradually. That’s why I immediately asked whether the issue was solely this tweet. The answer was yes.
Given what Restore, Rupert, and other senior figures have openly said in the past, this decision has left me at a complete loss. While preparing our speeches we were also told we could not use the word “remigration”. Of course, this didn’t sit well with me, but like I say, I’m wise enough to understand that an emerging party needs to be strategic and bring people along gradually. Regardless, I do feel we are at the stage where this is a widely accepted term across Europe and the UK should follow suit.
I want to be clear, this isn’t just about me personally. It’s about the broader direction. While I support the need for careful messaging to win wider support, these two incidents together have left me feeling blindsided and concerned.
To those who have followed me since 2020, you know where I stand. I have always put England and the United Kingdom first. I left a previous organisation last year for the very same reason. I will not compromise on core principles. I remain unashamedly Britain First, and I will continue to speak and act with honesty and conviction.
I have decided to share this information because if this was Reform, for example, the public would want to know and rightfully so. I believe in transparency and holding everyone to the same standard, especially those who present themselves as an alternative to the failed status quo.
This isn’t a tweet to turn everybody against Restore. I hope and pray these are just teething errors. However, whoever these people are that are “higher up” (as it always is), they need to decide exactly what Restore stands for. You cannot champion British identity in public speeches and interviews, only to quietly punish those who carry the same message. Clarity and consistency matter, especially the times we now live in. The British public are vulnerable.
Today I would’ve spent eight hours travelling, four hours to get to York and hours back. I was still allowed to attend the event but in all honesty I just feel completely flat. I poured my heart and soul into my speech and really wanted to share it with everyone and help Restore attract more keen young voters. I tweeted this last night, so why a decision wasn’t made then is beyond me. Not to mention, my stance on the UK and immigration was public information when I was invited to speak. Poor organisation and a complete lack of communication. Not to mention I feel completely disheartened and once again questioning who is really pulling the strings.
I want to reiterate that this is not an attempt to try and ‘destroy’ Restore. All the efforts that went into Great Yarmouth recently was truly a sight to behold. It made me emotional to see so many people campaign and travel from all over to make a difference. This is the Britain I want to see.
I will leave this here. I just think the British public are owed full transparency. After everything we’ve been through it’s the least we deserve. I will continue to speak the truth and always put Britain first.
Thank you for the continued support. I appreciate you all.
🏴🇬🇧
English

@TomK_Brit1993 @ConksDunlop You are yet another weak man who would lead us into hard times to appease lesser men.
English

Nothing.
I want to apologise to any Reform supporters who may genuinely have believed, after seeing me associating with Restore Britain supporters, that I held racist views. I do not want to be known as someone who thinks Zia Yusuf should be deported because he is a brown man. That is not what I believe, nor what I stand for.
English

I want to apologise to each and every one of my Reform UK followers if you ever saw me supporting Restore Britain and criticising Reform, during that period when I let my guard down, allowed my judgement to lapse, and briefly aligned myself with a racist fringe movement.
Reform UK are the only party on the right with any realistic hope of forming a government and changing this country for the better 🇬🇧 🩵
English

@JackHadders Lol, maybe wait for a resolution to the situation before you start begging people for apologies, you absolute melt 😂
English


@Con_Tomlinson @Saskiateague The problem is that Charlie and Harrison don’t run Restore.
Alistair Harrison runs Restore and he is in the business of denouncing people and gatekeeping Rupert from anything deemed “too extreme”.
It’s time we accept what is really happening at the heart of Rupert’s office.
English

Lol, the idea that Labour started from nothing is a lovely bit of cope. The Fabian Society was founded 16 years before the party existed. The Rowntree Trusts bankrolled the policy research, Leonard Woolf wrote the foreign policy. Jewish (and some Quaker) financiers then funded the entire apparatus. The trade unions provided the boots on the ground, but the brains and the money came from liberal elites of the day (the Fabians). It was a coalition of several powerful groups, it did not miraculously spring forth out of the ether. The reality is when it comes to manifestations of power, it is rarely, if ever, organic.
English

@mitfoid @Saskiateague It is extremely hard but remember once upon a time the Labour Party had none of that either and look where it got.
English

these people (leftard antisocialists) are mentally deranged. they come from a place of envy at other peoples rewards for the work put in to achieve things, i bet when this guy owns his own house and sees how much can be made renting out a room or two he will suddenly delete this interview. twats.
English
Raymond Reddington أُعيد تغريده

@STEVE_MK_ @RupertLowe10 @WildExmoor Do you remember when people used to call you racist for voting Reform? Those men there no doubt would have stuck up for you. Now look at you, you're an embarrassment.
English
Raymond Reddington أُعيد تغريده

@oldishbird1 @PaulEmbery No, only natives with lineage should be represented - if you are not a citizen, you are a guest. Ergo, you pay tax for the privilege of living here, nothing else. Otherwise you can always leave!
English

@PaulEmbery Anyone that pays tax in the UK should have the right to be represented.
English















