Helix 🇺🇸

Report: Hundreds of Iraqi convoys have entered Iran.

It’s honestly surreal to see anyone still pointing to the 2015 JCPOA as some kind of 'success' when the ground reality has completely demolished that theory. You’re talking about a 3.67% enrichment limit written on a piece of paper, but while you were celebrating the deal, the regime was busy proving that the paper didn’t mean a thing to them. The ultimate proof of that failure wasn't just a minor slip, it was the 84% red flag. In 2023, the IAEA found particles at the underground Fordow site enriched to 83.7% purity. That is not a 'fluctuation' or an accident, it’s a heartbeat away from 90% weapons-grade, and there is zero civilian justification for it on this planet. They weren't being 'contained' by your deal, they were running circles around it, using the diplomatic cover and the $100 billion in sanctions relief to master the exact technology needed to build a bomb while your team was busy checking seals on old centrifuges. The JCPOA didn't stop the threat; it just subsidized it. It gave them the 'breathing room' to fund their 'strategic depth' through the Axis of Resistance (Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis) and perfect the high-tech triggers and hypersonic missiles needed to actually deliver a nuke. To keep citing a 2015 enrichment cap of 3.67% now, after they've already hit 84% and set the region on fire, is just willful blindness. The regime didn't follow the letter of your deal, they used it as a refueling station to reach the finish line.

It’s honestly surreal to see anyone still pointing to the 2015 JCPOA as some kind of 'success' when the ground reality has completely demolished that theory. You’re talking about a 3.67% enrichment limit written on a piece of paper, but while you were celebrating the deal, the regime was busy proving that the paper didn’t mean a thing to them. The ultimate proof of that failure wasn't just a minor slip, it was the 84% red flag. In 2023, the IAEA found particles at the underground Fordow site enriched to 83.7% purity. That is not a 'fluctuation' or an accident, it’s a heartbeat away from 90% weapons-grade, and there is zero civilian justification for it on this planet. They weren't being 'contained' by your deal, they were running circles around it, using the diplomatic cover and the $100 billion in sanctions relief to master the exact technology needed to build a bomb while your team was busy checking seals on old centrifuges. The JCPOA didn't stop the threat; it just subsidized it. It gave them the 'breathing room' to fund their 'strategic depth' through the Axis of Resistance (Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis) and perfect the high-tech triggers and hypersonic missiles needed to actually deliver a nuke. To keep citing a 2015 enrichment cap of 3.67% now, after they've already hit 84% and set the region on fire, is just willful blindness. The regime didn't follow the letter of your deal, they used it as a refueling station to reach the finish line.

Trump’s comments last night about “Obama’s Iran deal” were simply wrong. It wasn’t perfect, but it capped uranium enrichment at 3.67%. Since Trump scrapped it, Iran has enriched to 60%—much closer to weapons-grade. And that stockpile still hasn’t been eliminated.

Where is the targeted elimination of the regime’s top figures? People are watching individuals like Mohsen Ejei and other senior officials move publicly and visibly, without consequence. At the same time, they are seeing Iraqi militia forces entering blatantly in broad daylight, columns of vehicles, clearly exposed, without even an attempt at concealment, yet there is no response, no interception, no action from US or Israeli forces. This contrast is not going unnoticed. On one hand, there is apparent inaction toward high-value regime targets and incoming militia support. On the other, there are strikes hitting infrastructure inside Iran: bridges, power facilities, and other civilian-adjacent systems that directly affect the population. The result is a shift in perception. Iranians who once supported these operations, who placed trust in the intentions of the United States and Israel, are now beginning to question them. Confidence is eroding. Trust is being replaced with doubt. Do policymakers in Washington or Jerusalem understand that this shift is happening in real time? Do they recognize that public perception inside Iran is changing, and that it may soon become much harder to regain that lost trust?

Where is the targeted elimination of the regime’s top figures? People are watching individuals like Mohsen Ejei and other senior officials move publicly and visibly, without consequence. At the same time, they are seeing Iraqi militia forces entering blatantly in broad daylight, columns of vehicles, clearly exposed, without even an attempt at concealment, yet there is no response, no interception, no action from US or Israeli forces. This contrast is not going unnoticed. On one hand, there is apparent inaction toward high-value regime targets and incoming militia support. On the other, there are strikes hitting infrastructure inside Iran: bridges, power facilities, and other civilian-adjacent systems that directly affect the population. The result is a shift in perception. Iranians who once supported these operations, who placed trust in the intentions of the United States and Israel, are now beginning to question them. Confidence is eroding. Trust is being replaced with doubt. Do policymakers in Washington or Jerusalem understand that this shift is happening in real time? Do they recognize that public perception inside Iran is changing, and that it may soon become much harder to regain that lost trust?

در راستای تأکیدات رهبر معظم انقلاب اسلامی و مصادف با ایام نخستین سال و مقارن با بهار طبیعت؛ حجت‌الاسلام والمسلمین محسنی اژه‌ای، یک اصله نهال غرس کرد.

Your recent rhetoric, talking in extreme terms and threatening catastrophic destruction, probably won’t have the effect you’re aiming for. Authoritarian regimes tend to turn that kind of language into propaganda, using it to reinforce a “we’re under attack” narrative and rally people around them. Comments like “sending Iran back to the Stone Age” can actually help them justify repression and shift attention away from their own internal problems. It can also backfire politically, both internationally and inside the US, where these kinds of threats are often seen as disproportionate and harmful to civilians. That kind of backlash can make it harder to build support for any broader strategy. A more effective approach is to clearly separate the regime from the population. Focus on the IRGC’s leadership, its mid-level operators, and the financial/logistical networks that keep it running. At the same time, civilian infrastructure, especially electricity and water, should be treated as off-limits and as clear red lines. Targeting the coercive core while protecting everyday life is more likely to weaken the regime without strengthening its grip or pushing the population further into its narrative. Example: Many Iranians see Iraqi militias crossing the border and operating alongside the IRGC with little to no visible response, and they’re questioning it. That’s exactly the kind of pressure point where enforcement would have the most impact, yet it’s being left unaddressed. When clearly defined redlines aren’t acted on, it raises doubts about whether there’s real intent to support the outcome people are hoping for.

Trump rightly acknowledged the slaughter of Iranian protesters in his speech last night. But I heard nothing in his speech about what he planned to do for the pro-democratic Iranians still alive. I hope some efforts to help them are quietly underway. I fear that they are not.

Back to the Stone Age.

An 11-minute time-lapse video showing tens of thousands of Iranians gathering in Washington, DC chanting: Long Live Iran Long Live the King [Reza Pahlavi] Thank you Trump USA USA USA Islamic Regime Must Go Video taken next to the Treasury Department, 15th St.

ARM THE IRANIAN PEOPLE IMMEDIATELY! I've been calling for this for weeks on radio.  One thing we can do, which Reagan did in Afghanistan, Angola, and Nicaragua, is ARM THE PEOPLE in Iran so they are no longer butchered by these monsters without the ability to fight back!  They will rise up as a real fighting force, but they need weapons!  And it must be done IMMEDIATELY, especially if we are talking about ending our military operation in a few weeks!