TyMoTrilla

3.1K posts

TyMoTrilla banner
TyMoTrilla

TyMoTrilla

@tbone8ty

twit a twit

USA انضم Şubat 2009
215 يتبع192 المتابعون
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
@WallStreetApes The experience of having to order ahead of time so your not standing there like an idiot waiting 15 min for a cup of coffee?
English
0
0
0
3
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Starbucks CEO defends a cup of coffee costing $9 He says the customers needs to just not think about it as a $9 cup of coffee, you’re paying for the “experience” of getting a Starbucks coffee “In some cases a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging, and then what that means is we have to make it worthwhile.” He says Starbucks customers “want to have a special experience and regardless of what your income level is, in some cases, a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging — well, this is a really affordable premium experience” How out of touch could a person possibly be…
English
11.8K
3.1K
13.4K
2.9M
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
@Thesecretinves2 What would that conference like islf we never got the dip last October and we were sitting around 175k-200k. I think the message would have been more about the original ethos of btc and self custody
English
0
0
1
23
🇬🇧 The Bitcoin & Crypto Accountant 🇬🇧🚀
I was at the Bitcoin conference the last 2 days… and if I’m honest, it didn’t feel like a Bitcoin event at times. It felt like a crypto / TradFi crossover. That might sound subtle, but it’s a big difference to me There was a lot of talk about: • Public companies • Capital raising • Lending products • Institutional flows All interesting. All relevant. But… is that really Bitcoin? Because Bitcoin, at its core, isn’t about financial engineering. It’s about opting out. Bitcoin was born out of distrust in the existing system. A response to bailouts, debasement, and central control. Not to be repackaged back into the same system it was designed to replace. The message used to be simple: • Buy Bitcoin • Take custody • Hold long term No counterparty risk. No middlemen. No games. Not your keys.... Now it feels like we’re drifting toward: • “Exposure” instead of ownership • Custodians instead of self custody • Yield products instead of sovereignty And that shift matters. Because once you introduce leverage, lending, and layers of abstraction… You reintroduce the very risks Bitcoin was meant to remove. Maybe this is just the natural cycle. As Bitcoin grows, institutions arrive. And with them comes complexity, products, and profit motives. But somewhere along the way, it feels like the signal is getting lost in the noise. Bitcoin isn’t just another asset class. It’s a completely different system. I’m not anti innovation. And I’m not anti business. Of course im not. But I do think it’s worth asking: Are we building on Bitcoin… or rebuilding the old system around it? Because if we’re not careful, we end up with: A decentralised asset… wrapped in centralised risk. Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this is just part of adoption. But it definitely felt like something had shifted. Curious to hear from others who were there… Did it feel like a Bitcoin conference to you?
English
42
5
79
9.7K
Barbell Financial 💪🏻💰
The latest salary data was released Here is the median salary by age: 20-24: $41k 25-34: $60k 35-44: $72k 45-54: $72k 55-64: $69k Over 65: $62k Making $100k/year is still a flex 😳
English
40
35
788
47.4K
Simon Dixon
Simon Dixon@SimonDixonTwitt·
People clapping like seals at a Bitcoin conference while a Cantor Fitzgerald constructed, Epstein-class Wall Street wrapper loads up Tether-collateralized debt into a Bitcoin treasury company. This is a securitized exit, designed to margin-call you the moment the financial-industrial complex moves Bitcoin against the $2.1 billion in leverage. Once you go public and rely on debt, you don’t run your company, the financial industrial complex do. You don’t leave the mafia. You become a FIC asset. It’s not personal. Its architecture. As I said would happen.
DeathOnTheStairs@Up_The_Bracket1

Looks like @SimonDixonTwitt got it right again… TwentyOne & @Strike are going to merge. We should have a bitcoin faucet in the name of Simon, kinda like the “Alex Jones was right again money jar” youtu.be/dEsSHoHZRH0

English
62
124
856
74.7K
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
The one thing that Saylor will never have is proof of reserves. See you over in the upper right part of the grid $XXI
Zaid 🟧@zaidlikesmstr

$MSTR The difference in communication style between Saylor and Jack Mallers is worth studying. Yesterday was a good example of why. Mallers made some comments about Saylor that sparked a lot of debate. The implication was that @Strategy had run out of cheap capital and had been forced into paying 11% to finance its Bitcoin buys. That was a flawed read. Saylor didn’t move away from convertible bonds because he lost access to them. He moved because $STRC is a fundamentally better instrument for his investors. The capital never comes due. It’s perpetual. Strategy owes the yield, not the principal. The distinction matters. A lot. But the bigger point isn’t the technicality. It’s what followed. After the pushback, Mallers spent time across several threads clarifying that he wasn’t implying what everyone read him as implying. Whatever the intention, it came across as backtracking. And in capital markets, backtracking reads as immaturity. You rarely if ever see Saylor do that. He is precise with his words, deliberate with his timing, and disciplined about what he leaves unsaid. His presence on X is almost strategically sparse. Short responses. No open wounds for skeptics to pick at. Someone who understands that every public appearance is a signal to investors.. Saylor has also evolved. Early on he was openly dismissive of the broader crypto ecosystem. He’s since learned that there is room for competing technologies. Crypto tokens like Ethereum, Solana and others have tokenization layers they can compete for. He’s embraced that. His tone has shifted from skepticism to something far more measured and generous. That evolution also speaks to maturity. Jack is an empowering voice in this space and I have no doubt his conviction is genuine. But how a company’s leader conducts themselves publicly is a signal. Saylor has spent six years setting that standard. It’s a template worth studying. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

English
0
0
1
155
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
@DividendBreeder I forgo any % over match of the 401k company and use the extra to stack sats in strike. Daily cost average.
English
0
0
0
6
The Dividend Breeder
The Dividend Breeder@DividendBreeder·
My company 401K match starts in May after 6 months of service. It’s a 4% match, which seems pretty standard. I currently contribute 10% but when the match kicks in I’m going to pull back to 8% and still have an increase in total contribution when the 4% match is added.
English
21
1
127
62K
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
@ElektronEnergy Where do you guys mine Bitcoin? What type of miners do you guys use?
English
0
0
0
57
TyMoTrilla أُعيد تغريده
Tether
Tether@tether·
Tether Investments Proposes Merger Plans at Twenty-One Capital to Accelerate its Strategic Direction Read more: tether.io/news/tether-in…
English
31
49
394
95.9K
Adrian Morris
Adrian Morris@_Adrian·
Comments like this from someone like Jack Mallers are quite frustrating. @saylor | @Strategy could issue another 0% convert tomorrow. There was never and has never been any sign of exhaustion for converts and the market kept buying the embedded call option on $MSTR because of the volatility. They aren't issuing 10% + on $STRC because they don't have market interest in converts. Saylor is targeting a yield starved cohort to fund buying $BTC. It's really that simple. Strategy pivoted toward perpetual preferreds like $STRC because the true economic cost of the Bonds isn’t the coupon, it’s the constant short pressure from convert arb hedging and the related dynamics it creates with DEX | GEX. Convert arb funds buy the bonds, long the cheap vol | equity option & then delta-hedge by shorting $MSTR proportional to the bond’s delta. The converts are long gamma (convexity) making the hedge dynamic. So if $MSTR rises, the delta increases, the bond holders arb by shorting more stock to stay neutral. If $MSTR falls, the delta decreases, so they cover their shorts. This creates persistent short interest (at times 45% of MSTR’s short interest is directly tied to convert arb) with constant sell on strength | buy on weakness activity that acts as a drag on upside moves while adding liquidity on dips. This is gamma scalping | vol arbitrage at its finest; the coupon itself is almost irrelevant in this light. The Prefs sidestep this reality because they are not convertible into common & don’t create the same delta | gamma hedge pressure. Individuals running a $BTC Treasury Company should know this...
BitcoinTreasuries.NET@BTCtreasuries

JUST IN: $XXI CEO Jack Mallers just said Saylor "ran out of people willing to give him money at 0% and now has to pay 12%." 🤯 What Mallers missed: $STRC is perpetual. The principal never gets paid back. Saylor is porting fixed income capital into Bitcoin forever. 🔶

English
43
24
286
20.8K
TyMoTrilla أُعيد تغريده
BTC Bro
BTC Bro@BTC_broo·
The knee-jerk reaction to Jack’s comment is exactly what’s wrong with this community. You can disagree and debate all you want, but villainizing someone who has supported bitcoin adoption for a decade because he has a different perspective on lending leaves me scratching my head. I maintain that Saylor has been a net positive for bitcoin, and I have held $MSTR since 2023. That said, it is alarming to see how many people treat Saylor like an infallible God. He is a big boy who can defend himself. If he feels Jack’s statement is out of line, I’m sure he’ll address it. Many of you have become emotional about your investment. It’s time to touch grass.
English
24
4
78
4K
AA ⚡️
AA ⚡️@AAStack·
Just Pause my Daily DCA with @Strike and activated my Daily DCA with @River. Why? Because words have power. Chose them wisely
AA ⚡️ tweet mediaAA ⚡️ tweet media
English
68
7
261
32K
TyMoTrilla
TyMoTrilla@tbone8ty·
@mikewmunz Strike is the best Bitcoin platform. Period. It has made so much progress over the past few months It is the bank account now. What has strike backtracked on again? Look at all these strategy minions coming out of the wood work with their panties in a bunch.
English
0
0
3
296
MikeWMunz 🟧
MikeWMunz 🟧@mikewmunz·
I like Jack. He’s one of the most hard nosed Bitcoiners out there. He’s done a lot of great things But This take is extremely disingenuous mainly because he’s salty that XXI has done absolutely nothing. Strike has backtracked their mission of making a universal Bitcoin/Fiat bank account in favor of OTC and trading. Strategy didn’t run out of people willing to lend at 0%. There never was anyone willing to lend at 0%. They ran out of convertible bond buyers because the market is tiny. They went in favor of a market not worth $200 Billion, but $300 Trillion+. 3 orders of magnitude larger. In the end, convertible bond buyers don’t help the equity the way they want them to. It’s great for immediate injection of capital to leverage up on, but doesn’t create sustainable financing into the future that is good for the company. It’s short term thinking. Of all people, Jack should know this. At this point in time, Saylor is running laps around him. Don’t take your saltiness out on him. How about just be better. x.com/BTCtreasuries/…
English
42
16
390
23.3K
Dr. Sydney Watson
Dr. Sydney Watson@SydneyLWatson·
Seen a lot of conversation about how predatory the American medical system is. So I will weigh in. I ended up going to the ER about 2 weeks ago for crippling pain. Turned out to be a ruptured ovarian cyst. I was there for MAYBE 4 hours. My bill? $13,500 dollars. Because I'm uninsured (by choice, that shit is a SCAM), the hospital dropped my bill down to $8,100 and some change as an "uninsured" discount. For starters, $13,500 for a 4 hour hospital visit is insane as it is. But the fact the hospital can wipe $5,000 off the bill "just because" should show you how utterly fucked this system is. And to be clear - $8,000 is still an absolutely insane sum of money when all these people did was scan my stomach and give me some pain killers. On my itemized bill, my CT scan was 7k. The iodine they used was $900. Just being in the ER room alone was $2,500. We phoned the hospital to haggle. They dropped the price by $20. Normal people can't survive this shit. I do okay and $8,000 is still an INSANE chunk of money out of my savings. Anyone who argues this isn't a disgusting, predatory system is crazy. And it is even crazier that Americans accept this. And for those of you who argue this is the free market, I need you to be quiet. There can never be a true free market here when government and insurance have their creepy little fingers in this pie. People shouldn't go bankrupt trying to pay medical bills. This has to change.
Dr. Sydney Watson tweet media
English
4K
3.9K
26.5K
1.4M