Sooothing

看到很多人质疑Ethena 27% APY会不会成为Terra2.0，来进行一个简单稳定币科普。

Insc+ ath I could drop insc+ alpha but peoples barnacle brains probally wont even be able to comprehend it. All ill say is insc+ pfp collection. I warned pandora from the start. Heads going to crack. $insc+ $pandora. dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x2da…

@ins_evm this can be big

The content of #ERC7583 has been updated, and we sincerely invite everyone to join the forum to share your views and opinions. ethereum-magicians.org/t/discussion-o… #ERC7583 represents an innovative implementation of the #BRC20 protocol within the #EVM, marking the birth of truly inscribed assets on the EVM. This advancement means that all enthusiasts of #inscription can now trade inscriptions without relying on any centralized Indexer. Moreover, we have introduced a new capability for inscribed assets in the EVM—permanently inscribing data in the event data. With this change, #Ethereum NFTs officially enter a new era of inscribed NFTs🔥. For FT projects, #ERC7583 introduces a revolutionary trading model that allows #FT to be traded in bundles similar to #NFT. This mechanism is particularly beneficial in the early stages of a project's launch, as it allows builders to facilitate transactions without providing a large amount of liquidity for FTs, significantly reducing the initial startup costs of FT projects. As the project progresses to the later stages, large transactions can adopt the NFT trading mode. This not only circumvents potential price shock issues that may arise with #Dex but also brings a more flexible and efficient trading mechanism to the project. This new trading model opens up new possibilities for the development of FT projects. @Uniswap @CurveFinance @aave @MakerDAO @compoundfinance #DeFi #DefiSummer For NFT projects, the update to #ERC7583 marks a significant turning point, as it addresses the criticisms and challenges faced by NFTs due to insufficiently decentralized metadata. And With #ERC7583, NFTs can now be bound with FTs, thus granting NFTs unprecedented liquidity. This represents a valuable opportunity for all NFT projects to rejuvenate and expand their influence. Therefore, we strongly recommend that all NFT project parties actively participate in the discussion of #ERC7583, to collectively promote the development and prosperity of the NFT ecosystem. @BoredApeYC @moonbirds @pudgypenguins @doodles @lootproject @0n1Force @Azuki For full-chain game projects, #ERC7583, by allowing data to be directly inscribed in event data, provides game developers with great flexibility and space for creativity. For instance, developers can now embed executable files or any other form of data into event data, and then use the game engine to parse and execute these data, integrating complex, dynamic content directly into games. This technology not only significantly expands the functionality and interactivity of blockchain games but also offers new avenues for the decentralized storage of game designs and assets. Game developers can leverage this mechanism to create richer and more dynamic game worlds, making the assets and operations within the game more secure, transparent, and tamper-proof. @AxieInfinity @xpet_tech @Starknet @influenceth @MocaverseNFT @_p12_ @darkforest_eth

@ins_evm can we have an exact date?

Many people are concerned about $INSC+. We hereby clarify that $INVT is currently only used for testing. Our next priority is to activate the FT feature of $INSC+, and it won't take too long.

What is ERC404? (machine translation) 1. There are two most important standards on Ethereum: ERC-20 and ERC-721. ERC20 is used to issue coins, such as $SHIB, $PEPE, $APE, etc., which are all issued using the ERC20 standard; ERC721 (including improved ERC721A, etc.) is used to issue NFT, such as BAYC, Azuki, etc. are all issued using this standard. NFT. 2. NFT has the problem of indivisibility and insufficient liquidity. For this reason, many NFT fragmentation, staking and other liquidity-promoting services have been spawned, such as Blur, flooring, BendDao, etc., but these tinkerings have not solved the problem from the protocol level. On the contrary, it increases complexity and reduces security. 3. Coins issued using ERC20 do not have these problems. They are naturally divisible and have derived many gameplay methods such as defi. Can ERC20 features be introduced at the protocol level of NFT? An accidental mishap of bad code generated by ChatGPT mixed the two protocols together, which inspired the ERC404 team, led by @0xacme Wrote the first generation protocol standard of ERC404 and released the first ERC404-based project Pandora. 4. I immediately analyzed the contract code of ERC404 and found that many people on Agreement etc. I won’t tell you the code here, but try to introduce ERC404 in a language that liberal arts students can understand: (1) If I release a set of CryptoPunks project with a total of 10,000 units using the ERC404 standard, and you free mint two, you go to Opensea to check and find that the two NFTs in the wallet are CryptoPunk #3099 and CryptoPunk #3100, one It's the floor, and the other is a rare alien punk! You go to Uniswap to check again and there are 2 $CryptoPunk coins in your wallet. Note that there is no exchange of graphics and coins here, nor do you have 2 NFTs + 2 coins. The graphics here are the coins, and the coins are the graphics! (2) If you think CryptoPunk #3099 is not good-looking and want to sell it, you have two options: The first option is to go to Opensea to place an order to sell this NFT, which is the same as ordinary NFT transactions. The second option is to go to Uniswap to sell your 1 $CryptoPunk coin. Please note here that before you sell the coin, you must first transfer the Alienpunk NFT to another wallet, because when you sell it as a coin , the protocol does not know which NFT corresponding coin you want to sell, it will sell your last NFT corresponding coin first. (3) Or you are optimistic about this project in the long term and just want to sell some $CryptoPunk coins and keep the rest. You can sell only 0.2 $CryptoPunk coins on Uniswap (or 0.000001, which can be divided into up to 18 decimal places. Again, sell coins before transferring Alien Punk to other wallets, leaving only the floor), leaving 0.8 coins. But when you go to OpenSea to check, the floor NFT in your wallet is no longer there, because your total number of $CryptoPunk coins is less than 1, and your NFT has been burned. (4) After two days, the $CryptoPunk currency keeps rising. You feel that you have sold out. Fomo wants to buy more, so you go to Uniswap and buy 0.3 $CryptoPunk. At this time, your wallet has 0.8+0.3, a total of 1.1 $ CryptoPunk, you go to Opensea to check and find that there is another CryptoPunk NFT in your wallet, but this is no longer the original floor CryptoPunk #3099, but a new NFT that the protocol randomly mints for you, CryptoPunk #4062, a Hoodie, What a bad luck! So you quickly went to Opensea and sold the NFT at a high price. At this time, your wallet has no NFT, and only 0.1 $CryptoPunk coins are left. (5) From a global perspective, this project has a total of 10,000 $CryptoPunk coins, and ideally there will be a maximum of 10,000 CryptoPunk NFTs (all wallets are integer coins). 5. Of course, the above is the effect of the ideal ERC404 implementation. There are still some problems in the first-generation protocol, such as: (1) Every time a new NFT is generated by transferring tokens, a number is added to the original highest ID number, so that CryptoPunk #3099 will appear. After being burned, it will never come back. Instead, CryptoPunks #10001, #10002... will appear. , is no longer a fixed 10k image, which conflicts with the immutability (the most precious attribute) of 10k NFT. You can add unmintedid mapping to the protocol contract, and the id generated each time will be randomly selected from this mapping to solve this problem. (2) When the number of transferred coins exceeds 1, it is stupid to burn an NFT and mint a new NFT in the receiving wallet, instead of transferring an NFT + some change tokens. (I'm not talking about transferring via NFT, but sending transfer tokens). (3) Gas is very high, and many parts of the contract code can be optimized. 6. The technical strength of the ERC404 project side is very weak and currently only @0xacme One person is writing code. But there are good signs today. The project team has called on technical experts from all parties to participate in the improvement of the protocol and jointly contribute to open source efforts. from TYYYT @wutaner

@FroggyFriendNFT @OUchrisNFTs This is those dead cat jump nft project, can be profitable, dyor

Froggy Friends is taking a giant leap into ERC404 with our $TADPOLE launch. $TADPOLE is now open for trading! Official Contract address: 0xeCd48F326e70388D993694De59B4542cE8aF7649

Haven’t tweeted in a while, but I'm sooo excited about ERC404 and similar contracts. I can imagine there are a lot 100x opportunities here. It feels the same as Bitcoin's brc20. And I think there will be a lot of dead nft projects coming back and issuing tokens with ERC404 lmao

ERC404 - token standard not found. This new "standard" has opened up a Pandora's box on crypto twitter over the last couple of days. Is it an NFT, a fungible token, or both? Here's a simple explanation of what ERC404 tokens really are 🧵:

#新头像

@cjaymacy gm

Gm Web3 ☀️☕️ Have a great day 👊🏼

@AlecRapop gm

@Luking_sol gm

GM MY FRIENDS 💚 ☕️ 🫡

@nftomg_ gm

GM for the CULTure 🫡☀️

@iamlilou5 gm

Gm 🤍

@jay_bleezie gm

Gm☕️☀️

@Matt_GGWP gm

Gm. 🧙🏻‍♂️ The Recipe: -Consistency -Efficiency -Positivity

@0xPraxy gm

merge!!!

Happy merge day. Here’s some fun texts from over the years to celebrate $ETH