The Jewish Katniss

🧵🧵🧵ANTISEMITISM in THE NYC DOE 🚨 🚨Breaking - Son of former Advisor to PLO Chairman Yassar Arafat with ties to terrorist organizations linked to the antisemitic email that was sent to every member of the Department of Education in NYC. Yesterday, in a stunning example of the evident antisemitism plaguing the NYSPC the NYC DOE sent an email that contained a 12-page pdf titled "City Council Toolkit: Divestment Edition, which contained detailed instructions on how to Divest from Israel among other antisemitic and anti-american propaganda. IT WAS SENT TO EVERY EMPLOYEE. 🧵1 of 5

My statement on the planned attack targeting the White House and pro-Israel Members of Congress:

"Mayor Mamdani campaigned on a pledge to implement “universal” car-free “school streets” outside every school in the city — and now advocates are calling out his proposed budget for failing to do so." nyc.streetsblog.org/2026/06/17/cit… #promisesnotkept

@VividProwess Rest in Peace.

Remember Carmel Gat, who was kidnapped by Hamas on October 7 from her home. She was held hostage in a dark underground tunnel, where she was starved, tortured, and beaten. She was an innocent soul, yet they murdered her because she was Jewish. Never Again is now.

@nypost Enough with reparations. DEI was reparations. Stacy Abrahams received two-billion dollars. Let her share the wealth.

Federal government seeks to halt first US reperations program for black people trib.al/VrB8XQ9

Strike it down as unconstitutional.

@RabbiPoupko @RosieRose507 @DarializaforNY @RepEspaillat @dansenor @AIPAC @DemMaj4Israel @RitchieTorres @LoganLevkoff She’s disgusting.

Call me crazy, but if you are running to represent a district with 40,000 Jews, you should not have celebrated the worst massacre against Jews since the Holocaust. On October 8 th 2023, @DarializaforNY was already on the streets cheering for Intifada. Thank you @RepEspaillat for calling out this unforgivable hate.

I don’t know what happened to our President, and I wish I was wrong. As a matter of fact, I’ll be ecstatic to be wrong. Unfortunately, I have no reason to believe I am.

Marco Rubio is amazing, and a real friend of Israel and the Jewish people. May God bless him.

WHAT TO THINK OF THE MOU AND MORE ... I start from the proposition that this is among the worst places to have a reasoned and substantive discussion. It is one of the most uncivil places in our civil society. Not because of the platform itself, but because unbridled freedom, without some basic guiderails, attracts the good, the bad, and the ugly from all corners of the world, where the bad and the ugly are able to predominate. It's a form of hit-and-run anarchy. It's more French Revolution than American Revolution. From a governing perspective, that is why our Framers established a republic and not a pure democracy. Therefore, when it comes to discussing the MOU, there are some very good and thoughtful posts, including some I disagree with, but too much that has little to do with the substance of the MOU. I do not confuse legitimate criticism, even strongly worded criticism, with some of the vile bigotry and disinformation campaigns here, of which there is way too much. And the comment sections on many posts are of a kind that are truly hideous, and not all of it is from foreign bots. It is what it is. Further prefacing my thoughts on the MOU, I understand that the Democrat Party media and Democrat politicians, like the Woke Right and others, are less interested in the substance of the MOU and legitimate engagement than uninhibited political exploitation, opportunism, and ambition. The intent by some of these actors is to squelch open debate not promote it. As a practical matter, others undoubtedly feel somewhat hemmed in by concerns over friendships, alliances, social circumstances, connections in the administration, etc. Again, it is what it is. Understanding all of this, I urge those with serious and substantive opinions to keep at it. Don't be intimidated by any of it. I want to address some of the basics about the MOU from my perspective. I'll do so in parts, given the nature of the platform: 1. The roll out was unhelpful. I am not sure why the MOU was not released when signed, with the appropriate level of explanation and engagement with the public, but the result was too much debate about the debate and admonishment of those commenting on available public information, including from legitimate media sources and administration leaks, not to mention the vice president's ubiquitous public appearances. As it turns out, much of what was discussed by serious people was fairly accurate. And since the MOU would eventually be released anyway, it was a mistake to start with the bravado before its release. 2. I start from the premise that there is a stubborn disinterest, by too many officials and media commentators, in truly understanding the nature of this enemy, its political-theocratic ideology, its history of negotiating techniques and objectives, and decades of manipulation of Western leaders and diplomats, which has infected every diplomatic engagement and outcome with it, in small ways and large, for nearly half a century. There is an abundance of publicly available information, including books, essays, speeches, and the like, explaining in detail the cause, revolution, and mindset of this enemy -- produced and circulated by the enemy itself as well as those who have studied its behavior in earnest. The enemy repeatedly defines itself. But beyond the usual sloganeering in the media about how bad the enemy is, I hear few explanations to the public with any depth. I draw at least three conclusions from this (I'm sure more will come to mind as the day goes on): a) too few understand precisely what we are dealing with, and that is/was by choice; b) it is thought to be, or may well be, too difficult politically to, in the end, effectively tackle what is an existential threat once it is fully understood; c). few of those who do see clearly what is ahead understand what Winston Churchill meant by his wilderness years and choose to avoid it. This goes to a bigger issue of much greater concern: Do we, as a people, have the will to destroy an enemy that exists to annihilate us and do our politicians and diplomats simply reflect this. Polling suggests we do not and most of our ruling class lives and dies by polling. 3. Before commenting directly on the MOU, context here is critical. When President Trump decided to go to war with the Iranian regime, it was a courageous decision by every measure. He has known and made clear for decades that Iran poses a grave threat to our country and criticized the failure of presidents to deal with it. Indeed, I first met President Trump in September 2015 at a rally of the Tea Party Patriots on the steps of the Capitol Building. Several of us spoke that day to a crowd of many thousands against the Obama nuclear deal and urged Congress to defeat it. The most eloquent and inspiring speech was delivered by Donald Trump. He made the moral and national security case for defeating the Iranian regime and against Obama's sellout. He knew intuitively and by watching what the Iranian regime was doing and had done that it must be denied nuclear weapons no matter the cost. Despite the knowingly false allegations of very evil propagandists, the president has never wavered from this position and was not convinced or pulled dragging and kicking by Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, or "the Jews" to fight this war. MORE TO COME ...

I don’t think people fully realize how Israelis are feeling right now A mix of despair, fear, and heartbreak. We have lost over 2000 people to this war, and it feels we are still in great danger.

🚨 James O'Keefe uncovered a Rutgers University professor in an Antifa Signal Chat, but it's not her first rodeo. Professor Zainab Tanvir, another shining scholar who arrived in America from Lahore, Pakistan, has a long history with radical "activism." During the wave of Tesla riots across America, which saw multiple vehicles lit on fire, she joined the far-left radical '50501' organization to scream her brains out against Elon Musk. Rutgers University fleeced American taxpayers for $518.2 MILLION last year, and that's just for scientific research. Some of the things discussed inside of this Signal chat were concrete plans for violent resistance, impeding ICE operations, and celebrating the ass*ssination of Charlie Kirk. When will our Department of Education address the epidemic of taxpayer-funded professors who blur the line between educator and domestic terrorism? @EDSecMcMahon H/T @JamesOKeefeIII

Terrorists are called terrorists for good reason

Iran-backed terror network paying teenage gunmen to shoot Jewish targets in Toronto. Congratulations on globalizing your intifada. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…

"America Only" is Duginist Russian propaganda meant to work against American interests, not just by dividing Trump's type of "America First" but by encouraging us not to get involved in our interests abroad, leaving gaps and vacuums for the new Axis to fill.

SMOKY MOUNTAIN SWEEP! ICE Nabs 117 Illegal Immigrants in Weeklong Tennessee Operation hannity.com/media-room/smo…

Why is this not the BIGGEST Story in the media right now? Absolutely sickening report. 250,000 children.

@Adi13 This is what Qatar funding looks like: nypost.com/2024/07/13/us-…

This is horrible. They paid our universities to indoctrinate our youth and our schools to indoctrinate our children. What could possibly go wrong?

Today's cover: The US just revealed details of the secretive US-Iran MOU agreement. trib.al/9HZ8V5C