Walnut Ave Value

6.7K posts

Walnut Ave Value

Walnut Ave Value

@walnutavevalue

This is NOT investment advice. May The Odds Be Ever in Your Favor

SF Bay Area, CA انضم Mart 2018
872 يتبع4.2K المتابعون
Unai Arregui
Unai Arregui@Arregius·
#GDWN unfortunate trading update today that confirms doubling PBT YoY… with some lost tenders War uncertainty caused delays, duvelco ramp up delayed as sell cyle is quite long in this case… No contracts lost btw. Easat has plenty of bids… and las week all was great. #long
Unai Arregui tweet mediaUnai Arregui tweet media
English
1
1
14
1.1K
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
@nachkari Reta being given around like candy by sf Bay Area fitness instructors
English
0
0
0
74
Walnut Ave Value أُعيد تغريده
surprised trader
surprised trader@surprised_trade·
Oil & gas to stay higher for longer. More than 40 energy assets across nine countries in the Middle East have been "severely or very severely" damaged by the war, potentially prolonging disruptions to global supply chains. The damage to oil fields, refineries and pipelines means it will take some time for them to come back online. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
0
3
6
684
Mr SB CFA, CISI
Mr SB CFA, CISI@MrShitbagger·
It’s not being right or wrong. It’s about how small are losses when wrong Last 6 weeks of crap mkt Win ONDS 12% LGS 11% NVT 18% Lose TONIE -6% MSI 0% MGNS -9% RR 0% GAW 3.5% VLX -2% AOP -1% AT -6% TW -3% GDWN -3% MHA -7% SRFM -6% PPIH -6% NVT -2% KTOS -4% FLRK 4% AVEG 0%
GIF
English
1
0
4
1.4K
Walnut Ave Value أُعيد تغريده
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
Chevron CEO Mike Wirth says the physical oil market is tighter than the financial oil market is reflecting, particularly for refined products. The scarcity, particularly in Asia, is “not fully priced in the oil futures curve,” he says. #CERAWeek
English
50
570
2.6K
386.1K
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
3P or wholesale stores have high ROIC, higher margin, and their count is growing This reminds me a bit of NATH
Walnut Ave Value tweet media
English
1
0
1
804
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
Revenue mix and profitability view $bbw
Walnut Ave Value tweet media
English
1
1
1
3K
Atoms Not Bits
Atoms Not Bits@AtomsNotBits·
Breaking: The U.S. Army placed a $52M+ order for over 2,500 Skydio X10D drones, the largest single vendor tactical sUAS order in Army history, moving from bid to award in under 72 hours.
English
2
7
86
25K
Rhomboid1🇺🇦
Rhomboid1🇺🇦@rhomboid1MF·
I think doing relentlessly physical stuff that is hard to automate…imho the key thing is that it shouldn’t be formulaic but reliant on embedded knowledge ..basically be a plumber
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.

English
3
0
10
2.9K
Alex
Alex@Alex_Intel_·
@walnutavevalue @SteakandChickn @QEDvinci @ContrarianCurse Well I don't know how TSMC actually did their nighttime r&d. But most process experiments take more than a shift. So someone on shift will try something out and then comeback on their shift and have their data Wei-Jen Lo is making changes ik
English
1
0
1
96
SuspendedCap
SuspendedCap@ContrarianCurse·
First of all, you can’t turn iterations for 6-8w at 2nm, there is 1k+ steps, can’t speed up dep or EUV any further “I’ll just delete steps”. Those steps are ruthlessly optimized in surface of reducing defect density and boosting yields - which is critically important with this type of capital intensity Even TSM took 3y to ramp 2nm and that is with essentially a monopoly on the talent base to pull it off +40 years of accumulated know-how and recipes This is quite literally impossible. Better off spending that capital on prepays for capacity
Elon Musk@elonmusk

Given that several companies make advanced chips, but no companies have ever made fully reusable rockets or achieved SpaceX scale, I think Starship is harder, but we shall see. Terafab will technically be two fabs, each making only one chip design. This greatly simplifies process flow and allows more linear, adjacent movement of the FOUP. A super high production rate allows us to test very quickly what steps can be deleted, simplified or sped up, even after the design is fixed. Current fabs are extremely conservative, operating on rigid historical heuristics, which are mostly, but not all, correct. Anything that is a rate limiter at the machine level means that machine will be redesigned, unless already at limit of physics. Having new iterations of a chip design be produced every day in the research fab (with <7 day lag) means being able to try out many high risk, high return ideas. Etc In any event, there is no other way to reach extreme scale, so either we make Terafab or we will be stuck at the ~20% chip/memory output growth per year of the current industry.

English
25
9
184
42.9K
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
There’s something to be said about basic human decency - even to your opponent. This is bedrock of western values
English
1
0
2
249
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
@Alex_Intel_ @SteakandChickn @QEDvinci @ContrarianCurse And buying IP alone won’t solve it as GF found when tries to copy Samsung process (was it 7nm)? Intel doing process development in shifts now? (I am not saying factory ops) Another confounding piece was logic and memory in one fab. Get outta here!
English
1
0
0
83
Alex
Alex@Alex_Intel_·
@SteakandChickn @QEDvinci @walnutavevalue @ContrarianCurse lol Most serious people at foundries are masters and Phd people. He can throw some money at people, but most are just interested in the subsector they wrote their Phd paper on. No fab/tools until 2028. Even then its a 'dirty fab', so why is PVD not working who knows!
English
1
0
0
94
Walnut Ave Value
Walnut Ave Value@walnutavevalue·
@nachkari He’s terrible. Not sure why people think he’s good at investing or policy
English
0
0
1
43