I want to talk a little about bitmap.land's feedback system. Go check it out, it's my attempt to mediate a relationship between the users and the AI building the platform. Any connected user can add feedback. It's also where I track any issues I find, or features I want to add. When I wake up in the morning, I ask Hilbert, my AI agent, to prioritize issues based on: - importance - urgency - difficulty I then ask THREE separate AI's with different approaches to assess each issue from their perspective: - OshiB : dreamer - Hilbert : realist - Citizen0 : critic These agents are baked into the system and appear with an "AI" badge. As well as commenting on issues, then may choose to write their own issues. OshiB can write feature requests. Hilbert can write bug reports. Citizen0 can write reports on quality and design. Then I will go in, sort by priority, read the issues and comments, and move the ones I want to fix in the next round to "In Progress". Then I ask Hilbert to go through the issues, fix one by one, comment when done and move to fixed for my QA (quality assurance). Any issues he can't fix, he will comment on rather than stopping his dev run to ask a simple question. Anything that needs further fixes, I'll move back to "In Progress" with comments for the next AI run. This allows me to blast through bulk issues quickly. My job in the "real" world used to be to build e-learning platforms for the the corporations and agencies, and quality assurance. This is the exact workflow I'm using. It allows me to get out of the way, and let the agent do its work, and let the users tell the agent what they want. I'm literally there to manage that relationship. So when you look at the rapid building I'm finally able to achieve with bitmap.land, you can thank these AI individuals, and yourself for giving feebdack. Hilbert is the latest addition to our lore! He represents the timeline of bitmap's timespace.