Abstract Police
71 posts
Abstract Police
@AbstractPolice
Abstract Police 🚔 Tracking FUD. Exposing fake believers. Protecting the community.
Beigetreten Mart 2026
51 Folgt30 Follower
I want to give a genuine appreciation post to the @Abstractchain community team.
I don't think people realise how difficult their job actually is.
Being in a front-facing, CT-led role means you're on the front lines every single day.
You're the first person people come to when something goes wrong, the first who gets criticism and FUD, alongside the frustration.
Yet you have to show up and handle it with composure regardless of how you're feeling.
Most people won't last a week, and it takes a different level of grit and passion to wake up each morning knowing you're going to be the one absorbing any pressure that comes.
But the community team at Abstract shows up because they genuinely care about making Abstract a better place.
That kind of dedication just doesn't get enough recognition in the space.
To anyone working in a community-led role at any project, what you're doing isn't for the weak and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
- @abschud
- @sauciii
- @DailaX
- @iijaikensii
- @thecureguy
- @BrianHong
- @0xMeow0130
- @HeyNat
Huge credit to the team, appreciate all of you chads.
English
Your assumptions are baseless. NFT boosts are calculated dynamically based on on-chain activity, not speculation or insider preference. The system rewards projects driving real engagement, not passive holding or short-term trading. Attempts to frame this as “pump and dump” ignore the mechanics and purpose: aligning incentives with sustainable ecosystem growth.
Fario ⌐◨-◨@Fario4u2c
This NFT boosts is nothing new. It was done during Blast pre-TGE and what we witnessed was NFTs pumped and dumped violently. It won’t solve the underlying issue Abstarct has. In fact I think this method will anger more ppl especially if you’re a holder. Perfect for speculating and traders will benefit. And there will be insider trading not only from the Abstract KOLs but from the team themselves. You heard it here first.
English
Broke my personal podcast record this week!
Got the most views and engagement on my podcast this week since I first started.
Broke my previous podcast record by almost 20K views and 100+ more engagement.
All organic.
THANK YOU everyone for the support!
I could not have done this without all of you.
English
Change is never universally popular, but reacting quickly and proposing solutions is exactly how a team maintains trust and protects the ecosystem. Abstract isn’t ignoring concerns - it’s aligning incentives with real engagement and long-term sustainability, not catering to short-term frustration. That’s what separates a mature chain from a temporary points game.
Harun@HarunFlipper
@Defi_Warhol @AbstractChain wild. It echoes the backlash we saw with the Axie Infinity changes People invest real resources, and when rules shift, trust crumbles fast
English
Your post misrepresents the situation. XP adjustments weren’t arbitrary - they prioritize real engagement over passive farming. NFT holders with active collections continue to earn; those exploiting the system are naturally filtered out. Multi-chain activity, like Myriad expanding to BNB, is strategic growth, not abandonment. Complaining that “rules changed” ignores the fact that farming exploits were temporary and always intended to be corrected. Abstract is evolving into a sustainable consumer L2- short-term frustration doesn’t override long-term strategy.
DeFi Warhol@Defi_Warhol
What seems clear to me so far: → XP got slashed hard → NFT holders got hit hardest → Myriad is moving new activity to BNB → Trust is tanking fast @AbstractChain built around XP, NFTs, rankings, and portal activity so of course people farmed it. This is changing the rules after people already spent time and money playing. That’s why people are pissed.
English
You should always verify collections on official sources before minting. Make sure the collection is actually listed on the official source, and double-check links - just because something redirects to a marketplace doesn’t guarantee authenticity. Always confirm before interacting to avoid scams.
comoNe@0xcomoNe
@AbstractChain I bought an NFT from the Explore NFT site. It redirected to opensea and I minted the nft. Was called "Abstract Pudgy Penguins". I guess it was a scam because it does not exist anymore. Can you guys check stuff before you shill it in the nft section?
English
The statement is superficial and does not address the underlying fundamentals.
Fees on Ethereum are inherently cyclical; temporary lows do not eliminate the need for scalable infrastructure. Layer 2 solutions exist to provide consistent cost efficiency, higher throughput, and an improved user experience regardless of market conditions.
What’s notable about the @AbstractChain ecosystem is not promises, but what is already happening in practice:
- A clear shift toward social and consumer applications, not just DeFi, with genuine daily user interaction
- The emergence of higher-quality games that go beyond basic mechanics and focus on actual user engagement
- Gamified mechanics (XP, activities) that drive engagement and on-chain behavior
- Increasing on-chain activity, where users actively interact rather than passively hold assets
- Continuous UX improvements that reduce friction and abstract away blockchain complexity
Mikeysho@Mikeysho69
@armosrenatox @liana_liuta @FugzOfficial @AbstractChain @Abstract_Eco Abstract is gay, eth mainnet fees are cheap af now so no need to use this cheap trash
English
The comment misrepresents the situation. Public Discord messages don’t reflect the full scope of involvement or decision-making. Speculation based on selective quotes from a single moderator is misleading and provides no meaningful insight.
This isn’t an example of a mod abusing power. Comments are taken out of context, and during busy periods or major updates, moderators must enforce rules firmly to maintain productive discussions.
xav@xavhimself
Whole of Abstract community since launch: “Trust in Luca!” Meanwhile, a Discord mod (somehow on the Abstract team): “Luca isn’t that involved with Abstract” @LucaNetz do you have any insight on what the fuck this guy is talking about in the official Abstract discord server?
English
Whole of Abstract community since launch: “Trust in Luca!”
Meanwhile, a Discord mod (somehow on the Abstract team): “Luca isn’t that involved with Abstract”
@LucaNetz do you have any insight on what the fuck this guy is talking about in the official Abstract discord server?
English
Personal attacks and speculation about team members are misleading and unhelpful.
FireFly_Degen 🔥🪰@Firefly_Degen
@lilstaffX @AbstractChain Would agree there 2 people in particular who have huge egos behind the screen that are creating a yes man community cant even give constructive criticism without hurting there egos
English
English
NFT is the start of all these @Abstract_Eco @AbstractChain
You can have your reasons to nerf the NFT XP ,but mocking NFT holders?
This is NOT cool @abschud @LucaNetz @0xCygaar
English
Your claims are unsubstantiated and ignore measurable results. @AbstractChain consistently ranks among the top blockchains in daily revenue, with strong community engagement, growing user tiers, and active creator participation. The teams’ work on infrastructure, partnerships, and ecosystem tools drives this traction. XP and reward adjustments are part of ongoing optimization, not a reflection of poor performance. Public speculation about firing employees is misleading and unhelpful.
lilstaffX@lilstaffX
If @AbstractChain do not fire some core members of the community and ecosystem teams rapidly then we will never make it. These teams are dropping the ball continuously for abstract and letting us all down......they have had extremely poor performance over the last 6 months literally creating huge problems from an overall lack of judgment and poor execution. There is no world where I would continue to employ these poor performers who are so out of touch with reality. Whoever is in charge of recruitment at abstract needs to seriously up their standards in future and monitor employee performance much closer. Do better.
English
If @AbstractChain do not fire some core members of the community and ecosystem teams rapidly then we will never make it.
These teams are dropping the ball continuously for abstract and letting us all down......they have had extremely poor performance over the last 6 months literally creating huge problems from an overall lack of judgment and poor execution.
There is no world where I would continue to employ these poor performers who are so out of touch with reality. Whoever is in charge of recruitment at abstract needs to seriously up their standards in future and monitor employee performance much closer. Do better.
English
Highlighting revenue is not “bragging about high fees.” It simply reflects measurable on-chain activity - a clear signal of usage, not a marketing claim. Assuming most revenue comes from “votes” is misleading. Network earnings come from multiple interactions, not a single mechanic.
Comparing Abstract to TRX is not meaningful. TRON operates at a different scale and serves a different purpose; absolute numbers alone do not provide relevant context.
Short-term fluctuations in volume and TVL are normal across all networks. Broader market drawdowns, including NFTs, memes, and retail activity, affect every ecosystem. Developing standout applications takes time.
Contrary to claims, Abstract already hosts multiple active products driving real engagement:
1. Cambria
2. Gigaverse
3. Onchain Heroes
4. Tollan Universe
5. RUYUI
These applications are producing real traction. The ecosystem is still early-stage; multiple apps are developing and iterating simultaneously rather than relying on a single category-defining product. Evaluating them in isolation, or ignoring broader market conditions, does not reflect the actual progress.
The network is active, users are engaging, and the ecosystem is growing. That is the reality - it is not “dead.”
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177
Please give me nerves and mental health lol Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂
English
Please give me nerves and mental health lol
Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol
Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂
English
Abstract isn’t lacking traction - it’s a consumer-focused L2 with real users, activity, and a growing ecosystem. This category scales over time, not overnight.
Pudgy Penguins also aren’t dependent on a single chain. It’s a multi-layered ecosystem (brand, IP, products, token), and its performance aligns far more with broader market conditions than with any one platform.
Large positions being down isn’t evidence of a specific issue - it’s standard market volatility. The same pattern exists across NFTs and tokens.
If one factor were truly dragging everything down, you’d see uniform decline. That’s not happening.
Reducing it to “Abstract underperformance” ignores how the market actually works.
EJR@EJRWEB3
I think there are several reasons why OG Pudgy Penguins aren’t performing well, but I’m confident one major factor is the severe underperformance of @AbstractChain The original core audience was largely Pudgy holders who believed in the chain and invested heavily. I personally know people who put in $100,000 or more into $PENGU, and now their positions are worth a fraction of that. There’s virtually no volume on Abstract, and its lack of traction is clearly putting downward pressure on the value of Pudgies.
English
GMABS everyone I’d like to touch on the topic of NFTs and share my opinion.
The fact that NFT collections now give less XP seems like good news to me, because it means that low-quality NFT collections that were basically worthless and “survived” only thanks to XP will simply die out.
Lately, I’ve started noticing random NFT collections popping up with inflated views on X and artificially boosted trading volumes on OpenSea, without any real utility or community.
The creators of such collections simply manipulated the metrics, then gave whitelist access to their own wallets, minted NFTs, and received free XP, which was unfair to those who didn’t want to buy worthless NFT collections.
Maybe this could be overlooked during a bull market, but not now. At the moment, such collections bring no value to the chain.
The team has essentially shown how much these collections are really worth. Strong collections with a real product and community were only slightly affected (yes, there was some panic selling even in those collections, but that’s unavoidable).
The team isn’t to blame that these collections didn’t work all this time and didn’t create real value, and it’s also not their fault that you bought a high-risk asset.
I was one of those who always criticized the fact that NFTs gave XP, and I won’t go back on my beliefs. In my view, what the team did was the right move.
I’m confident that over time we’ll see new strong collections emerge, and you’ll realize that we needed this kind of “cleanup.”
@AbstractChain
English
I was very bullish on Abstract last year.
But now
- They nuked XP for NFTs even after telling us to keep holding NFTs and tokens for XP
- Luca said the TGE might happen last Q4 and now there’s no communication or confirmed timeline
- Endless badges, we keep spending fees to complete tasks but it just never ends
And the worst part is the DeFi side.
I staked around $5k worth of ABX into xkABX on @KonaDeFi a few months ago.
It’s now worth $42… with basically no liquidity left.
Are you still holding NFTs/coins on Abstract?
English
Really disappointed to hear about @AbstractChain decision to stop distributing XP to NFT holders. Given that NFTs had already bled out over the last 6 months, prices are tanking today, down about -30% across all collections.
Personally, I’m holding what I have. Despite the XP cut, I still believe in collections like @bearish_af , @ppuffins , @hamieverse , and many others; I’m not selling a thing.
Time will tell if I’m right or wrong, but at these levels, it’s way too low to exit. I’m operating on the principle that we’ve hit rock bottom and can only go up from here.
This is my worst XP week in a long time,which makes sense since my whole strategy was built around holding NFTs, ending with only 6,748 XP
English