A.H Nielsen

I asked chatgpt to come up with lyrics to a lead single for a 3rd Biggie album we never got:

@AndrewZywiecMD Why is every single one of your posts complete and utter nonsense?

SSRIs cause not only suicidal thoughts, but homicidal thoughts. They make you think dark, dangerous things. Like killing your girlfriend, or your family members. Many people on these drugs don't feel safe around others because of these thoughts. Add in the gaslighting psychiatrists who tell them their brain is broken, amd it is a recipe for anxiety and depression and isolation. GET OFF THESE DRUGS.

@ClassicJukeboxx @DoctorTro Funny how the data doesn't show that... It actually shows they lower their risk of all of those things because they lose weight

@Assbear100 @DoctorTro Until the get cancer, heart disease, severe lethargy, or gain the fat back once they run out of money...

The Nightmare of Modern Medicine revealed… 🚨 Join me for story time 🚨 Doctor: We’re starting you on a GLP-1. 1 week later Patient: I’m nauseous and vomiting. Doctor: Take Zofran. 1 week later Patient: I’m constipated. Doctor: Take Metamucil. 1 month later Patient: I’m losing strength and muscle. Doctor: Let’s start testosterone. 1 month later Patient: My labs show high RBC and hemoglobin. Doctor: Donate blood. 1 season later Patient: Now I’m anemic. Doctor: Let’s do iron infusions. 1 season later Patient: I feel depressed from all of this. Doctor: Start an SSRI. 1 season later Patient: No sex drive. Erectile dysfunction. Brain fog. Doctor: Add Cialis. And let’s try an experimental Alzheimer’s drug. — No one asked: • Why did we suppress appetite pharmacologically? • Why did lean mass drop? • Why did erythrocytosis occur? • Why did anemia follow? • Why is mood collapsing? One injection becomes: Antiemetic → Laxative → Hormone → Phlebotomy → Iron → SSRI → PDE5 inhibitor → Cognitive drug. Side effect → Prescription → Side effect → Prescription. Polypharmacy as protocol. My advice: find real doctors, be wary of polypharmacy

A massive Swedish study followed 30,000 women for over 20 years and found that those who actively sought sun exposure had dramatically lower death rates from cancer, heart disease, and all causes. The shocking part? Sun avoiders had roughly double the overall mortality. Even heavy smokers who got plenty of sun had similar death rates to non-smokers who avoided it. Sunlight appears to extend life through vitamin D, nitric oxide, and immune support - yet we're still told to hide from it. Are you getting enough sun?

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 I can show you numerous randomized control trials, large cohort studies and meta analysis showing seed oils outperform butter on just about any health metric and disease/mortality risk, but you can't find me a human study showing they cause harm, independent of a calorie surplus

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 I'm not interested in mechanistic research. I'm only interested in actual human outcome data and nothing else. Show me evidence that cooking in seed oils leads to worse outcomes in humans than vs cooking in some kind of saturated fat. Until you can do that, I'm done here.

Seed-oil and soy defender, btw.

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 Did you even look it up yourself before telling me to do so? From what you provided, the very first study that shows up leans in the direction that seed oils are beneficial🫤

@Assbear100 @Babygravy9 I'm at work, try reading instead of arguing on twitter. letmegooglethat.com/?q=pubmed+seed…

@Nigerian_Hiphop Dre has an endless catalogue of the sickest beats you'll ever hear

Dr. Dre Ft Snoop Dogg - Still D.R.E. (1999)

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 "Inflammation markes and cell membrane damage" you're getting closer. Now you need to provide evidence showing they cause those things in humans, regardless of a calorie surplus. I'm willing to change my stance if you can provide evidence for that, but I doubt you will

@Assbear100 @Babygravy9 You're so lazy it's honestly baffling, stay retarded I guess. If you're not interested in the topic to read through studies showing inflammation markers and cell membrane damage, then you do you.

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 So it's made up bs, got it. Thanks for clearing that up. I'm just gonna move on to someone else that can actually provide evidence for their claims. Anti seed oil people and evidence do not mix well somehow

@Assbear100 @Babygravy9 It's not on me to teach you, you're really entitled probably got everything handed to you in life.

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 You're claiming there's data to support seed oils exist, then you need to prove it. It's not on me to confirm or debunk your claim, when it's YOUR claim. Either you have evidence or you have made up bs.

@Assbear100 @Babygravy9 You're clearly disingenuous, and don't want to learn and see the actual data shown by your retarded example of the earth is flat. You are the worst kind of person to just defy science, simply because you're lazy and stupid. If you don't want to dig through data, then stfu.

@VeNoMzShibe @Babygravy9 "plenty of studies on pubmed" does not qualify as evidence. I can also tell you the earth is flat and that you can just look it up on google if you don't believe me, but that sounds silly to you, right? Provide some of those studies you claim exist or it means nothing.

@Assbear100 @Babygravy9 Plenty of studies on pubmed. Google is free to use if you want to learn lmao.

@HultgrienJ @DrMauinforma Mendelian Randomization says LDL is plenty causal of ASCVD on it's own. Those ribeyes cooked in butter do not qaulify as healthy.

@DrMauinforma Can we all say there is no peer reviewed clinical literature linking elevated LDL cholesterol ALONE to heart disease?

Can we all just agree that not lowering your high-risk patients’ LDL less than 55 mg/dl is malpractice?

@AmmousMD The benefit of data is that it doesn't lie. Can you proof you're actually telling the truth? I tend to think you're either making it up, or only seeing patients from the small subgroup of people that can't tolerate them and you being their last resort.

Until you've seen a dementia patient improve days after stopping their statin. Maybe sit this one out.

@bickdaddy @SeedOilDsrspctr Those studies don't completely remove SFAs or PUFAs completely, but rather swap a certain %. When you only use subjects of a certain population and randomize them, you'll get the same dietary habits between groups, so whatever result you get from swapping SFA with PUFA is useful

@Assbear100 @SeedOilDsrspctr Exactly. Small switch trials are useless when they're consuming a ton of seed oil outside of the study recipes. And you'd never be able to get a large study population to go zero

I’m at the point where I don’t believe any of these studies where people “didn’t eat seed oils”. So, they went to zero restaurants? Ate basically no food from packages? Never had salad dressing or used sauces? The only people NOT eating seed oils are those who are VERY specifically altering their lives in drastic ways, and people with crippling OCD and they only eat boiled cabbage or something. (Rare)

@ElieJarrougeMD Yes they are. If your LDL goes down, and everything else remains the same, you're objectively healthier than you were before

Doctors lowering your LDL just because it’s “high” aren’t treating your health. They’re treating a lab value. And a “normal” number doesn’t mean you’re actually healthy.

@DoctorTro Or get rid of fats. Low-carb is no better or worse than low-fat. It's the combination of excess fat and carbs that drives obesity and metabolic syndrome

Atkins was right Get rid of carbs

@bickdaddy @SeedOilDsrspctr Most of the studies (at least those comparing to saturated fat) doesn't look at completely zero intake, but rather a reduction/increase compared to saturated fat and then observe health effects. Some RCTs do swap in a 1:1 ratio through recipes

@SeedOilDsrspctr Seed oil studies are BS because you'd have to keep people in prison camps to keep them at zero

@JohnSmithupmq @nicknorwitz @BarteltLab He rutinely butchers studies to the extent where he's either doing it on purpose or simply has a very poor understanding of how to interpret sicientific literature. He's literally made claims about studies in mice as if he's not aware mice are like 3.000 times smaller than humans

I think he’s young excited and pushy. and yes he does use grifting tactics to get his reach higher. It’s how the algorithm works. I think at heart he’s a good guy with a vision. I don’t think he means bad, is avoiding evidence on purpose, or misleading anyone intentionally. Now if you disapprove of him and think he’s causing harm that’s a different conversation. But on an interpersonal level he’s just like you and me.

I’m a lipid biochemist by training and for 20 years I have been saying: The lower the LDL-C the better for you. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…