Classic Jukebox Band

@nicknorwitz @BarteltLab My opinion is to live like our ancestors who had zero heart disease. Health is not a scientific phenomenon, per se. It's an evolutionary one. This is why I got healthy when I quit listening to experts, and lived my life like a caveman, when it comes to food.

@BarteltLab Alexander, question: A 55 year-old woman walks in to your clinic with an LDL of 75 mg/dl. Positive CAC. Based on these data, do you transition from conventional to intensive management? What’s your expert opinion?

I’m a lipid biochemist by training and for 20 years I have been saying: The lower the LDL-C the better for you. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

@BarteltLab @nicknorwitz I like Norwitz, but using the qualifications argument is only going to fool stupid people. Qualified, science-types are the people who got us all fat and sick in the first place. Believe me, tens of thousands of doctors, PhD's, experts and scientists are full of shit.

@nicknorwitz Yes, I don’t want to talk to you and I don’t value your opinion. It’s Sunday and engaging in nonsense debates with the cholesterol keto grift team is a waste of time. In your clinic do what you think is right.

@AwakenedOutlaw Because the Rothschild-controlled media told us to?

Exactly this. We were ALWAYS going to have to confront Iran. Trump is the only President to do so - and in time to save the world from an actual doomsday scenario. He put America's citizens first because to do nothing would be akin to ingnoring this truth and putting political expediency in front of our longer-term safety. Not sure how some don't seem to grasp as much.

For years I have advocated looking for the true cause of chronic illnesses. Is the cause of diabetes a lack of metformin for instance??

@lowcarbGP The real reason is an evolutionary mismatch, not so much a scientific mismatch, like not enough drugs. Science chasers make this dumb mistake, assuming health is a scientific phenomenon. It's not. It's an evolutionary phenomenon.

@MichaelMindrum Exactly right, because all running animals, including humans get fit quicker as a result of intense exercise. Our ancestors had to run from danger, or run to eat. Natural selection selected us to get fit quick with intense exercise. We evolved from people who ran away.

The exercise prescription most of us learned was built around volume: 150 minutes a week, any movement counts, accumulate time and the benefits follow. For most chronic diseases, that serves well but for dementia and cardiovascular disease, data from nearly half a million people suggest that how hard you push matters more than how long you go. Let me explain. 🧵

@ForgiatoBlow47 E. The Rothschilds.

What is the biggest threat to America right now? A: Islam B: Communists C: Illegals D: All the above

The Federal Reserve system is a parasitic Ponzi scheme, modeled on the earlier Rothschild dominated Bank of England.

@DeanSmi47962704 Because they saw EXACTLY what we are seeing in the west today, and did something about it. Of course, we were lied to about it, and had to crush them, just like we are trying to crush Iran now for the same reason...

Why did such a highly educated Nation like Germany just randomly turn on the Jews? Ernst Zündel speaking in 1996.

This is heresy. No, it was founded on CHRISTIAN values. This government is occupied by a foreign nation. None of this is ok.

The actor and comedian Rob Schneider has urged the US government to “restore the military draft for our nation’s young people” amid the ongoing war with Iran. Footnote: Rob Schneider has never served in the US military.

YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really? First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation. No doubt, there are other reasons. There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security. Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not. In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime. This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.

@RealJamesWoods Good to see you are one of us, James.

Unfixable.

We're supposed to believe that "science" says vaccines are "safe and effective". But that is a meaningless claim. An individualized risk-benefit analysis is required for every child and every vaccine. And we're told the claim is supported by "well designed" studies while all those calling it into question are "flawed". But a simple comparison of criticisms and study design reveal that the sole criterion for determining whether a study is "well designed" or "flawed" is whether its findings can be cited to support official dogma or call it into question. jeremyrhammond.com/2025/12/08/sci…

Neat: Another PSM study found lower risk of Alzheimer's with versus without statins.

"The Amish basically have no obesity, no infertility, no cancer, no diabetes." "They've staved off every single health issue the rest of the world is dying from. Their obesity rate is only 4%, while it's 42% in the rest of America." "They have the highest fertility in the world, and they're doubling every 20 years." "We need to be learning from them more."

@gofinditwhy @DoctorTro As a truth seeker myself, I say avoid doctors. They are the real reason we are all fat and sick in the first place...

@DoctorTro Be cautious, but decisions should always be guided by a qualified doctor.

The Nightmare of Modern Medicine revealed… 🚨 Join me for story time 🚨 Doctor: We’re starting you on a GLP-1. 1 week later Patient: I’m nauseous and vomiting. Doctor: Take Zofran. 1 week later Patient: I’m constipated. Doctor: Take Metamucil. 1 month later Patient: I’m losing strength and muscle. Doctor: Let’s start testosterone. 1 month later Patient: My labs show high RBC and hemoglobin. Doctor: Donate blood. 1 season later Patient: Now I’m anemic. Doctor: Let’s do iron infusions. 1 season later Patient: I feel depressed from all of this. Doctor: Start an SSRI. 1 season later Patient: No sex drive. Erectile dysfunction. Brain fog. Doctor: Add Cialis. And let’s try an experimental Alzheimer’s drug. — No one asked: • Why did we suppress appetite pharmacologically? • Why did lean mass drop? • Why did erythrocytosis occur? • Why did anemia follow? • Why is mood collapsing? One injection becomes: Antiemetic → Laxative → Hormone → Phlebotomy → Iron → SSRI → PDE5 inhibitor → Cognitive drug. Side effect → Prescription → Side effect → Prescription. Polypharmacy as protocol. My advice: find real doctors, be wary of polypharmacy

@Assbear100 @DoctorTro Until the get cancer, heart disease, severe lethargy, or gain the fat back once they run out of money...

@DoctorTro I'm not aware of any doctor that just puts patients on as many drugs as possible. GLP-1s seems to have really good data behind them, and all of the people I know that have taken them have massively benefited from it

@health__freedom @DoctorTro Now I would listen to you before a doctor. Your ideas are critically thought out, a doctor just tells people to do what he learned in biased school.

You can avoid the doctors and prescription meds by taking back your health. Start by eating real foods. Skip the sugar, seed oils, and ultra processed junk that mess with your appetite, energy, and hormones in the first place. Simple meals with real meat, eggs, vegetables, and fruit can help your body stay balanced naturally without the cycle of one drug after another. What's one real food swap you can make to feel better and get off the prescription rollercoaster? Drop it below.

@DoctorTro My advice? Avoid doctors completely, do your own research, eat what our ancestors ate, spend time in the sun, and exercise.