Light

142 posts

Light banner
Light

Light

@BabylonVictim

☦︎ | video editor

🇺🇸 Beigetreten Mart 2021
256 Folgt60 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
Holy Ground ☦︎
English
1
6
16
846
captive dreamer
captive dreamer@captive_dreamer·
@vrilliumlive You don't piss anybody off, you're not a threat to anything, thats why you're allowed to have a YouTube channel and an Instagram account.
English
4
5
672
11.3K
Not the Don
Not the Don@Thedon9994·
@darwintojesus Your whole rant collapses into “God can’t create perfection, so imperfection is…good?” That’s not a defense, it’s redefining failure as a feature. >>>
English
9
0
8
617
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.
English
165
47
579
54.8K
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
edit by me btw
English
0
0
1
169
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
Holy Ground ☦︎
English
1
6
16
846
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
@Kiefer_Wool Very cool, how long did this take?
English
1
0
0
57
🌲Wool Wearer ☦️
🌲Wool Wearer ☦️@Kiefer_Wool·
This is how I decorated my liturgical epistle book. I like to make the books in my liturgical library just a bit more special
🌲Wool Wearer ☦️ tweet media🌲Wool Wearer ☦️ tweet media🌲Wool Wearer ☦️ tweet media
English
6
5
187
4K
The Tallahassee Patriots
The Tallahassee Patriots@PatriotsTLH·
I renounce support of @realDonaldTrump. Into the garbage this goes! Pray for Trump to thoroughly repent and visit an Orthodox Christian parish in which he finds the fullness of Christian faith. Same for @JDVance, who’s given no meaningful indication he’s on a different page.
The Tallahassee Patriots tweet media
English
32
10
262
5K
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
@ChromeBarracuda Shut up libtard, you just don’t have the iq to understand 9D chess.
English
0
0
7
112
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
@autoxrator This isn’t AI, but it still looks pretty terrible.
English
0
0
2
163
βasile▐┛
βasile▐┛@TeutonFire·
Trad Catty effeminates seething because a European woman rejects the pro-migrant Pope Leo in favour of an actual principled traditionalist sect of Christianity that doesn't have a deranged social-liberal as their head, condemning the milquetoast deportations of Trump. Saying Muslim and Christians in Europe need to co-exist alongside advocating for more migrants to be accepted. Not to mention his predecessor Francis who gets on his knees and kisses the dirty feet of migrants who are pillaging his civilization. Tell me more about race traitors. You should be terrified to even dare bring up the topic given what a shitshow of modernism and racial self flagellation your church is. The only good thing he has said recently is the condemnation of the US attack on Iran but it was just a general limp-wristed condemnation of war which in substance was just preaching the heresy of pacifism stating that all war is bad which is not the Christian position and would mean that he would have to condemn the crusades. And the cherry on top is that your own based trad Pope doesn't share your anti-Orthodox sentiment at all and is a radical ecumenist who views Orthodoxy as having Apostolic succession, and wants to establish communion with the Ecumenical Patriarch. Maybe you should take a leaf out of his book instead of larping that you still live in the Middle Ages when Papists actually had a backbone and weren't ecumenists and liberals. I still like individual Catholics who are good people and are fighting for the rights of European people and are Nationalists who conduct themselves respectfully but I am honestly just sick of the larp it's so cringe from some of these trads. You get it too from some Orthodox converts who just constantly want to bash normal Catholics who are simply celebrating Easter and don't do debates or apologetics which doesn't help us either. I appreciate Catholics who have called this out to and I hold no animosity towards them whilst still have strong criticism of the Papacy.
βasile▐┛ tweet media
English
8
6
72
2.2K
Joel Webbon
Joel Webbon@JoelWebbon·
I genuinely believe Trump is currently demon possessed.
English
3.2K
2.1K
23.1K
2.1M
NewsWire
NewsWire@NewsWire_US·
Republicans Could Lose Control of Texas for First Time in 30 Years — Newsweek
NewsWire tweet mediaNewsWire tweet media
English
554
1.5K
20.6K
3.2M
Light
Light@BabylonVictim·
@philobrossuckdi @philosophymeme0 What part of “all worldviews” did you not understand? Science depends on many presuppositions it cannot justify on its own, and naturalism ultimately rests on them even more.
English
1
0
1
97
Philbro Ass
Philbro Ass@philobrossuckdi·
@FallenLight0 @philosophymeme0 And you think that’s philosophy instead of just presuppositional faith? Also I struggle to see how scientific naturalism is faith based. Faith in what?
English
1
0
0
58