βasile▐┛

@OcultShinobi They waged a war of annihilation against the West, the high culture of Europe bound by a historical imperative with its racial and cultural consensus and historical grounding ceased to exist. Now and then there's no discontinuity, just one stage of capitalism to the next.

@dutchcaesar We should study, Marxist Leninists, Maoists, National Socialists, Syndicalists, Jacobins, Fascists, The IRGC and many others.

@TeutonFire I like Evola a lot. And I like him more than Nietzsche as well, but his work is mostly all theory when it comes to politics. It's all philosophy and metaphysics. Which is all great and fun, but it's useless when it comes to the praxis. You need a genuine methodology.

Reading Evola is basically useless same with Nietzsche, Lenin is much better. His book 'What Is To Be Done?' is a must read. Alongside Mao's essay 'On contradictions'. If you want to study politics you should study successful revolutionaries.

"Thus, the impious Jews killed their Benefactor and repaid Him for His good deeds with evil... the Jews hanged the One who hung the whole earth; they nailed to the Cross the One who established the universe; they condemned the One who measured the heavens..." - St. Epiphanius

@Linuxkrieg1871 The main issue is capitalism and liberalism, religion is another factor but not the main one.

@TeutonFire Gay humanism would still exist in a society no matter how christian it is because it suits the interests of the ruling class. Birthrates drop (mostly caused by incredible living conditions not atheism btw), so the ruling class shifts EVERYTHING to allow millions of new workers

Hitler vindicated on volkisch larpers who do nothing but sew division and essentially act like bolsheviks. These people are celebrating that White people were propagandized by atheist Jews like Sam Harris into being open borders humanist liberals who hate the foundation of their own culture and civilization. The decline of Christianity heavily correlated with the flourishing of social-liberalism which also heavily plagues organized paganism.

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐂 𝐒𝐒 𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐒 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐈𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐃 𝐀 𝐁𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐅 𝐈𝐍 𝐂𝐇𝐑𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐘 & 𝐆𝐎𝐃 When it comes to the Schutzstaffel, among those for our worldview and against our worldview there are always major conflations and presumptions inflicted on the historical purview. Undoubtedly, the Schutzstaffel's position on the Christian religion and the Christian worldview is complex and contextual. It cannot be purely summarized with a few documents or one SS manuscript. A while back, one tactic amongst the Atheists when it came to 𝙍𝙚𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙨𝙛𝙪𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙎 𝙃𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙃𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙡𝙚𝙧 and his religious beliefs was presenting the 1935 publication 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙎𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝘼𝙝𝙣𝙚𝙣 (𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙑𝙤𝙞𝙘𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝘼𝙣𝙘𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙧𝙨) as if it was anonymously written by Himmler under the pseudonym 𝙒𝙤𝙡𝙛 𝙎𝙤𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙣. Later research concluded that the person in question who wrote the anti-Christian polemic 𝙒𝘼𝙎 𝙉𝙊𝙏 Himmler but it was 𝙁𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙟𝙤𝙛 𝙁𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙧, a Völkisch writer of the 𝙂𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙁𝙖𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙈𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 and 𝘽ü𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚 𝙅𝙪𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙗𝙚𝙬𝙚𝙜𝙪𝙣𝙜. Both organizations were placed under the surveillance of the SS beginning in early 1935. Due to this measure by the SS the German Faith Movement had reduced their public activities and barely published any materials. In 1936, Hitler through the channels of the Reich Chancellery ordered distance from the German Faith Movement and refused to meet with the leader 𝙅𝙖𝙠𝙤𝙗 𝙒𝙞𝙡𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙢 𝙃𝙖𝙪𝙚𝙧 on several occasions: BArch R 43-II/180 invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direkt… BArch R 43-II/181a invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direkt… Frithjof Fischer [Listed as Author of Voice of our Ancestors] de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frithjof_… Himmler was not the author of 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙎𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝘼𝙝𝙣𝙚𝙣 and yet several National Socialist websites and bookstores selling the material still list him as the author anyway. Recently, when this was exposed by NS Christians, so called "neo-pagans" gradually distanced themselves from this claim but never issued an official retraction [they never do]. Their next tactic is to use a few select publications written by the 𝙍𝙚𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙨𝙛𝙪𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙎 where Christianity is heavily scrutinized and present this as anti-Christian also, the context of this absent and it's based on a HUGE conflation, that being: "criticism of Christianity and Christian dogma" does not mean "rejection of Christ and Christian original teachings" One SS publication in particular, that being 𝙍𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠, published by the 𝙎𝙎-𝙃𝙖𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙖𝙢𝙩 [𝙎𝙎 𝙈𝙖𝙞𝙣 𝙊𝙛𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙚] in 1943 which contains the following quotations that neo-pagans love to recite: --- 𝙍𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙆𝙞𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙣 [ 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙨 ] pg 4, 5, 6 ❝ 𝑭𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒂𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒔𝒑𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑰𝒕 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑱𝒆𝒘 𝑷𝒂𝒖𝒍 𝒘𝒉𝒐, 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒑𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝑱𝒆𝒘𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒚, 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒎𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝑬𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒓𝒆. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝑬𝒎𝒑𝒊𝒓𝒆 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒅 𝒘𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒊𝒙𝒊𝒏𝒈; 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒔𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒓𝒂𝒑𝒊𝒅𝒍𝒚. 𝑨𝒏𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒂 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏, 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝑹𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒏, 𝑮𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒌, 𝑱𝒆𝒘, 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌, 𝒆𝒕𝒄. 𝑨𝒔 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔, 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍, 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒎𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒇 𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒎𝒂. 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆: 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒏-𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒊𝒕𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇, 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒚. 𝑺𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝑮𝒐𝒅'𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉; 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒐𝒂𝒍 𝒊𝒔 𝒂 𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒅 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉, 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉 𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒍𝒚 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆. 𝑷𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝑷𝒊𝒖𝒔 𝑰𝑿 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒎𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒄𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒏 𝑱𝒖𝒍𝒚 29, 1938: “𝑻𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒚, 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆, 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕, 𝒂𝒍𝒍-𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑪𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒆.” 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒅𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒂 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒑𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆; 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑶𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒃𝒆𝒅 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂 𝒘𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒗𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒕𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒓𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒖𝒑𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒗𝒂𝒍, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎 𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝑩𝒚𝒛𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑻𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒅𝒖𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒓 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒚𝒍𝒆. 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒖𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒆; 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒔, 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒅𝒆, 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒏, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒑 𝒕𝒐 𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, 𝒕𝒐 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒂 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒚𝒍𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍. 𝑰𝒏 1000 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒔, 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝑨𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝒎𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆. 𝑶𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒓𝒚, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕, 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒆𝒙𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆, 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒅𝒊𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒏 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆. 𝑰𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒔 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝑨𝒓𝒚𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑱𝒆𝒘𝒔, 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔. 𝑰𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝑮𝒐𝒅-𝒈𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒅. 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒕𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒖𝒔 𝒃𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒂 𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒐𝒇 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔, 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒔. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒉𝒚 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒕, 𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒄 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔, 𝒉𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒇 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒈𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕 𝒂 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆, 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒔-𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒆𝒓. 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒊𝒄 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒏 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒎𝒂 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔. 𝑴𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑬𝒄𝒌𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝒔𝒂𝒊𝒅 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒏 𝒔𝒊𝒙 𝒉𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒈𝒐: "𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏 𝒎𝒆; 𝑰 𝒂𝒎 𝒂 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒕; 𝑰 𝒂𝒎 𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒆 𝑮𝒐𝒅'𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒔𝒕." 𝑨𝒏𝒅 𝑳𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒔 𝒐𝒏 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝒗𝒐𝒊𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆; 𝒃𝒖𝒕 (𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒏 𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒅𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒐𝒐𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉 𝒃𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒏 𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒄 𝒂𝒘𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒆𝒕𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒑𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒑𝒖𝒕𝒆) 𝑳𝒖𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒓𝒆-𝒃𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑱𝒆𝒘𝒊𝒔𝒉 𝒕𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑩𝒊𝒃𝒍𝒆. 𝑾𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒖𝒔, 𝑲𝒆𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒓, 𝑮𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒆𝒐, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒄𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒔, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒈𝒈𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒎𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒏 𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒕 𝒄𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒎𝒂 𝒃𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒔. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒊𝒄 𝒔𝒑𝒊𝒓𝒊𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒊𝒏𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒓𝒚 𝒔𝒆𝒆𝒌𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒆 𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉 𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑨𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒚 𝒊𝒕 𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒂𝒄𝒌𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒆𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒚 𝒊𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒅. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘, 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒉 𝒊𝒔 𝒃𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘𝒍𝒆𝒅𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒘𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒄𝒆𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒎𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒂-𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒕𝒐 𝒂 𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒅 ❞ --- This is pretty anti-Christian right? Eh, no. This entire passage NEVER once criticizes any statements or teaching from Jesus Christ himself and clearly states that the 𝙀𝙌𝘼𝙐𝘼𝙇𝙄𝙏𝙔 within Christian institutions like the Catholic Church are a "heresy" to the German Volk. Not that Jesus himself or his original teachings were a "heresy" to the German Volk. This is a huge difference and the full passage exemplifies what Himmler and the SS were criticizing. This criticism is more directed at a Christian institution than it is the Christian religion. The definition of heresy means: "adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma" or "an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards" Himmler is stating that "equality" that is promoted within the Churches is heresy to the National Socialist worldview and its CHRISTIAN worldview. The notion of equality in the church was stated by Himmler to have been founded in the orient of which it originated from several cultures. Himmler is intentionally pluralistic in this description about the origins of racial equality and does not specifically blame it on Christianity in an isolated instance and asserts it found its final form within the DISTORTED teachings of Christ through byzantine influence. He is blaming this egalitarian influence on Paul, not Jesus, not Christianity as a whole and not God. You will find below that Himmler still avows a UNIVERSAL monotheistic creator God that is responsible for establishing the Laws of Nature and the creation of all races. Never ever in Himmler's Rassenpolitik does he instruct the SS to abandon Point 24 of the Programme. He does not criticize Jesus Christ directly nor denies him as the messiah of Germans and that said universal creator God. Rassenpolitik is critical of the church doctrine of equality on a political, ideological and spiritual level and it is a constructive criticism of which its intent is to establish a TRUE Christian doctrine through the German perspective rather than the Catholic Church or Mediterranean Christianity. That is the context in which neo pagans leave out, don't understand or omit. Several publications from the same 𝙎𝙎-𝙃𝙖𝙪𝙥𝙩𝙖𝙢𝙩 substantiate this and must also be equally taken into account: --- ⚪️ 𝙃𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙗ü𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙛ü𝙧 𝙙𝙞𝙚 𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙡𝙪𝙣𝙜 𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙏𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙣 (1943) x.com/spacecatpressV… It is plainly stated here in this SS Pamphlet Handbook For The Ideological Handbook for the Troops that the SS is not fighting the Church as a "Christian entity". This was published the exact same year as the 𝙍𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙠 ⚪️𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙒𝙖𝙝𝙧𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙩 ü𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙞𝙚 𝙒𝙖𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙣-𝙎𝙎 (1944) x.com/spacecatpressV… It is stated here in this memorandum published by the Wehrmacht after a preliminary investigation into both the Waffen-SS and the SS that no evidence was found that the SS was anti-Christian. This memo refutes the accusations that the SS forced their conscripts to leave the church, participated in Pagan festivals, and that the Schutzstaffel's concept of 𝙂𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙜𝙡ä𝙪𝙗𝙞𝙜 was a "disguise" for Paganism, Atheism and Materialism. ⚪️ 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙤ß𝙚 𝙇ü𝙜𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙆𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙯𝙞𝙨𝙢𝙪𝙨 (1938) x.com/spacecatpressV… This book was written by Reichsleiter and SS-Oberst-Gruppenführer 𝙁𝙧𝙖𝙣𝙨 𝙓𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙘𝙝𝙬𝙖𝙧𝙯 in 1938 and it extensively outlines the NSDAP and the SS's position on Political Catholicism, debunks that the NSDAP was persecuting Christians and Churches and shows photographs where churches were constructed during National Socialist Germany's reign. This was written by an SS member who had one of the most supreme positions of the entire protection squadron. He was also the Reich Financial Minister of NSG x.com/spacecatpressV… These publications produced by the SS are supplemented with the documents that show us: 🔴 Heinrich Himmler did not believe Jesus Christ was Jewish (June 16 & 28 1937 x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 The Schutzstaffel did not consider Christianity to be of Jewish origin (April 15 1937) x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 Heinrich Himmler and the SS banned Druid Paganism (December 11 1936) x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 Himmler ousted a member from the SS for besmirching Christianity (July 24 1937) x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 Himmler expelled a Das Schwarze Korps cartoonist for distributing anti-Christian cartoons within the SS (December 15 1937) x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 Reich Minister of Foreign Affairs Lutz Graf Von Schwerin von Krosigk described Himmler as a Christian (April 22 1945) x.com/spacecatpressV… 🔴 The Waffen-SS fifth division Wiking denied and refuted the lie Adolf Hitler was a "pagan" in response to Allied propaganda (1943) x.com/spacecatpressV… --- The previous excerpts of evidence that Heinrich Himmler and the SS were not anti-Christian nor were against the teachings of Jesus Christ will be supplemented from the following excerpts ordered in SS documents concerning the proposed publication of 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙏𝙪𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙎-𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙨 (𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙑𝙞𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙎 𝙈𝙖𝙣) in January 1945. Due to the fact that National Socialist Germany surrendered to Allied forces on May 9 1945, it is unclear whether or not this publication was finished by the SS and distributed across the Party of the German Reich. Inquiries about this publication on the internet direct to a different but similar book also published by the SS in 1939 called 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙂𝙧𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙩𝙯𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙎: 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙏𝙪𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙎-𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙨 (𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙁𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙖𝙬𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙎: 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙑𝙞𝙧𝙩𝙪𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙎 𝙈𝙖𝙣.) These two books are not the same publication but more or less execute the same idea and point. --- The following document is from February 28 1945 concerning a change of language in the publication: 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙏𝙪𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙎-𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙨 which was ordered by 𝙍𝙚𝙞𝙘𝙝𝙨𝙛𝙪𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙎 𝙃𝙚𝙞𝙣𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙃𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙡𝙚𝙧 to 𝙎𝙎-𝙊𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙧𝙪𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙛ü𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙧 𝙂𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙤𝙗 𝘽𝙚𝙧𝙜𝙚𝙧. The letter was sent on January 4 1945: ❝ 𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝑶𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒈𝒓𝒖𝒑𝒑𝒆𝒏𝒇ü𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒓! 𝑰 𝒂𝒎 𝒓𝒆𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒇𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒉𝒖𝒓𝒆 "𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑽𝒊𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝑺 𝑴𝒂𝒏." 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒔𝒇ü𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒓-𝑺𝑺 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒔: 1.) 𝑩𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒇 𝒊𝒏 𝑮𝒐𝒅: 𝒂) 𝑰𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒑𝒉, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒔 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒅. 𝑰𝒕 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅: "𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒐𝒓𝒅 𝑮𝒐𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒖𝒔..." 𝒃) 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒕 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅: "𝒀𝒐𝒖 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘, 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒅 𝒖𝒑𝒐𝒏 𝒉𝒊𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒊𝒇𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒐 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒌𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔." ❞ --- The final documents are from June 1 1943 concering further draft updates regarding the Basic Laws of the SS which as stated earlier was published in 1939 in the book 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙂𝙧𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙩𝙯𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙧 𝙎𝙎: 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙏𝙪𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙎𝙎-𝙈𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙨: 𝙂𝙡𝙖𝙪𝙗𝙚 𝙖𝙣 𝙂𝙤𝙩𝙩: ❝ (𝑬𝒙𝒄𝒆𝒓𝒑𝒕 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑹𝒆𝒊𝒄𝒉𝒔𝒇ü𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒓-𝑺𝑺'𝒔 𝒕𝒆𝒙𝒕: "𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝑺 𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒏 𝑨𝒏𝒕𝒊-𝑩𝒐𝒍𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝑪𝒐𝒎𝒃𝒂𝒕 𝑶𝒓𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏," 𝒑𝒑. 26–28) 𝑰𝒏 𝒂 𝒔𝒎𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒐𝒐𝒌𝒍𝒆𝒕 𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒅 "50 𝑸𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑨𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑺𝑺 𝑴𝒂𝒏," 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒔: "𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒊𝒔 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒐𝒂𝒕𝒉?" 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔: "𝑾𝒆 𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖, 𝑨𝒅𝒐𝒍𝒇 𝑯𝒊𝒕𝒍𝒆𝒓, 𝒂𝒔 𝑭ü𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑪𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑮𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝑹𝒆𝒊𝒄𝒉, 𝒍𝒐𝒚𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒃𝒓𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚. 𝑾𝒆 𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒅𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒃𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒚𝒐𝒖. 𝑺𝒐 𝒉𝒆𝒍𝒑 𝒖𝒔 𝑮𝒐𝒅!" 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒅 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒔: "𝑺𝒐, 𝒅𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝑮𝒐𝒅?" 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔: "𝒀𝒆𝒔, 𝑰 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝑮𝒐𝒅." 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒓𝒅 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒊𝒔: "𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒅𝒐 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒌 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒐𝒏 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒆𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒈𝒐𝒅?" 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔: "𝑰 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒊𝒎 𝒂𝒓𝒓𝒐𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒕, 𝒎𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍𝒐𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒂𝒄𝒂𝒍, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒑𝒊𝒅; 𝒉𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒔𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒖𝒔." 𝑰 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒐 𝒄𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒚 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒏 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒏. 𝑹𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅, 𝒘𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒃𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒏 𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒑𝒔 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒘𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒇𝒂𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝑳𝒐𝒓𝒅 𝑮𝒐𝒅 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒖𝒔—𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒖𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑭𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅, 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒉, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒖𝒔 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑭ü𝒉𝒓𝒆𝒓. 𝑾𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒎𝒍𝒚 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕, 𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒄𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒍𝒂𝒘𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅, 𝒘𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒔𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒅𝒆𝒆𝒅, 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕; 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒔, 𝒔𝒑𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒕𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒖𝒆𝒔, 𝒐𝒓 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒆𝒅 𝒃𝒚 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒄𝒕 𝒊𝒕𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇, 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒆𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒄𝒕—𝒇𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌 𝒖𝒑𝒐𝒏 𝒖𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆, 𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒏 𝒖𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒂𝒑𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒚𝒄𝒍𝒆, 𝒂𝒔 𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒂 𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒓 𝒂 𝒄𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒆. 𝑩𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒎𝒆, 𝒎𝒆𝒏 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔. 𝒀𝒆𝒕, 𝒔𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒆—𝒂𝒔 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚—𝒅𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒊𝒕 𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄 𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒐𝒈𝒎𝒂, 𝒏𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒎𝒆𝒏, 𝒘𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒃𝒆 𝒃𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅 "𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒏." 𝑾𝒆 𝒅𝒐, 𝒉𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓, 𝒄𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒎 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒓𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒇𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒐𝒎 𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒓𝒂𝒘 𝒂 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒑, 𝒄𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒓 𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒕𝒘𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒆𝒄𝒄𝒍𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍, 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒐𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒊𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈; 𝒘𝒆 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒓𝒆𝒑𝒆𝒍 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒓𝒐𝒂𝒄𝒉𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒖𝒑𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝒎𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒗𝒊𝒈𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒔𝒍𝒚. 𝑱𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒂𝒔 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒎𝒍𝒚, 𝒘𝒆 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒎𝒆𝒏—𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒎 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒂𝒔𝒕—𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒂𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒇𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒚𝒎𝒂𝒏 𝒃𝒚 𝒗𝒊𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒖𝒑𝒃𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒏𝒐 𝒐𝒇𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆 𝒊𝒔 𝒈𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅 𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒆𝒅 ❞ --- SOURCES: BArch NS 19/1350 (February 28 1945) invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direkt… BArch RS 3-10/1 invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direkt… Rassenpolitik (1943) archive.org/details/SSHaup… SS - Handblätter für die weltanschauliche Erziehung der Truppe (1943) archive.org/details/ss-han… 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙒𝙖𝙝𝙧𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙩 ü𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙙𝙞𝙚 𝙒𝙖𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙣-𝙎𝙎 (1944) BArch NS 31/142 invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direkt… 𝘿𝙞𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙤ß𝙚 𝙇ü𝙜𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙨 𝙥𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙆𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙯𝙞𝙨𝙢𝙪𝙨 (1938) archive.org/details/schwar… Die Grundgesetze der SS. Die Tugenden des SS-Mannes dutchmilitaria.com/product/brochu… deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/3CY3Q7SLW…

@T_Schizofrenis I am being hyperbolic somewhat, I think there is value in Evola my pinned tweet is a quote from him.

@TeutonFire Evola's/Guenon's point regarding the judgment of the horizontal and vertical axes for persons is important for every Right-Wing movement. His sections on such is important imo.

Hitler opposed the pretentious faggots like Landshark of his time who read a million useless books as a form of social signalling yet still end up as philosemitic classical liberals. It's funny that Gabriel made a similar post and every single gutter dweller came out and counter-signaled him for it. These people don't actually even read anymore.

@respectable005 @HayastanPapist @LewisLosesIt It's funny that he is unironically calling Albanians non-White just because they have a religious plurality of Muslims and Christians lmao. Once again right wingers don't actually believe in race they view it as a social identity.

@HayastanPapist @TeutonFire @LewisLosesIt

@TrveApvlian Never said it's bad.

@TeutonFire How is reading Evola bad tho

@b3ygghsas @doomernat22 It's always brownoids who do this pro-White larp and it's defending kikes.

@TeutonFire @doomernat22 Very observant of your part

1 down

@HayastanPapist @LewisLosesIt You don't get Whiter than being English. You cluster with Turks and Iranians genetically.

@TeutonFire @LewisLosesIt >England You’re one to talk 😂

@HayastanPapist @LewisLosesIt You are third world.

@TeutonFire @LewisLosesIt Bombing Third Worlders is based, actually?

@b3ygghsas @doomernat22 You're from Brazil.

@doomernat22 Same energy

This White guy from Europe is brown actually not this Hispanic who voted for trump. Race is a social identity now where it's based on your geopolitical stances. If you support the enemies of the Anti-White Imperial superstructure then you're brown. You should cheer for 50% White America bombing random countries for Jewish capitalists like they did to Europe and be an "ironic" Zionist.

@TeutonFire “Dooood that’s like heckin non-Faustian dooood, I’d much rather post really gay photos of men from the 60s smoking or something and say ‘when we win’ even though we never will”

@TeutonFire man who suggested this??

Rightoids aren't motivated by the actual utility of ideas it's all about vibes and basically virtue signalling how based you are to other retards. Ironically the same people who claim to be Hitler admirers are falling into exactly the same issues that made him hate the conservatives of his time. It is literally more socially acceptable to be a full blown Zionist than to study Lenin.

@TeutonFire People won’t understand that you can adopt or learn from Lenin without actually being a Marxist. The value is found in the methodology or form not necessarily the particular substance of Bolshevism