Noneyas
4.8K posts

Noneyas
@BlueSkyForDays
Father, husband, proud American, gun owner, amateur martial arts enthusiast. **You get what you earn, not what you deserve.**


Gas prices have risen dramatically in Pueblo, Colorado, and its surrounding area. “I can either choose gas or food, but I coach kids’ sports, and I need gas to get there, so I guess I’m not eating,” said one resident. wapo.st/4bXjNvc

























This chart demolishes one of the central claims of the climate cult. It comes from Munich Re, one of the world’s largest reinsurance companies. Their entire business depends on accurately pricing risk. What does it show? Weather disaster losses as a percentage of global GDP from 1990–2025. Not raw dollars. Not media headlines. Losses normalized to the size of the global economy. And the trend? Flat… if anything slightly declining. If climate change were causing an explosion in extreme weather damages, losses should be rising faster than global wealth. They aren’t. What we see instead are occasional spikes (1993, 2005, 2017) surrounded by long periods of normal variability. Weather fluctuates. The long-term trend does not show escalating catastrophe. So why does the public constantly hear about “record climate disasters”? Because the climate industrial complex almost always cites raw dollar losses. As the global economy grows and more infrastructure exists, of course the total cost of disasters rises. That’s not climate. That’s propaganda. Normalize the data properly, and the panic narrative falls apart. The truth is simple: despite rising CO₂ and endless climate alarmism, weather disasters are not consuming a larger share of global wealth. The climate cult needs people to believe the world is spiraling into chaos. The data keep saying otherwise.













