AmbrosiaCreamChapel

@Banksycat @darrengrimes @Richcanvas This is nonsense.

He's got 200,000 members and he's polling ahead of Labour. All without anyone noticing he's actually quite thin on policy, quite flexible on principle, and quite ruthless about dissent. Zack Polanski leads a party whose MPs backed abortion decriminalisation up to birth. June 2025. Labour pushed an amendment through with 46 minutes of Commons debate. For any reason. Including sex selection. No gestational limit. The Lords tried to kill it this week. Failed. 185 to 148 and one percent of Britain supports it. Polanski ran on antisemitism standards. Argued for IHRA definition. Then as he campaigned for leadership, he downplayed Corbyn-era antisemitism to appeal to left wing voters. Position shifted. He ran on economic policy. Got on national media. Couldn't explain debt versus deficits. Stumbled. Never landed the point. So how does someone with that thin a grasp of policy and that flexible a relationship with principle end up leading a party? By consolidating power ruthlessly. Under Polanski, the Greens expelled women members for gender critical views. Turned away the women's rights group at conference. A former councillor said the party is now dominated by luxury beliefs and pays little attention to working classes. An anonymous senior member called it a hostile takeover. He won because he's charismatic on camera, not because he knows what he's talking about or because he's principled. That's institutional capture. You don't watch it happen in Parliament. You watch it happen inside a party as someone consolidates control by silencing dissent, shifting positions to consolidate support, and surrounding themselves with loyalists. The abortion policy vote? Symptom. The takeover of the party itself? Disease. The clip's a distraction. The real story is darker.

Zack Polanski gets asked a simple question on why his party chose to support decriminalising abortion until birth, a grim policy. Polanski’s response? “p*ss off”. He can’t even defend his own party policy.

@darrengrimes Correct response. When dimwits with microphones can't even be bothered to fact check, "Piss off" is entirely appropriate.

@LightFrameShoot @_johnbye Yes, but it's still baffling!

@DefectingGrey @_johnbye It’s in English Literature, not in a branch of science. Could explain a lot.

Naomi Wolf can't understand why banning "chemtrails" in some states hasn't changed anything. 🤔 Now she thinks "our enemies" might be spraying them. 🙄

@Cornholio2025 @ChildrensHD Haha!

@DefectingGrey @ChildrensHD The funny thing is I didn’t ignore it at all. You ignore basic scientific fundamentals. An objective thinker can see where they have a point. A dogmatic individual who openly disregards or mocks points of view without fully listening to the details and vetting them is the issue.

Dr. Larry Palevsky: “Vaccines are MADE to cause inflammation.” “Every child vaccinated is injured because inflammation has to happen.” “By definition, we cause inflammation when we give vaccines.” “How long does that inflammation go on?” “We have no data.” “Where does that inflammation go in the body?” “We have no data.” “When you look at the studies… there are no real understandings of what happens.” “We have so many kids with chronic inflammation.” “We are administering a medical procedure that causes inflammation without data to understand how long it lasts and where it goes in the body.” “We owe it to our children to find these answers before we keep causing inflammation.” @MAHA_Institute

@Cornholio2025 @ChildrensHD LOL

@DefectingGrey @ChildrensHD In order to push for immunity and trigger the response, it means you have to injure or attempt to do so. If there is no injury or threat thereof, what reason does the body need to respond?

Once again, Emma nails it. Probably the best ever thread on the annual Easter egg insanity.

@Cornholio2025 @ChildrensHD It's as though you ignored my reply and made up in your head that I said something else. Inflammation from a vaccine,which is local to the injection site, is not an "injury",any more than the needle hole is an "injury". It's a planned and controlled part of how the vaccine works.

@DefectingGrey @ChildrensHD Vaccination as we are told is injecting something to trigger an inflammatory response for immunity does it not?

@MikeLowrey911 @MensHumor Bad night's sleep?

@MensHumor Aaron Chapman must not be in San Francisco posting this. Payback of being shot is likely high if it was done in SF. Then the DA will drop all charges against the perp or even put them on probation for the 36th time. Must be a different Orpheum theater.

This is the petty I can get behind.

@LGBwiththeT @Heccles94 Hehe...

@Heccles94 Just to wind them all up

Imagine getting annoyed that Easter eggs don’t say Easter on them, when in fact they say Easter on them. It’s really not normal.

@Heccles94 I've not bought a Christmas tree for 20 years ever since they stopped saying "Christmas" on them.

@Blayney20 @Elwick70 Haha!

@Elwick70 I’ve just been in Sainsbury’s and not all the Cadbury Easter eggs have the word Easter written on the top or anywhere else, there are different packaging types and you have chosen to show one version which does have the word Easter on the top. sainsburys.co.uk/gol-ui/product…

These are the very eggs that Ben is posting about. Look at his complaint, then look at the box again. If you’re one of the people that often falls for the kind of mendacious tripe that the likes of “Ben” post, then I think it’s time you reevaluated your life choices.

@chrisTstraker @SamanthaTaghoy @AnnieCshandbag Except...

@SamanthaTaghoy @AnnieCshandbag Won't be buying any eggs that don't say Easter on them 🤔🙄

Dear Cadbury, “From Cadbury this season.” What season? Go on, say it. It’s EASTER. You are selling EASTER eggs for the EASTER SEASON. How dare you profit off a Christian holiday while erasing its Christian origins. They are Easter eggs. It is Easter. Shame on you.

@kathrynmcnamar4 @MorganPCALLB @naomirwolf @TonysChocoUK_IE LOL

@MorganPCALLB @naomirwolf @TonysChocoUK_IE They don’t have palm oil, that’s true. But their packaging does not say Easter eggs. It says chocolate eggs.

Just for reference, Tony’s is still labeling their eggs as Easter eggs, and these eggs contain no palm oil whatsoever. Enjoy this Easter! @TonysChocoUK_IE

@NCockin48810 @SamanthaTaghoy @ejames500 Please see a specialist if your eyes don't work.

@SamanthaTaghoy @ejames500 I refuse to buy any Easter Eggs unless they mention Easter on their packaging!

@Cornholio2025 @ChildrensHD I'm not laughing at the mechanism of inflammation. I'm laughing at this nonsense: “Every child vaccinated is injured because inflammation has to happen.”

@DefectingGrey @ChildrensHD You do realize infection is one way your body’s inflammatory response gets initiated. That along with things like toxins and others also cause the same problem. And you consider that basic premise quackery?

@DrKatLindley LOL

They make us fear the nature, but the problem are the scientists playing the gain of function games in their labs

@WhyCensorMe @drtomcowan Nope. You're just boring. Meme jousting is dull, especially when you have no argument or sense. Be muted.

@DefectingGrey @drtomcowan Huh, so quick to close the mind with excuses. How very scientific of you.

Today, in 2026, it is still the only way to prove that a virus exists. #drtomcowan #virologists #virus #disease

@WhyCensorMe @drtomcowan No. Unless you have a point, rather than pretty pictures, you're rapidly gonna lose my "attention".

@DefectingGrey @drtomcowan Attention!