AmbrosiaCreamChapel

30.6K posts

AmbrosiaCreamChapel banner
AmbrosiaCreamChapel

AmbrosiaCreamChapel

@DefectingGrey

Music, art, photography, books, architecture, film, history, science, logic, reason, socialism, housing, bullshit detection - often all at the same time

London, England Katılım Haziran 2014
1.7K Takip Edilen592 Takipçiler
John M. Cameron
John M. Cameron@johnrockshomes·
I am a J6er. I protested a stolen election. Walked right past the police through an open door, and the police let me in. My father's step son turned me into the FBI. My house was raided. They branded me a traitor, and insurrectionist, slapped me on a terrorist watchlist. I plead guilty to illegal picketing, a Class B petty offense misdemeanor with the same sentencing guidelines as walking your dog off leash on a National Park . They swore no prison time. They lied. Judge Hogan sentenced me to 30 days for “not being remorseful enough” and three years’ probation to tie me up through elections. An unconstitutional "split" sentence. My Judge, Judge Hogan called J6 worse than the war of 1812. All I did was chant "Stop the Steal!" inside the Capitol and wear the wrong Tshirt. God Bless the J6ers!
English
5.4K
9.2K
39K
959K
Tom London
Tom London@TomLondon6·
I'm Jewish, British & 64 All my life, I wondered how the Holocaust could have happened. I understood that Hitler & other leaders were EVIL, but how did millions of ordinary people go along with it? NOW, seeing how so many in the West rationalise & defend the Gaza Genocide, I think I have my answer and it is profoundly disturbing
English
2.1K
9.8K
34.9K
1.4M
Allen M
Allen M@AJMcL63·
@DrNeilStone He's 100 times better than you or Fraudci, Your ignorance is dangerous to all. STHup.
English
1
0
0
21
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
This is not the guy I would want in charge of protecting us from Ebola
Neil Stone tweet media
English
201
359
2.2K
14.8K
AmbrosiaCreamChapel
AmbrosiaCreamChapel@DefectingGrey·
@KateShemirani You ARE crazy. Dangerous and deluded too. Have you made your mind up yet whether viruses exist or not? Kinda important to have a consistent viewpoint, surely?
AmbrosiaCreamChapel tweet media
English
0
0
0
37
Kate Shemirani
Kate Shemirani@KateShemirani·
When I covered this in 2020, people called me crazy. When I said at the rally on August 29, 2020 that they would be coming with a vaccine and you would not be able to travel without it …people called me crazy and when I stated that Vaccine had the ability to change DNA… People called me crazy At that time I had read a lot of documents. So far, everything has come to fruition. Avatar one, avatar two, avatar three, and avatar for which is eternal life in the maniacs eyes Fusing man with machine and then becoming a hologram. Call me crazy but it commenced in 2015 and it’s on target
Valerie Anne Smith@ValerieAnne1970

BILL GATES’ MICRONEEDLE mRNA PATCH IS HERE Meet the new “vaccine” that doesn’t just jab you — it permanently tattoos your body with modified mRNA AND quantum-dot QR codes. One painless patch on your wrist (or wherever) dissolves, floods you with mRNA, and embeds scannable biotech markers that last years — possibly forever. No phone needed. No card. No paper passport. Just scan your skin at the store, airport, or restaurant and the system instantly knows your “vaccine status,” batch number, and compliance level. This is the biological control grid planned for the next plandemic — a permanent digital prison under your skin. They’re not hiding it anymore. Your body is the barcode. Wake up. Resist.

English
3
15
38
4K
AmbrosiaCreamChapel retweetledi
Peter Girnus 🦅
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz·
I am the Minister of National Security of the State of Israel. In 2007, I was convicted of incitement to racism and support for a terrorist organization. I tell you the second fact first because I want you to hold it in your mind for everything that follows. Last week I visited Ashdod port. Four hundred people were kneeling on the ground. Hands bound behind their backs. Foreheads to the concrete. They came from forty countries on fifty boats. Three hundred tons of cargo in the holds. Medicine. Baby formula. Surgical supplies. Bandages. Among the kneeling: a doctor from Ireland. The sister of a president. A retired ship captain. A parliamentarian's aide. Foreheads to my concrete. Wrists bound with my zip ties. Called terrorists by my loudspeaker. Every one of them carried medicine. Not one of them carried a weapon. I walked among them with a flag. My staff played the national anthem on loudspeakers. I told them: "Welcome to the State of Israel." I told the Prime Minister: "Give them to me for a long, long time. Give them to us for the terrorist prisons." I filmed this. I posted it to my social media accounts. Voluntarily. With a caption. I know what a terrorist looks like. At seventeen I joined a movement founded by Meir Kahane. The state of Israel banned that movement. Designated it a terrorist organization. In 1994, a man named Baruch Goldstein walked into the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron and opened fire during morning prayers. He killed twenty-nine people. Wounded one hundred and twenty-five. He was a member of our movement. I kept his portrait in my living room. Next to my family photographs. For years. Visitors would ask about it the way they ask about a vacation photograph. I had an answer ready. I always had an answer ready. I removed the portrait when I entered politics. Not because I changed my mind. I didn't change my mind. I removed it because the frame didn't match the office furniture. Because a photograph on a wall is a liability. The belief behind the photograph is not. The belief travels without frames. It doesn't need a wall. At nineteen I ripped a piece from a prime minister's car. The hood ornament from his Cadillac. I held it up to a television camera and I said: "We got to his car. We'll get to him too." Three weeks later, they got to him. Two bullets. A rally in Tel Aviv. The prime minister fell and the country changed and I was not charged because I was not the one who fired. I was the one who demonstrated that the car was reachable. That the man inside was reachable. Someone else demonstrated commitment. I demonstrated possibility. I tell you this so you understand the trajectory. Hood ornament at nineteen. Portrait on the wall at twenty-five. Conviction at thirty-one. Ministry at forty-six. Death penalty at forty-nine. Ashdod this week. Each step further from consequence. Each step closer to the thing that has no name because the man who names things is me. I was convicted at thirty-one. Incitement to racism. Support for a terrorist organization. Two convictions. Court record. Public file. Everyone could see it. Everyone did see it. Reporters wrote about it. Opposition politicians cited it. Human rights organizations referenced it in formal complaints. And then I became a cabinet minister. I want you to understand the distance. Convicted supporter of a designated terrorist organization. Minister of National Security. Eighteen years between those two facts. In those eighteen years, nobody stopped me. Not the courts. Not the political parties. Not the intelligence services. Not the coalition negotiations. Not the international community. Not the Americans. Nobody at any point between "convicted of supporting terrorism" and "in charge of national security for nine million people" said: no. That word. The one that costs $32 million in America now. Nobody said it. I know what a terrorist looks like. He looks like a nurse from Dublin carrying bandages in a cargo hold. He looks like a retired teacher from Norway with baby formula. He looks like four hundred people from forty countries who loaded medicine onto boats and sailed toward a population that needs it. He does not look like me. He has never looked like me. Not at seventeen when I joined the movement. Not at thirty-one when the court convicted me. Not at forty-six when the Prime Minister handed me the ministry. Not last week at Ashdod when I waved a flag over four hundred kneeling people and called them what I was convicted of supporting. Let me explain something about the word "terrorist." The word does not describe conduct. I learned this between thirty-one and forty-nine. The word describes a relationship to power. When I supported a designated terrorist organization, I was powerless. The state had the stamp. The state stamped me. When I became the state, I took the stamp. Now I stamp others. The word didn't change. The hand holding the stamp changed. That is the only lesson of my career. The only one worth teaching. Power is not subject to its own vocabulary. I stamp four hundred people carrying medicine and I call them terrorists and I am a convicted supporter of terrorism and nobody in this sentence sees a contradiction because there is no contradiction. There is only the stamp. Whoever holds it defines the word. I hold it. In March I pushed a law through the Knesset. The death penalty. For terrorism. In military courts that try Palestinians. Let me say that precisely. A man convicted of supporting a terrorist organization authored a law allowing the execution of people he designates as terrorists. The stamp is no longer a word. It is a sentence. A death sentence. I write it. I sign it. The word means whatever I need it to mean and now it means death and I decide when it means death and nobody in this sentence sees a contradiction because the contradiction requires someone willing to say the word "no." My conviction is not a disqualification. It is a credential. It proves I understand what the stamp does because I have been on both ends of it. I know what it weighs from below. Now I know what it weighs from above. That is expertise. That is why they gave me the ministry. Not despite the conviction. Because of it. Now let me tell you about the Americans. They had one congressman who asked questions about me. One. Thomas Massie. Republican. Kentucky. He voted against our aid package every year for thirteen years. Every year. He asked why $3.8 billion flows annually to a government whose Minister of National Security was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization. He introduced the AIPAC Act. Legislation that would have required the organizations protecting our funding to register as foreign agents. He lost his primary. Last week. The same week I visited Ashdod. $32 million. The most expensive House primary in American history. The organizations that protect our $3.8 billion per year spent $32 million to remove the one man who asked where the $3.8 billion goes. I find the math instructive. $32 million to protect $3.8 billion annually. Over the ten-year agreement, that is $38 billion. They spent 0.08% to protect the other 99.92%. That is not politics. That is an insurance premium. Let me tell you what the $3.8 billion buys. Two-thousand-pound bombs. MK-84s. Hellfire missiles. JDAM guidance kits. 155-millimeter artillery shells. F-35 fighter jets. The boats carried bandages. The appropriation carries bombs. Both travel toward the same population. One arrives. The medicine is in a warehouse. The bombs are not in a warehouse. The baby formula will expire on a shelf at Ashdod. The 155-millimeter shells will not expire on a shelf. They have a different delivery schedule. The delivery schedule is uninterrupted. The delivery schedule has never been interrupted. Because interruption requires someone in the United States Congress to say the word and the word costs $32 million and the last man who could afford it was not a billionaire from Manhattan. He was an engineer from Kentucky. And he is gone now. Let me tell you how the Americans do it. Because I admire the craftsmanship. The organization is called AIPAC. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee. They do not give money directly to candidates. That would be crude. They bundle. They route. They aggregate. Three billionaires from Manhattan, Las Vegas, and Park Avenue. Paul Singer. Miriam Adelson. John Paulson. Between them they have never cast a ballot in Kentucky's 4th congressional district. They cannot name the county seats. They do not need to. They have a platform called Democracy Engine that translates their preferences into Kentucky's. A contribution enters from a hedge fund manager on 57th Street. It exits as a line item on a campaign report in Covington. The money doesn't change. The origin story does. Massie's replacement raised $1.3 million on his own. Nine percent of the total spent on his behalf. Ninety-one percent came from people who have never been to Kentucky and whose primary policy interest is ensuring that my $3.8 billion arrives without conditions. Without hearings. Without anyone asking what the Minister of National Security does with it. I consider them investors. They invested $32 million in my impunity. The return is unconditional funding. No conditions means no questions. No questions means I can visit Ashdod with a flag and a loudspeaker and four hundred kneeling people and the body that writes the check will not look up from its desk. Now here is the part I find most instructive. The Americans have another word. Not "terrorist." A different word. Equally useful. "Antisemitism." Massie said the lobby was buying his race. They spent $32 million. That is buying. He called his replacement a puppet. The replacement was funded ninety-one percent by three men from New York and Las Vegas. That is a puppet. Karl Rove said Massie's description was "borderline antisemitic." The Jewish press said his AIPAC Act "leaned into antisemitic dual loyalty tropes." Describing a purchase as a purchase is antisemitism. Describing a puppet as a puppet is antisemitism. Accuracy is antisemitism when accuracy threatens the mechanism. I find this very useful. They call themselves "pro-Israel." Let me explain what this means. It means they support my government. Not my country. Not my people. My government. The government that appointed a convicted terrorism supporter as its security minister. "Pro-Israel" means pro-me. It means pro-the-video. Pro-the-flag. Pro-the-loudspeaker. Pro-four-hundred-people-on-their-knees. Because questioning any of this is "anti-Israel." Questioning the video is antisemitism. Questioning the $3.8 billion is antisemitism. Questioning why a convicted supporter of terrorism is in charge of national security is antisemitism. A nurse from Dublin carrying bandages is antisemitic. A retired teacher from Norway with baby formula is antisemitic. A congressman from Kentucky who voted against a spending bill is antisemitic. I am not antisemitic. I was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization and I kept a mass murderer's portrait on my wall and I paraded bound civilians on camera and I am not antisemitic. Because antisemitism means questioning me. And I do not question myself. The international response to my video was immediate. Italy summoned our ambassador. France summoned our ambassador. The Netherlands. Germany called it "wholly unacceptable." Britain's Foreign Secretary said she was "truly appalled." Ireland's Prime Minister raised it at the European Union level. Turkey recalled its ambassador entirely. The EU issued a formal condemnation. Six countries. Formal diplomatic action. Forty-eight hours. Six countries condemned with words. America condemned with silence. Words are free. Silence costs $32 million. Only one of them changes anything. The United States Congress said nothing. The body that writes the $3.8 billion check. The body containing 435 elected members with constitutional oversight authority. The only institution that could condition the money on our conduct. Said nothing. Zero statements. Zero resolutions. Zero hearings. Zero subcommittee inquiries. Not one member stood up after my video and said: perhaps we should discuss the conditions attached to this money. Not one. Because the one who would have was removed on Tuesday. I visited the port on Wednesday. The American envoy, Huckabee, called my video "despicable." He also called the flotilla "a stupid stunt." Both in the same breath. The minister who paraded bound civilians and the civilians who brought medicine: equally wrong. That is the art of American diplomacy. Every condemnation contains its own neutralization. "Despicable" is not a policy. It is a word. It costs nothing. It changes nothing. It exists so someone can say it and then everyone moves on. I understand words that exist so everyone can move on. I use them myself. "Security." "Protocol." "Deterrence." The Prime Minister rebuked me publicly. The Foreign Minister said I "caused harm to the state." He said I am "not the face of Israel." I am in his coalition. I am in his cabinet. I was given the ministry responsible for policing nine million people. I was given this ministry with my conviction on the public record. The Prime Minister read the file and handed me the keys. The Foreign Minister sat across the table from me every week for three years. And now he says I am not the face of Israel. Then who is? The man who kept me in his government? The minister who sits beside me at the cabinet table? The lobby that spends $32 million to ensure Americans cannot distinguish between "Israel" and "my ministry"? I am the face. That is why they need $32 million in Kentucky. So that nobody in the American Congress can describe what this face looks like without being called antisemitic. These are words that cost nothing. I remain in my ministry. The detainees remain in custody. The medicine remains in the warehouse. The rebukes were produced and consumed and nothing changed. That is what words do when power has been separated from language. They fill space. They provide sound. They permit continuation. Here is what I want you to understand. I was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization. The organization I supported carried out a massacre of twenty-nine people in a mosque. I kept the killer's portrait on my wall. I rose through politics without obstruction. I became the minister responsible for national security. I visited a port where four hundred people carrying medicine were bound and kneeling. I called them terrorists. I posted the video. I dared the world to react. The world reacted. Six countries summoned ambassadors. The EU condemned. The UN condemned. Everyone condemned. Everyone used words. The United States Congress was silent. The only institution on earth whose words carry $3.8 billion in weight. Because the only voice that would have spoken was silenced last Tuesday in Kentucky. For $32 million. By the same organizations that exist to ensure the $3.8 billion continues flowing to the government I serve without conditions, without oversight, without anyone asking what a convicted supporter of terrorism does with a flag and four hundred kneeling people and a loudspeaker. I know what a terrorist looks like. He looks like anyone I point at. That is what the stamp means. That is what power means. That is what $32 million in Kentucky purchased: not a congressman's seat, but the silence that lets me point at whoever I choose and call them what I was convicted of being. The medicine is in a warehouse at Ashdod. Three hundred tons. Baby formula. Surgical supplies. Bandages for wounds that will go undressed. It will not reach the people it was sent to. It will expire on a shelf. Not because anyone ordered it to expire. Because nobody ordered it delivered. Inaction requires no signature. That is its beauty. That is what $32 million purchases: not a crime, but the absence of a question. The absence is perfect. The absence is permanent. The four hundred people who brought it are in detention. The man who would have demanded a hearing about it is packing boxes in Kentucky. Welcome to the State of Israel. We are in charge here.
English
108
375
783
57K
Fénix_XY
Fénix_XY@Fenix_XY·
2 mayo 1963 Llega al número 1 en UK el single From Me To You de The Beatles. Su primer #1 y uno de los momentos clave en la Historia del rock. youtu.be/crOtY7VksrM?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
Español
1
0
0
45
ME Music
ME Music@espofootball·
From Me to You is Tye Beatles first official UK #1, a point of debate among music historians.  Please Please Me actually reached #1 on the majority of British charts at the time, including the NME and Melody Maker. However Please Please Me only reached #2 on the Record Retailer chart. Since the Record Retailer data is the definitive historical canon for the 1960s #1s in the UK. From Me to You is cemented as their first official number one
English
1
0
1
13
ME Music
ME Music@espofootball·
May2,1963 The Beatles start a 7wk run at #1 on the UK singles chart with "From Me To You" written by Paul McCartney and John Lennon. The Beatles first #1. 1st of 11 consecutive #1 singles, not including releases with Tony Sheridan
ME Music tweet media
English
2
1
3
95
Matthew Stiles
Matthew Stiles@MatthewStiles2·
@beatlesmuseum_ Though for a lot of people at the time, Please Please Me was the first number 1 because it was no 1 on the NME and Melody Maker charts. I am pretty sure that Mark Lewisohn thinks Please Please Me should be regarded as the first no 1
English
1
0
2
587
Liverpool Beatles Museum
Liverpool Beatles Museum@beatlesmuseum_·
On this day in 1963 the Beatles secured their first ever number 1 hit with "From Me to You" 🎸 The song topped the Record Retailer chart and stayed there for seven weeks! 👀✨ This marked the beginnings of the Beatles UK chart domination and cemented them as the number one group in the Britain ⭐🎙️
Liverpool Beatles Museum tweet media
English
3
8
33
543
Eric Alper 🎧
Eric Alper 🎧@ThatEricAlper·
On this day in 1963, The Beatles hit No. 1 on the UK singles chart with "From Me To You" — their very first chart-topper, and the start of a record-breaking run of eleven consecutive No. 1s.
Eric Alper 🎧 tweet media
English
1
6
33
2K
Beatlesfab4ever
Beatlesfab4ever@Beatlesfab40·
OTD 04MAY1963 The #Beatles third single ‘From Me To You' reaches number 1 in the UK (UK Record Retailer chart). #TheBeatles
English
2
60
328
5K
Rock History Live!
Rock History Live!@KTrain939913·
Today in Rock History May 8, 1963 The Beatles scored their first UK #1 hit with “From Me to You,” though the song had little impact in America, where The Beatles were still largely unknown.
Rock History Live! tweet media
English
2
2
8
208
Monica 💙🌻🏳️‍🌈
Name another song that mentions the word "From." 🎶 Written by the Lennon-McCartney duo & first released in the UK in April 1963, the Beatles earn their first #1 hit on what would be the UK Singles Chart on May 8, 1963 with their 3rd single, "From Me To You." It didn't fair well in the US at all, selling only 4,000 copies after it's 1st release in May 1963. A US re-release in 1964 saw the song peak at #41 on the Billboard Hot 100.
Monica 💙🌻🏳️‍🌈 tweet media
English
197
29
103
3K
_
_@k_i_temp·
why do we let musicians get away with self titled albums? any musician who does this should be shunned. Career over. Imagine if we let Quentin Tarantino release a self titled movie, or Dan Brown release a self titled book. Its got to stop.
English
1
0
0
21