
FedUp1stGen
1.1K posts

FedUp1stGen
@FedUp1stGen
1st-gen born in the UK, joined the British Army as a thank you to the UK. I love England 🏴🇬🇧 LLB (Hons) - Lawyer working in AM
uk Beigetreten Ağustos 2025
91 Folgt10 Follower

@JujuliaGrace Neither Minimum wage nor tax are set by the market though so this seems somewhat of a pointless statement. The best thing Peter could do make it work is to automate where he can, and avoid (legally) as much tax as possible. Just like the big multinationals. Is that the aim?
English


@litewhisperer "Calibrate tax and spend means the limiting factor is still tax revenue. From the above statement we can conclude that in MMT the gap between Tax and Spend is inflation... the larger the gap the larger the inflation. So MMT offers... nothing. We are back to being limited by tax.
English

Critics say MMT treats inflation like an on/off switch. False. It's a continuous variable – a dimmer, not a binary. Calibrate taxes and spending, don't panic. #MMT #MacroEconomics

English

"If you can just print money, why do I pay taxes?" This question sounds like a killer critique. But it's built on a misunderstanding of how monetary sovereigns actually operate. The error? Confusing household logic with government operations. #MMT

Institute of Economic Affairs@iealondon
🧾 @EMaggiori_ : "MMT was born out of an accounting mistake — they thought whenever the government collects taxes, the money disappears. They literally destroy the money." Emmanuel Maggiori exposes the error at the heart of Modern Monetary Theory. 👇
English

@FedUp1stGen @PeterMcCormack Matey , you folk are going to end up looking back at the MMTers wistfully at this rate, believe …
English

After an afternoon of arguing with socialists, here it is...
These people are impossibly and dangerously stupid. They are making up policies as they go which will cause nothing but economic destruction.
It is evident when arguing with them they have little to no understanding of the reality of economics and their ideas come from envy.
They are predators.
But... this was caused by the state itself:
1. Allowing leftism to take over the institutions
2. Buidling an education system with baked in Marxism
3. Failing to control inflation
We are in very dangerous times.
English

A clown critiquing MMT.
This is the worst/ best straw man ever.
🤣🤣🤣
Institute of Economic Affairs@iealondon
🧾 @EMaggiori_ : "MMT was born out of an accounting mistake — they thought whenever the government collects taxes, the money disappears. They literally destroy the money." Emmanuel Maggiori exposes the error at the heart of Modern Monetary Theory. 👇
English

@Keynesaholic @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips The entire thread is what *is* a bond not what is it used for or why.
English

@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips We can call it a dingbat fart pillow…it doesn’t really matter what we call it. It matters what they are used for and it matters that we also know what they are not used for. You seem to care what it “is”; I care about what they do. You must argue about words for a living…
English

@richyphillips @clintballinger So it’s not useful 👍 (which I said one can argue right at the start of this). That doesn’t change if a bond is/is not a debt security.
English

@FedUp1stGen @clintballinger As I explained.
It is functionally meaningless to a currency issuer.
Changing a number on an electronic ledger, adding +10 to - 10 = 0
Every £10 of reserves that are exchanged for £10 of bonds have exactly zero value to the issuer of £s.
English

@MMTLabour @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Not relevant to if a bond is or is not a debt security.
English

@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips But the govt is the monopoly issuer of the currency in which the bond is traded. You can't buy a UST unless you hold USD. The govt is not borrowing its own liabilities back. That's nonsensical. The purpose for govt bond issuance is not to borrow that which it issues.
English

@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips You are arguing from a fixed exchange rate perspective. The govt operates a free floating currency. No bond issuance is required to fund govt spending. That would be the case under fixed currency regimes. The US is not on the Gold Standard any longer. Your analysis is out of date
English

@Keynesaholic @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Whether you use is to fund government or not changes *what it is* how?
It doesnt. you are confusing need for function.
English

@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Meaning purpose/function is not to “pay” for things, but rather, as a vehicle that acts an alternative to current consumption, which gives savers what they want and allows government to dampen excess demand.
English

@richyphillips @Dforcegripxy @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 Updating its vocab 😂 thanks for tacitly acknowledging that you’re inventing new definitions for something that already has one. Not based on what it is but what you think it should be.
English

@Dforcegripxy @FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 If orthodox economics can't update its own vocabulary to match 21st century central banking, why should anyone trust its other claims?
English

@RCPILOT177583 @richyphillips @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 You don’t need to RC. I have a working understanding of reality. It’s you that seems to be labouring under a weird conspiracy theory and need to obfuscate.
English

@richyphillips @clintballinger No. But to your point if your drive your car into a lake it’s not a boat. It’s still a car. A debt security is still a debt security even if you don’t need it
English

@FedUp1stGen @clintballinger That is a complete contradiction.
"You can borrow your own car"
WTAF!??
It's your car!
This is a meaningless argument.
Especially for a currency issuer.
English

@richyphillips @RCPILOT177583 @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 Nope. You’re trying to refine what a thing is based on your interpretation of it being needed.
English

@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 You've confused form with function. The label doesn't tell you why it exists. Look at central bank operations, not dictionary definitions.
"Printing money" is another example of the orthodoxy clinging to a term that no longer describes reality.
There are many more.
English

@richyphillips @tezlefty @ProfHall1955 Really? I wonder why no asset manager on the planet says investing in gilts if 100% risk free then? They must all be wrong I guess.
English

@FedUp1stGen @tezlefty @ProfHall1955 You are guaranteed to receive the coupon payments and the return of the principle, whilst the issuer exists.
English

@tezlefty @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips You've missed the point.
It is not 100% guaranteed - there is no risk free rate, that is a theoretical benchmark (which is well understood in finance) to which US and UK bonds are used as the closest proxy to it.
English

@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Exactly. It’s a remnant of when govts used to need to raise funds for war spending then it became another tool to remove excess money/ demand from circulation to keep inflation down, just like other interest bearing deposit accounts, but it’s 100% guaranteed - bc fiat currency
English

@tezlefty @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Stuffing money under the mattress does the same thing.
Thats not a bond.
You're confusing what a thing is, with if it is needed or not.
English

@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Why argue terminology? Bonds draw money out of the economy in the same way interest bearing savings accounts do, parking money.
But interest yield on a fiat currency bond is not an outlay like a bank's bc govt doesn't sell goods, services or assets to get the money to pay it.
English

@RCPILOT177583 @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips It seems to me MMTers can't differentiate between need and function & because of that resort to name calling and endless red herrings and special pleading and construction fallacies.
You then claim everyone is just dumb for not accepting your (wrong) reality defying assumptions
English

@Dforcegripxy @FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Must be shit having a frontal lobe like a washboard.
English

@clintballinger @richyphillips You can borrow your own money. Whether you need to is not the same as if you can.
English

@FedUp1stGen @richyphillips You cannot borrow your own currency- the promissory note is just more currency
English

@Keynesaholic @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Relevant to whether a bond is a debt security or not how?
English

@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Might I add something that might provide a bit of clarity. If we look at war bonds issued by the U.S. government during WWII, the purpose was not to fundraise for the war effort…they were a place to park people’s savings in order to depress/mitigate demand and control inflation.
English
