FedUp1stGen

1.1K posts

FedUp1stGen

FedUp1stGen

@FedUp1stGen

1st-gen born in the UK, joined the British Army as a thank you to the UK. I love England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 LLB (Hons) - Lawyer working in AM

uk Beigetreten Ağustos 2025
91 Folgt10 Follower
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@JujuliaGrace Neither Minimum wage nor tax are set by the market though so this seems somewhat of a pointless statement. The best thing Peter could do make it work is to automate where he can, and avoid (legally) as much tax as possible. Just like the big multinationals. Is that the aim?
English
0
0
0
497
Dr Julia Grace Patterson💙
I’m presuming you’re a capitalist. As such I assume you’ll accept that your coffee shop is a failing business if you can’t afford to pay people properly. The market always knows best, right? 🤷‍♀️
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
271
122
940
52.6K
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@litewhisperer "Calibrate tax and spend means the limiting factor is still tax revenue. From the above statement we can conclude that in MMT the gap between Tax and Spend is inflation... the larger the gap the larger the inflation. So MMT offers... nothing. We are back to being limited by tax.
English
0
0
0
1
?whispers?
?whispers?@litewhisperer·
Critics say MMT treats inflation like an on/off switch. False. It's a continuous variable – a dimmer, not a binary. Calibrate taxes and spending, don't panic. #MMT #MacroEconomics
?whispers? tweet media
English
2
1
4
46
?whispers?
?whispers?@litewhisperer·
"If you can just print money, why do I pay taxes?" This question sounds like a killer critique. But it's built on a misunderstanding of how monetary sovereigns actually operate. The error? Confusing household logic with government operations. #MMT
?whispers? tweet media
Institute of Economic Affairs@iealondon

🧾 @EMaggiori_ : "MMT was born out of an accounting mistake — they thought whenever the government collects taxes, the money disappears. They literally destroy the money." Emmanuel Maggiori exposes the error at the heart of Modern Monetary Theory. 👇

English
4
10
39
1.8K
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
After an afternoon of arguing with socialists, here it is... These people are impossibly and dangerously stupid. They are making up policies as they go which will cause nothing but economic destruction. It is evident when arguing with them they have little to no understanding of the reality of economics and their ideas come from envy. They are predators. But... this was caused by the state itself: 1. Allowing leftism to take over the institutions 2. Buidling an education system with baked in Marxism 3. Failing to control inflation We are in very dangerous times.
English
315
535
3.9K
64.8K
Keynesaholic Khris
Keynesaholic Khris@Keynesaholic·
@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips We can call it a dingbat fart pillow…it doesn’t really matter what we call it. It matters what they are used for and it matters that we also know what they are not used for. You seem to care what it “is”; I care about what they do. You must argue about words for a living…
English
1
0
1
29
Richard Phillips
Richard Phillips@richyphillips·
To buy a bond, you need £s. Those £s came from prior govt spending. There is no other source. Therefore: bonds are not "lending" the govt its own currency. They are a savings scheme for people with excess income. The govt's ability to spend does not depend on bonds. It never did.
English
30
74
157
8.4K
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@richyphillips @clintballinger So it’s not useful 👍 (which I said one can argue right at the start of this). That doesn’t change if a bond is/is not a debt security.
English
0
0
0
6
Richard Phillips
Richard Phillips@richyphillips·
@FedUp1stGen @clintballinger As I explained. It is functionally meaningless to a currency issuer. Changing a number on an electronic ledger, adding +10 to - 10 = 0 Every £10 of reserves that are exchanged for £10 of bonds have exactly zero value to the issuer of £s.
English
1
0
1
20
MMT for Progressives
MMT for Progressives@MMTLabour·
@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips But the govt is the monopoly issuer of the currency in which the bond is traded. You can't buy a UST unless you hold USD. The govt is not borrowing its own liabilities back. That's nonsensical. The purpose for govt bond issuance is not to borrow that which it issues.
English
1
0
2
32
MMT for Progressives
MMT for Progressives@MMTLabour·
@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips You are arguing from a fixed exchange rate perspective. The govt operates a free floating currency. No bond issuance is required to fund govt spending. That would be the case under fixed currency regimes. The US is not on the Gold Standard any longer. Your analysis is out of date
English
1
0
2
30
Keynesaholic Khris
Keynesaholic Khris@Keynesaholic·
@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Meaning purpose/function is not to “pay” for things, but rather, as a vehicle that acts an alternative to current consumption, which gives savers what they want and allows government to dampen excess demand.
English
1
0
1
35
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@richyphillips @clintballinger No. But to your point if your drive your car into a lake it’s not a boat. It’s still a car. A debt security is still a debt security even if you don’t need it
English
0
0
0
6
Richard Phillips
Richard Phillips@richyphillips·
@FedUp1stGen @clintballinger That is a complete contradiction. "You can borrow your own car" WTAF!?? It's your car! This is a meaningless argument. Especially for a currency issuer.
English
1
0
1
21
Richard Phillips
Richard Phillips@richyphillips·
@FedUp1stGen @RCPILOT177583 @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 You've confused form with function. The label doesn't tell you why it exists. Look at central bank operations, not dictionary definitions. "Printing money" is another example of the orthodoxy clinging to a term that no longer describes reality. There are many more.
English
2
0
4
30
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@tezlefty @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips You've missed the point. It is not 100% guaranteed - there is no risk free rate, that is a theoretical benchmark (which is well understood in finance) to which US and UK bonds are used as the closest proxy to it.
English
1
0
0
24
Terry Constanti
Terry Constanti@tezlefty·
@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Exactly. It’s a remnant of when govts used to need to raise funds for war spending then it became another tool to remove excess money/ demand from circulation to keep inflation down, just like other interest bearing deposit accounts, but it’s 100% guaranteed - bc fiat currency
English
2
0
1
39
Terry Constanti
Terry Constanti@tezlefty·
@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Why argue terminology? Bonds draw money out of the economy in the same way interest bearing savings accounts do, parking money. But interest yield on a fiat currency bond is not an outlay like a bank's bc govt doesn't sell goods, services or assets to get the money to pay it.
English
1
0
0
26
FedUp1stGen
FedUp1stGen@FedUp1stGen·
@RCPILOT177583 @Dforcegripxy @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips It seems to me MMTers can't differentiate between need and function & because of that resort to name calling and endless red herrings and special pleading and construction fallacies. You then claim everyone is just dumb for not accepting your (wrong) reality defying assumptions
English
2
0
0
18
Keynesaholic Khris
Keynesaholic Khris@Keynesaholic·
@FedUp1stGen @ProfHall1955 @richyphillips Might I add something that might provide a bit of clarity. If we look at war bonds issued by the U.S. government during WWII, the purpose was not to fundraise for the war effort…they were a place to park people’s savings in order to depress/mitigate demand and control inflation.
English
2
0
3
96