Fizzle

4.7K posts

Fizzle

Fizzle

@FizzleDeeDee

Beigetreten Kasım 2023
8 Folgt295 Follower
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@dr_musgrave It's odd. 'Freedom of choice' but we require children to go to school. 'Freedom of choice' but we don't let children drink alcohol. Social media is more harm than good for children.
English
0
0
0
4
Dr Katie Musgrave
Dr Katie Musgrave@dr_musgrave·
It baffles me that so many people appear invested in keeping children ON devices, and using social media. Why? Genuinely. 🤷‍♀️ Do we really think the benefits outweigh the harms?
English
1.7K
16
325
82.5K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@MsMelChen Oh puleeeeez... Sure, click bait headline, but who the F is getting triggered by this?!? The USA has enough psychos with guns and mental issues, it doesn't require any journalist to light fuses.
English
0
0
0
2
Melissa Chen
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen·
They chose that headline and photo on purpose. It’s clear they are hoping to inspire the next Luigi Mangione. We still don’t hate journalists enough.
Melissa Chen tweet media
English
369
835
10.9K
208.8K
kkiran
kkiran@kkiran·
@FizzleDeeDee @SawyerMerritt If you are 100% sure, you should go all in and short. The problem is it might just do the opposite. Cheering the millionaires made from SpaceX!
English
1
0
0
17
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
SpaceX stock closed its second day of trading up 19.6% today, pushing the company's market cap above $2.5 trillion for the first time. SpaceX added $420 billion to its market cap today.
English
207
360
5.7K
650.5K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@tpgoebel Bigger question is how did you resist popping, pushing or prodding it?
GIF
English
1
0
1
2.3K
Tobias Goebel (Unsupervised)
Uhm… I thought the Cybercab chassis was made out of polyurethane with pre-injected coloring? How can there be a paint bubble on it? I spotted this in Peabody MA today.
English
74
9
257
119.8K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@CARN0N Wow, the handling there was incredible. Any other vehicle would have spun out. Tesla really cooked!
English
0
0
0
68
Oli
Oli@CARN0N·
The Model 3 Performance is absurd on dirt roads. By constantly adjusting torque between the front and rear motors hundreds of times per second, it’s finding grip before most drivers even realise it’s needed. Whether it’s mud, loose gravel, standing water or a road that’s changing corner by corner, this thing just stays planted. For a car with over 500 horsepower, that’s ridiculous.
English
29
16
365
82.3K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@APompliano @elonmusk No upside on merging his companies. Separate companies allow targeted investment. I bet most people buying SpaceX would prefer not to carry the dead weight of 𝕏 for instance, and those who are green investing in Tesla aren't keen on 100 rocket launches a day!
English
0
0
1
259
Anthony Pompliano 🌪
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano·
As a Tesla shareholder, I hope @elonmusk merges Tesla with SpaceX as soon as possible. Give us one company to bet on this generation’s greatest entrepreneur. $TSLA $SPCX
English
269
130
3.4K
204.7K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@BenjaminDEKR I think Elon should run a post hook script that blanks out all dates in his posts. "We understand what needs to be done and will get pretty close by ***** and roughly similar by *****, so probably better by ***** when Colossus 2 is fully operational."
English
0
0
0
217
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@vtech88_the_one And in the bright glare of the sun you can't even tell the difference in the gfx 🤣
English
0
0
0
3
lorenzo rhoades
lorenzo rhoades@RhoadesLorenzo·
@ByrneHobart i believe him, and am not discounting what he's saying, but "think" and "might" carry alot of legal weight here.
English
1
0
0
3.4K
Byrne Hobart
Byrne Hobart@ByrneHobart·
I'm not a securities lawyer, but I think they may technically have to file an updated prospectus with this guidance. Also, I think there's no safe harbor here as there would be with regular guidance. Fun times.
Byrne Hobart tweet media
English
107
85
2.2K
351.3K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@SawyerMerritt That's what Elon does though. Says this stuff, pumps the stock, 2030 comes and revenue is $200B and he says 'yeah 2035 now', stock price stays up, multiples stay in the 100x. Eventually it won't work.....surely!
English
0
0
2
171
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@elonmusk Tell us what you REALLY think Elon. Interesting as in 'that's crazy!' or interesting as in 'not what we forecast' or interesting as in 'I hadn't thought of that'.
English
0
2
4
26
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Interesting analysis
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

SpaceX a clôturé son premier jour de cotation à 2 100 milliards de dollars, +19%. Tout le monde regarde le chiffre. Personne ne regarde ce qu'il price réellement. Laissez-moi vous dire ce que le marché vient d'acheter, et pourquoi je pense que cette boîte vaudra 30 à 50 trillions d'ici 5 ans. D'abord, le symbole. Cette IPO est un référendum. D'un côté, 20 ans de discours sur la décroissance, la sobriété, la redistribution, la fin de l'histoire gérée par des comités. De l'autre, un homme qui a dit "je vais rendre l'humanité multiplanétaire", que tout le monde a traité de clown, et qui vient de créer la plus grosse entreprise cotée de l'histoire en partant d'un entrepôt à El Segundo. Le marché a voté. Le wokisme avait des départements RH, SpaceX avait des fusées. Les fusées ont gagné. Ensuite, la mécanique économique, parce que c'est là que tout le monde se trompe. Les analystes valorisent SpaceX comme une entreprise de lancement plus Starlink. C'est comme valoriser Internet en 1995 sur le marché du fax. Starship ne réduit pas le coût du kilo en orbite de 20%, il le divise par 100. Et chaque fois dans l'histoire qu'un coût d'infrastructure est divisé par 100, ce n'est pas le marché existant qui grossit, ce sont des industries entières qui naissent. Le coût du calcul divisé par 100 a donné Internet, le smartphone, l'IA. Le coût de l'orbite divisé par 100 va donner une économie spatiale complète. Faisons la liste de ce qui devient rentable quand le kilo en orbite coûte le prix d'un billet d'avion. Les data centers orbitaux, avec énergie solaire continue et refroidissement gratuit, au moment exact où l'IA fait exploser la demande énergétique terrestre. La fabrication en microgravité de semi-conducteurs, de fibres optiques, d'organes imprimés impossibles à produire sous gravité. Le tourisme orbital de masse, puis les hôtels lunaires, qui passeront du fantasme au business plan exactement comme la croisière de luxe au 20ème siècle. Le transport point à point terrestre, Paris-Tokyo en 40 minutes. L'industrie minière des astéroïdes, dont un seul corps de classe M contient plus de métaux que tout ce que l'humanité a extrait depuis le néolithique. Et Mars en ligne de mire, pas comme destination touristique, mais comme le plus grand projet d'infrastructure jamais entrepris, avec tout ce que ça implique de demande en énergie, matériaux, robotique, IA. SpaceX ne participera pas à ces marchés. SpaceX possède le péage d'entrée de tous ces marchés. C'est AWS, mais pour la civilisation. Apple vaut 3 500 milliards en vendant des rectangles de verre sur une seule planète. Le premier monopole d'accès à une frontière infinie à 30 ou 50 trillions dans 5 ans, ce n'est pas de l'exubérance, c'est une simple règle de trois sur l'expansion du marché adressable. Et maintenant, la partie que je préfère. Ce futur n'a pas besoin de bureaucrates. Il n'y a pas de comité consultatif en orbite. Pas de commission Théodule sur Mars. Chaque dollar de cette nouvelle économie sera créé par des ingénieurs, des techniciens, des soudeurs, des pilotes, des entrepreneurs. Les diplômés en gestion de la norme vont devoir apprendre un métier utile, et franchement, c'est une excellente nouvelle pour eux aussi : construire est infiniment plus fun que contrôler. Parce que c'est ça, le vrai signal d'aujourd'hui. Pendant 50 ans on nous a vendu un futur rétréci : moins d'énergie, moins d'enfants, moins d'ambition, gérer le déclin proprement. Et là, d'un coup, le plus gros actif financier du monde est un pari sur l'abondance, l'expansion et l'aventure. Le pessimisme vient de passer en position vendeuse sur lui-même. Le futur sera méga fun. Il y aura des hôtels avec vue sur la Terre, des honeymoons en orbite, des gamins qui diront "papa, c'était comment avant les fusées réutilisables" comme on dit "c'était comment avant Internet". Et quelque part dans les années 2030, un humain marchera sur Mars en livestream devant 5 milliards de personnes, et ce jour-là plus personne ne se souviendra du nom d'un seul de ses détracteurs. Achetez de l'optimisme. C'est encore sous-valorisé.

English
3.5K
9.6K
72.9K
28.5M
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@Zoe_922q Didn't they just refresh it? Seems to be on a 5 year cycle.
English
0
0
2
227
Zoe
Zoe@Zoe_922q·
Elon confirmed no Model Y refresh this year, but looking at this... why would you even want one? This view is already peak perfection
Zoe tweet media
English
31
10
397
33.4K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@HimBivins @thomasj78698152 @Tr00peRR Didn't even notice he was black until I watched it a second time. Anyone brushing their teeth outside their bathroom is a red flag to me.
English
1
0
5
188
The Daily Sneed™
The Daily Sneed™@Tr00peRR·
you’re followed and see this at your door, wut do ?
English
1.8K
1K
7.4K
736.1K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@Mystikart_ Why so many wishlists and not sales? Is it priced too high? 🤔
English
0
0
0
27
Mystik'art | Mesoké on Steam
So my game flopped after 3 years of work...😢 Since its release on May 26th, I've sold 77 copies... Streamers and curious gamers loved it. I have 2800 wishlists, 800 of which are from the release date.... What do you think? Be honest.🙏 store.steampowered.com/app/3239940/Me…
English
653
544
3.3K
1.5M
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@Teslarati Mentioned the ⚡ cost but didn't mention the FSD cost or premium subscription cost 🤔
English
2
1
3
20.1K
TESLARATI
TESLARATI@Teslarati·
A buddy of mine asked me last night, “Is that Tesla worth it?” I said I paid $18 to charge my car for a month, I rarely drive it because it drives for me, when I’m waiting for my girl while she’s in Target, I can watch YouTube or Netflix in my car that has an amazing sound system. Is it worth it? You tell me.
TESLARATI tweet media
English
66
68
952
29.8K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@SawyerMerritt @Tesla That is bonkers that the roof cost that much. How can it possibly make any financial sense?!
English
0
0
3
207
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
A home in Maui is one sale for $26.5 million and comes with a $1.4 million @Tesla Solar Tile Roof. They claim it's the largest residential Tesla Solar Tile Roof in the U.S. Doesn't say how many kW it is though.
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
189
216
4.3K
436.7K
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@america Who wrote this? An American? Problem with an American saying this is they've never even been to another country 🤣
English
0
0
0
3
America
America@america·
America is the greatest country in the world and it’s not even close 🇺🇸
English
8.1K
7.5K
74.6K
11M
Fizzle
Fizzle@FizzleDeeDee·
@The_AI_Investor I'm surprised these guys can't get by on just a billion...
English
0
0
0
133
The AI Investor
The AI Investor@The_AI_Investor·
Jensen Huang owned roughly 10–13% of NVIDIA around the IPO. Today, he owns about 3.6–3.7%. That may seem low for someone who spent 30+ years building the company, unlike many mega-cap founders, the biggest reason is not founder selling. For comparison: Jeff Bezos has sold $45B+ of Amazon stock over time. Elon Musk has sold $40B+ of Tesla stock. Mark Zuckerberg has sold $20B+ of Meta stock. Jensen Huang’s lifetime sales are estimated to be only a small fraction of that, likely in the low single-digit billions. The biggest reason Jensen’s ownership percentage fell was NVIDIA issuing stock to employees and using equity to grow the company over the past three decades. Other contributors include stock-based acquisitions and some founder share sales over the years. In other words, Jensen gave up ownership percentage to build a much bigger company.
The AI Investor@The_AI_Investor

Elon owns about 42% of SpaceX. It does feel a bit unfair when you compare that to Jensen. He has spent more than 30 years building NVIDIA into one of the world’s most valuable companies, yet today owns only about 3.77% of the shares.

English
11
17
408
103.9K