Frag0Light

@theblessedsalt How does it feel to be so retarded?

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

@JackTheCancerK1 @thehealthb0t Questions are not allowed if one positive case exists.

@thehealthb0t Im alive because of cancer research Pick another hill to die on Until you get that diagnoses you have No point of reference for that post Im in remission

Does anyone else find it odd that $200 billion is spent on cancer research every single year and the only thing to show for it is a 75% increase in cancer deaths since the 1990s?

@ekonomigurun_ 50k$

Gissa bitcoin vid nyår 23:59. Närmast vinner 1000kr. Andra vinner 500kr. Skriv vad du tror. Går bara skicka in förslag nu under April. Måste följa mig för att kunna vinna 💰

@GiaMMacool @CasualNerd11 You are reading into things that he isnt saying. He is saying that a person will mostly follow something if they want to. And they have to keep wanting to. For the ones that never followed to begin with, you have to be mean to. Because they refuse and they rebel. Or something

All you did was complain. You essentially said: 
“Even if you do everything right, you’re still dependent on a woman continually choosing to stay.” That’s not only shortsighted, it’s wrong. And it’s the same flawed mindset that led to my original tweet in the first place. This is exactly why I spoke about structure, leadership, and responsibility in marriage. Because what you’re really saying is: “Why bother? She’ll change anyway.” No. That’s not accurate. I’ve already written extensively on this: women don’t just randomly “change.” In healthy relationships, women are remarkably consistent in one thing, they respond to leadership, stability, and direction in the home. I’ve been with the same man for over three decades. He didn’t reinvent himself. I didn’t “switch up.” Why? Because he understood something most men miss: a woman wants a man who leads in his home, not a man who goes passive and then blames women for reacting to it. Here’s where a lot of men go wrong: They get married and treat it like a finish line. 
They stop leading themselves first fitness, finances, discipline, presence. 
Then they expect respect without structure or self-control And when she starts to feel that vacuum, they call it “women changing.” No. That’s misreading cause and effect. Change shows up early: •in tone •in responsiveness •in emotional energy •in attraction patterns If you’re paying attention, you don’t miss it. If you’re not, you wake up confused why she wants a divorce Women don’t “suddenly switch.” They respond to what’s been building for a long time. And yes, women resent having to lead the emotional and structural direction of a home. That’s polarity being lost. And women are good at noticing this When polarity is gone, attraction erodes. That’s predictable, not mysterious. So the real issue isn’t “female solipsism.” The issue is men who disengage and then label the outcome as inevitability. Because I also know plenty of long-term marriages, including my own, where the man didn’t suddenly “change” for the worse or better. He stayed consistent. He led. He paid attention. He didn’t outsource responsibility for the relationship and then act surprised by the result. That’s the part missing from your argument: accountability on the male side inside the relationship, not just effort at the beginning. And let’s be honest, never in history has it been easier for a man to improve himself. Fitness, income, discipline, communication, purpose, everything is accessible. The bar isn’t “be perfect.” The bar is: don’t disengage and then blame the other person for reacting to your absence. So if the response to relationship failure is always: “women will eventually change anyway,” then you’ve already opted out of leadership. And that’s the real problem. Because if someone points out where you need to improve and your only response is “women can’t be trusted,” you’re not analyzing reality, you’re avoiding responsibility. And that’s exactly why some men stay stuck. Not because women are unpredictable but because they’ve stopped leading and called it philosophy. End of story.

It makes me laugh when men complain: “Women control everything.” “Women have all the power.” “It’s a female-centered world.” “Silence woman” Strong men do not talk like this 🤣 because strong men have no problem with women doing as they are told.  Men online screaming at women don’t actually get women in real life.

@EHellsborn @RichardJomshof Haha tack , jag måste varit trött

@Frag0L @RichardJomshof Det är Finlands flagga. 😆

Nu har jag i och för sig inga ambitioner att bli minister. Men när jag läser att det finns flera personer i SD:s toppskikt som ”många moderater helt utesluter som tänkbara ministrar”, däribland undertecknad, undrar jag om det inte är dags för mig att ändra uppfattning i den frågan. Kanske ska jag sträva efter en ministerpost trots allt. Jag kan garantera att det finns ”många sverigedemokrater” som har starka åsikter om såväl flera av regeringspartiernas nuvarande som kommande ministrar. Anser själv att några av dem är klart olämpliga, av flera olika anledningar. Men till skillnad från dessa moderater respekterar jag de olika partiernas interndemokrati och anser att det är upp till varje enskilt parti att välja sina egna företrädare. Men det krävs kanske en viss demokratisk mognad för att förstå det. Och där har vissa moderater uppenbarligen en hel del att lära.

@BillAckman Stop listening to this jew. He is jewish and he is gonna jew. No one should this crybaby jew. He will scam you

Some of the highest quality businesses in the world are trading at extremely cheap prices. Ignore the MSM. One of the most one-sided wars in history that will end well for the U.S. and the world. And we have the potential for a large peace dividend. One of the best times in a long time to buy quality. Ignore the bears.

@maneco1964 @DowdEdward Well, he is right about that. If you are talking about the cpi

@DowdEdward Powell is a muppet. He doesn't think QE was inflationary either.

Other than the fact that banks make loans to private credit lenders I guess he is right! 🤡

@AndreasSteno This post explains alot

I agree with this take

@IanCarrollShow What would it achieve?

Do it Tulsi!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 You legitimately have an opportunity to help save the world. A responsibility even.

@ecke101 @paolorobertocom Hahhaha du tror att låga skatter är extremt och Sveriges 55% skatt är normal?? Du är så sjukt hjärntvättad

@paolorobertocom Skitsnack, miljardärer kommer alltid flytta pengarna dit de betalar minst skatt oavsett. Det är Schweiz som är extremt, inte Sverige.

Ingvar Kamprad byggde IKEA i Småland. Ett av världens mest framgångsrika företag. Men på 70-talet lämnade han Sverige och flyttade till Schweiz. Skatterna var helt enkelt för höga. Där blev han kvar i nästan 40 år. Under tiden växte IKEA till ett globalt företag – men mycket av den privata beskattningen hamnade aldrig i Sverige. Uppskattningar har talat om upp mot 100 miljarder kronor i uteblivna skatteintäkter. Poängen är enkel: Entreprenörer skapar enorma värden. Men kapital stannar bara där villkoren är rimliga. Frågan är inte hur vi beskattar nästa Ingvar Kamprad. Frågan är om vi vill att nästa Ingvar Kamprad ska bo i Sverige.

@RettCopple And people wonder why women are spoiled these days

This is how you curse your posterity and leave no legacy. He probably lost her heart years ago. I am obsessed with providing housing to my children until, and even after, they are married. Especially my girls. There will be no reason for them to leave my roof/protection. Insane to think this way. Shameful. Lord, turn the hearts of the fathers to their children and the hearts of the children to their fathers!

@basedlayer Banks are worried of bank runs, Breaking news. Btw central banks dont run anything but bailouts

wait a minute, hold on here so the European Central Bank published a paper warning that stablecoin adoption could pull deposits out of the banking system I want you to read that again slowly a central bank is publicly worried that people might voluntarily move their money from banks to stablecoins the people who run the monetary system are admitting in an academic paper that their product might lose to a better product this is the music industry publishing a report in 2004 warning that people MIGHT prefer MP3s to CDs the diagnosis is correct the conclusion they'll draw from it will be to regulate the competition instead of improving their own product I watched this exact playbook when I worked at Universal Music back in 2008 the threat assessment was always accurate but the response was always protectionism and protectionism always lost

@haggistramp @Chizitere_xyz If what you claim is true, then you are the outlier. Stop being mad about generalizations. They are helpful to understand what is average n what is not. If you are confident you are not the average here, then just dont take any offense. Realize how other women are based on this

@Chizitere_xyz We? You maybe. You are telling on yourself. You might treat your husand like a piece of shit at a time when he needs help most, but leave the rest of us women out of it. 'We' aint you.

We women live a terrifying double life. A mother will look at her teenage son with absolute, boundless empathy. She will hold him when he cries, tell him his feelings matter, and pray to God that he finds a woman who loves him for his pure heart, not his wallet. But that exact same woman will turn around and look at her husband, who is literally someone else’s grown son and treat him like a malfunctioning piece of farm equipment if he loses his job or shows a moment of emotional fragility. We completely compartmentalize the fact that the men we drain, stress out, and demand traditional protection from were once little boys who were promised that their hearts mattered. ​ Look at the advice mothers pass down. It is pure, unfiltered hypocrisy. We sit our daughters down and say: "Never settle. Make sure he is a provider. If he is struggling financially, do not build him up, leave him. You deserve a King." But if a mother catches wind that her son's girlfriend is treating him that way? If her son loses his job and his girlfriend packs her bags? That mother will lose her mind. She will call the girlfriend a gold-digger. She will call her toxic. We are actively raising our daughters to become the exact type of women we pray our sons never meet.

@ItIsHoeMath I know white liberal women act like this. But im sure women of other colors are this way if they were allowed or in position too. Or they are moving that way. Might be some difference, but i remember seeing a japanese woman doing the worst of this aswell. So why empathize white?

Liberal white women are the cornerstone of the temple of satan. They are the most powerful cause of social decay. No one else would have the power to ruin our world like this without their help. They are the worst because they do the opposite of what they know they should. 1. They know what makes women valuable to society, and they reject it in favor of self-worship. 2. They fight against their own kind. Other agents of chaos fight us as enemies. They fight us as traitors. 3. They are aware of their own evils. They break eye contact and laugh nervously as they repeat their rehearsed deceptions. (Liberal white males are more likely to actually believe the nonsense they speak.) Liberal white women are like soldiers in a war who band together and say "we can only win this war if we give a little more territory to the enemy!" And then they silently take their own share when the enemy advances, only to be robbed of it later. And yet they still think "I could be the one to make this work!" Three generations of women. Half of them cannot think beyond their immediate personal desires. And they are followed by three generations of men who think they're "fighting the good fight" by supporting them. The solution to the problem is the same as it is for every problem in every time: be more of a man. Be the one who says what happens next.

@smelltheasphalt @leonardaisfunny Both are guilt. Both are bought and infiltrated. It is easy to see

The real questions why didn’t the Biden administration release the documents? What were they hiding? What were they destroying four years they had these documents and they didn’t release them President Trump a little over a year released all the documents with his name throughout the documents. Fact is what little has been released. Repeatedly uses not credible. You can’t hold the Republican Party responsible for the inaction of the Democratic Party.

If you’re looking at the Epstein files and only noticing when someone from the opposite political party is mentioned, you are missing the point. IT’S ALL OF THEM. THEY ALL HAVE TO GO.

@levenson_david What are your thoughts on gold? Is it gonna continue down or recover at some point within the short term?

@DBrozeLiveFree @NickJFuentes Let them play it until its dead. Dont you think it can be killed? Just like calling someone racist had a heavier meaning 10 years ago compared to today.

@NickJFuentes you're being artificially inflated by the algorithm (and the NYT) cause it serves the Predator Class to stoke more division and push people towards "its the Jews" which allows the Zionists to play the anti-semitism card.

I’m popular because I’m right about Jews. Not because of the economy or whatever.

@cleobug101 @AriesBased

@AriesBased Not me

the real solution is that men who witness this should step in and immediately kick his ass but no men are willing to do that anymore because of the gender war and women being generally less attractive in 2025 due to a lack of effort. beautiful/sweet women inspire men to protect instictually. that's why the “pick me” narrative is bad because “pick me” types are the exact kind of women that men rush to defend, the ones that are pleasant and pleasing to the male gaze.

@Philosophi_Cat @ItIsHoeMath is she correct?

It’s true that many women say they want a man who’s “in touch with his emotions,” yet get the "ick" when he expresses them. This can be bewildering for men, but the issue lies in how emotion is expressed, not in the fact of feeling it. Yes, women tend value a man who has emotional fluency and depth, someone who can articulate his inner world and empathise with hers. But they recoil when a man loses his composure, collapses emotionally and turns to her for emotional containment. The moment she has to soothe or stabilise him, when she must step into the role of his therapist or mother, the polarity between them collapses. She no longer feels his strength; she feels his need. And that is where the "ick" arises from. So this is the key distinction: Emotional depth does not mean emotional dumping. A man can speak openly about his struggles while remaining self-possessed and anchored in his own centre. He might say, “I’ve had a rough week and I'm working through some frustration, but I'll be fine,” rather than dissolving into self-pity or seeking reassurance. He shares what’s real without burdening her with it. His emotions are contained by his own form. That’s what women respond to: emotional transparency grounded in composure. It signals a robust and stable inner centre. It shows he can hold complexity without being consumed by it. By contrast, many men, fearing that any show of feeling will make them appear weak, over-correct by suppressing or hiding their emotions entirely. They present a stoic façade that keeps her at arm’s length. While this may preserve his ego, it starves intimacy. She feels locked out of his interior world, perhaps admiring and respecting him, but ultimately feeling exiled from his soul. This lack of emotional connection is far more painful for the woman, who (unlike the man) is not a self-sustaining principle. As the embodiment of the lunar principle, she requires reflection to feel whole, to know herself through the mirror of his awareness. When that mirror is blank, she loses the sense of being felt, and something in her begins to close. Both collapse and repression arise from the same root: disconnection from the solar centre. In the first, emotion floods the structure; in the second, the structure dams the flow. The true alternative (and what women are innately seeking in man when they say they want him to be "in touch" with his emotions) is one in which those feelings are governed by conscious form. The man is able to remain inwardly still while emotion moves through him; he neither denies it nor is swept away by it. That stillness is what allows him to hold space for the woman’s depths without being drowned by them. This is neither stoicism nor vulnerability, but a secret third thing: an inner sovereignty where emotion has been mastered by spirit rather than suppressed by force of will.