freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ

2.4K posts

freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ banner
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ

freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ

@FreeatMountier

Freedom is no tea party 🫖 it is war ⚔️ | $RUNE $FOX $VULT $VVV Believer | Tweets Not Financial Advice!

Beigetreten Mart 2024
832 Folgt271 Follower
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
boone
boone@BooneW·
Lots of other protocols in the same boat
CyberSatoshi 𓆙@XBToshi

circle just blacklisted @zama's cusdc contract. 12.6m of user funds instantly frozen. fully homomorphic encryption means absolutely nothing when the underlying asset has a master kill switch. zero transparency, same playbook as the 16 wallet freezes from march. wrapping fiat stablecoins in privacy math is just building sandcastles on their servers. permissionless tools cannot exist on top of permissioned assets. if they can pull the plug, you don't own the liquidity. true privacy requires base layer decentralization. stables.rip

English
4
3
22
2.8K
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
Venice
Venice@AskVenice·
Privacy is at the core of Venice: > Zero prompt logging > History stored on your device > Private chats and memory by default > Anonymous access to frontier models > TEE & E2EE when you need proof AI that doesn’t spy on you, with the right privacy mode for every prompt.
NEAR Protocol@NEARProtocol

.@askvenice launched end-to-end encrypted AI inference on NEAR AI Cloud. 4 privacy modes, up to full E2EE: prompts encrypted on-device and decrypted only inside a verified hardware enclave. Neither Venice nor the GPU operator see user data at any point. venice.ai/blog/venice-la…

English
19
57
479
50.2K
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
@rbthreek there are robotics coins?
English
52
0
36
15.2K
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
AI / privacy / perps seem to be the dominant themes for altcoins atm
English
382
87
1.3K
86.4K
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
Some credible Venice ecosystem projects that look like a good opportunity - 1. Strike Robot - $SR 2. Clude - $CLUDE 3. Hermes OS - $HERMESOS
English
1
0
2
95
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
$VVV singlehandedly bringing the bull run back
English
0
0
1
32
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
Vultisig is your post quantum wallet...
GIF
English
0
0
0
20
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
$Vult to the 🌙 Is your wallet quantum resistant?
English
1
0
4
80
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
Ash
Ash@Wayland_Six·
This new Nous Research paper may end up being one of the most economically important AI breakthroughs in years. Not because it makes models smarter. But because it may dramatically reduce the cost and time required to train them. Most people completely misunderstand what frontier AI training actually looks like. Training a modern large language model is not just “running ChatGPT on a computer.” It involves: - gigantic data centres filled with GPUs - enormous electricity usage - massive cooling infrastructure - months of nonstop computation - and training runs that can cost hundreds of millions of dollars And that’s before you even know if the experiment worked. Now imagine if someone finds a way to make that process 2-3x more efficient. → Not by changing the final AI model. → Not by inventing a whole new architecture. → But simply by changing HOW the model learns during training. That’s what makes this new Nous Research paper so important. The technique is called Token Superposition Training (TST). The simple explanation is this: Normally, an AI model learns language one token at a time. Word. Next word. Next word. Next word. Trillions and trillions of times. That process is incredibly expensive. What Nous is proposing is: during the early stages of training, the model may not actually need to learn every token individually yet. Instead, it can temporarily learn from compressed groups of tokens together. So instead of learning from: “The cat sat on the mat” as completely separate token predictions... the model briefly learns from blended groups of token information during early training. That sounds like it should completely break the model. But apparently...it doesn’t. Because later in training, the system switches back to normal token-by-token learning so the model can recover precision and refine itself properly. And according to their results: the final model quality remains competitive while training becomes dramatically faster. That’s the important part people are missing. The final inference model stays the same. Meaning: - no new chatbot architecture - no new serving stack - no retraining the entire ecosystem around a new model type - no weird compatibility layer Just: far more efficient training. That matters because the biggest bottleneck in AI right now is increasingly economics and infrastructure. The world is running out of: - high-end GPUs - power capacity - data centre infrastructure - training bandwidth AI progress is no longer just about: “who has the smartest researchers.” It’s increasingly about: “who can train and iterate fastest.” And iteration speed is everything. If a lab can: - train models faster - run more experiments - test more ideas - spend less money per run - and occupy GPU clusters for less time they accelerate their entire research loop. That compounds hard. Which is why algorithmic efficiency breakthroughs like this can become insanely important. Historically, software-level efficiency improvements often end up creating more impact than raw hardware improvements. And this paper is basically trying to do exactly that for LLM training. Now, important caveat: This has NOT yet been validated on frontier-scale trillion-parameter models. The paper tested: - 270M - 600M - 3B dense models - and a 10B MoE setup So nobody should pretend this is already proven at GPT-5.x scale. But if these results continue scaling upward... this could become one of those papers people look back on later and realise quietly changed the economics of AI training itself.
Nous Research@NousResearch

Today we release Token Superposition Training (TST), a modification to the standard LLM pretraining loop that produces a 2-3× wall-clock speedup at matched FLOPs without changing the model architecture, optimizer, tokenizer, or training data. During the first third of training, the model reads and predicts contiguous bags of tokens, averaging their embeddings on the input side and predicting the next bag with a modified cross-entropy on the output side. For the remainder of the run, it trains normally on next-token prediction. The inference-time model is identical to one produced by conventional pretraining. Validated at 270M, 600M, and 3B dense scales, and at 10B-A1B MoE. The work on TST was led by @bloc97_, @gigant_theo, and @theemozilla.

English
5
5
27
5.2K
THORChain
THORChain@THORChain·
Real yield from a decentralised protocol. @KentonC137 explains why THORChain could be a serious option for institutions and pension funds. 👇
English
3
7
69
5.7K
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
Runemir
Runemir@RunemirQi·
@AirdropGlideApp Thorchain + Rujira are the hub now.
English
1
1
16
153
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
Vultisig
Vultisig@vultisig·
Most wallets collect more than they admit. Our stance is simple: no IP logs, no analytics, no metadata trail. If the app does not need your data to function, it should not be harvesting it in the background.
Vultisig tweet media
English
5
9
48
1.5K
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ retweetet
THORChain
THORChain@THORChain·
First it was "Free Ross", now it's "Free Samourai Wallet." Sign the petition for their pardon. Writing code is not a crime. Privacy is a human right. c.org/r6ggGpHHBx via @Change
English
2
29
141
99.3K
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
Venice officially in the top 100 projects by marketcap $VVV
English
0
0
3
105
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ
freeat.thor⚡ ᚱ@FreeatMountier·
TC is what dec-infra should look like SC is what looks good now but can have u end up in the biggest rugpull wen it happens TC isnt built to judge & dupe u into believing that intervening selectively 4 'greater good' is its job Greater good can't exist w/o freedom tech like TC
Duo Nine ⚡ YCC@duonine

@bkiepuszewski Mate, this means the SC can be coerced by governments to take your coins. It’s not so simple. The SC may try to be impartial, but not when the Governments plans to send them to prison or comply with their request.

English
0
0
0
36