Haley Moller
27 posts

Haley Moller
@HaleyMoller
Notes toward an anthropology of AI-era San Francisco
San Francisco, CA Beigetreten Temmuz 2020
77 Folgt41 Follower
Haley Moller retweetet

“This raises an obvious question: how much of Anthropic’s reluctance to make Mythos widely available is due to security concerns, as opposed to the more prosaic reality that Anthropic simply doesn’t have enough compute?” @stratechery @benthompson
English

@garrytan Yes. If AI is going to be open and widely accessible, it needs public oversight, not oversight by the companies selling it. That is why we need an FDA for AI.
English

AI needs open markets and open access not whatever is happening here
Peter Steinberger 🦞@steipete
Yeah folks, it's gonna be harder in the future to ensure OpenClaw still works with Anthropic models.
English
Haley Moller retweetet

Haley Moller retweetet

*Finally* read through @samwhoo's blog on LLM quantization.
It's incredible.
For many (even in tech) the understanding of how LLMs work stops at the surface level. Sam is helping us all go deeper, digging into the interesting facets of how AI models truly work.
Read it!
English

Anthropic’s new Project Glasswing announcement contains the central problem of AI governance in miniature: the companies building these systems are also positioning themselves to define the terms of their safety. If AI is becoming critical infrastructure, we need an FDA for AI.
My new piece: x.com/HaleyMoller/st…
English


@AnthropicAI So the same companies building these systems (and profiting off of them) are also defining what “safe” means?
We didn’t let pharmaceutical companies regulate their own drugs. We built the FDA. AI is becoming infrastructure; it needs the same logic.
English

Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software.
It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans.
anthropic.com/glasswing
English

@garrytan Open source is cool, but is no one concerned about how easily tools like this could be repurposed for large-scale attacks or abuse?
English

Golden age of open source is here
ℏεsam@Hesamation
bro created an AI job search system for Claude Code that scored 700+ job applications and actually got him a job. AND IT'S NOW OPEN-SOURCE. It scans multiple company career pages, rewrites your CV per job, and even fills application forms. The repo has: > 14 skill modes (evaluate, scan, PDF, ...) > Go terminal dashboard > ATS-optimized PDF generation via Playwright > 45+ companies pre-configured (Anthropic, OpenAI, ElevenLabs, Stripe...) GitHub: github.com/santifer/caree…
English

Given how good large language models are at so many things, why can’t they write well? Read my answer to this question here: substack.com/home/post/p-19…
English

“We in America need ceremonies is I suppose, sailor, the point of what I have written.”
substack.com/home/post/p-19…
English

Does AI ever make you feel on top of the world? Well, you're not...
haleymoller.substack.com/p/the-new-mono…
English

Apparently the next step after Friedrich Nietzsche declared “God is dead” is replacing Him with AI assistants.
haleymoller.substack.com/p/the-new-idol…
English

The future, according to @ycombinator , belongs to B2A: business-to-agents. Software will no longer be designed primarily for humans, but for the little probabilistic homunculi we’ve built to do things on our behalf.
Agents will read the dashboards, parse the APIs, send the emails, schedule the meetings, and generate the code.
In many corners of the tech stack this is probably true. If you’re building some Byzantine system for supply-chain reconciliation or cloud-infrastructure orchestration, it may genuinely be easier to have the machines talk to one another directly.
A small parliament of algorithms debating whether a Kubernetes cluster needs more compute. Passing motions. Filing amendments. Issuing a decree. Fine...let them have their tiny silicon republic.
But the strange thing is how quickly people have started assuming that this logic applies everywhere.
It turns out that not everything in the world is a workflow!
Take education. The central activity of education is not moving information from point A to point B with maximum efficiency. If that were the goal we could simply inject children with PDFs and be done with it.
Education is the slow and painful process of turning one kind of human being into another. It involves boredom, confusion, imitation, rebellion, curiosity, embarrassment, admiration.
You can automate parts of this process—grading, scheduling, administrative sludge. But the core event is human attention directed at another human mind.
Unless we’re ready to hand our children over to autonomous pedagogical machines, engineers will still need to build tools for teachers and students, not just for agents!
English
