
Disenfranchised Human
5.8K posts


@ybtweetz @SuboptimalAGI @SteezyyTommyy @AndriaDont99498 Safety record — For healthy young animals, HQHVSN mortality rates in county shelters are very low (e.g., studies show ~0.009% for dogs in high-volume settings, comparable to or better than some private clinic data)
English

@HypergolicMrs @SuboptimalAGI @SteezyyTommyy @AndriaDont99498 County shelters do low cost because they don't care about the animals as pets and patients, they are simply numbers that don't need to grow more. If a stay dies, so what? If your beloved pet dies, well, you get what you pay for.
English

@SuboptimalAGI @SteezyyTommyy @AndriaDont99498 There are no lab fees/pharmaceutical costs for a standard surgical sterilization. The antibiotics and nsaids used for recovery are cheap. If it were truly that expensive, county animal shelters wouldn’t be charging $50 adoption fees for animals the county paid to sterilize.
English

@SteezyyTommyy @AndriaDont99498 Yall do realize that pharmaceutical costs and lab fees have gone up, just like everything else, right?
English

You can do something about the first: don't get a pet.
You can't do something about the second: make vets lower their prices for you.
You have to deal with the reality of the world, not the dream world you wish existed. An animal is going to be dependent on you...to not have the money to treat it when needed is cruel.
English

@jaderants I respect that. I definitely didn’t enjoy shows with romance when I was little though. Just action/adventure, horror, and Nick at Night classics.
English

@HypergolicMrs i loved romance my entire life especially when i was little
English

well for one, both of these have ROMANCE. and for two, these girls aren’t frumpy, dressed masculine or have ugly character design
SeeingMount Replies@SMReplies
Have executives gotten over the little girls don't like action cartoons thing yet
English

No reason to be contentious here. It’s a pretty benign topic. Girls can enjoy action shows without romance and without being a tomboy. I thought the OP made a valid point. Girls enjoy action/adventure shows too, and it’s cool to see more shows portraying girls as heroes instead of always the damsel in distress.
English

Life360 is an essential when you have a family, especially teenagers. The only time I stalk my husband’s location is when he’s on his way home so I can time dinner to be hot and ready when he gets home. The rest is just notifications that let me know they get to their destinations safely. A trusted/trusting partner wouldn’t need to keep their location private from their SO.
English

@HazelAppleyard I agree with her. You are a sus POS is what it sounds like to me. My girl asked for us both to share our location mutually and I agreed without hesitation. We have our locations on snap and on life360 so we know when we both get to work ECT.
English

That’s wife treatment, not girlfriend treatment. My husband, teenage son, and I share location at all times. Husband wants to know my location because I’m disabled and he worries about me when I have to leave the house. It lets me know he got to work safely. When I know where he’s gone for lunch, I know what not to make for dinner. When he leaves work, I know when to start cooking. When my son leaves, I know where he is, know if he’s driving safely, and get notifications if there’s a collision.
If there’s not a ring on the finger, she has to accept no for an answer. He also has to accept that’ll probably undermine her trust.
English

@AgognonJosue @SMReplies Miraculous isn’t for adult men.
English

@Treshy__xo @itsnwts A month of no contact? Nah, move on. That just sounds pathetic.
English

@Poeslawisalive @itsnwts What about your 2nd, 3rd, or 4th date?
English

@itsnwts I met my current wife on a Saturday. Didn’t text her until the following Friday.
English

@itsnwts After 5 days, if he’s not dealing with some family or life crisis, he’s not into you.
English

@sukufshs @donald_mcgeeber @Niseimonomango @soigomaa The screenshot context is absolutely true. Untreated thyroid dysfunction causes all the listed symptoms and then some.
English

This might be controversial but why can the transgender community safely take high doses of estrogen or testosterone, but a menopausal woman is told no because it causes cancer, heart attacks or stroke?
Chaos@kizzriee
Hot take:
English

@Hamids_Crypto @ianmiles You deserve to be castrated with a butter knife, followed by violently heinous activity as barbaric as your thinking.
English

@ianmiles then why your under teens are ready to be suckedxxx are thy babies thy don't have mind ?
English

@loonlake55 @Reebs73488130 Still true. When mine complained about boredom, I told them to clean the litter box. I haven’t heard the words “I’m bored” since.
English

Too many young people are resenting Boomers, claiming that Boomers had it " easy " financially in their youth. Here are a few fun facts about growing up Boomer.
1. Almost everyone grew up with one bathroom. Mom, Dad and all 3-6 siblings.
2. If you did get to take a vacation, you drove. With no air conditioning. No cup holders. No iPads. Just black vinyl seats and bologna sandwiches.
3. There were no club sports. No Parks and Rec activities. Summer camp was for rich kids. Get yourself a bike, a stick and a few friends. If you were bored, you laid in the grass and looked at clouds.
4. You ate what was served. Even if it was chicken livers. No DoorDash, no backup Totino's rolls.
5. No AP classes, no PSEO, no "fun" elective. They assigned you to a class. You went. You did what they asked. Or else.
6. Unless you had rich parents, you had a nice VFW wedding. Maybe rent a room at a modest hotel.
7. Most Boomers got their first pedi and mani in their 50s (when their feet got farther away). We didn't even know people got massages in real life, only in Hollywood.
8. You packed your own lunch for decades.
9. No one knew what red light therapy was, a facial, a spa day, or a cold plunge. Your gym was the YMCA. Usually in a rather old building.
10. We grew up with 18 percent inflation, 14 percent mortgage rates, 3 million continuing unemployment claims, and 200 other applicants competing for the same job.
Now, this is not to say Millenials and Gen Z have it easy or don't face problems. It's just to say, nobody has it easy or doesn't face problems.
My only hope, as my mom would say, is I live long enough to see my kids' kids complain about how easy they had it!
English

@Questergirl @LolOut160461 @AAGDhillon The Constitution is absolutely not a living document. The framers explicitly stated it’s intended to be interpreted according to its fixed meaning at the time of adoption and the people’s understanding of each amendment at the time it was ratified. Period.
English

@HypergolicMrs @LolOut160461 @AAGDhillon That was a 160 years ago. Things have changed since then. Life is very different in the country now, and a new Supreme Court will decide based on that. The Constitution is a living document, not etched in stone.
English

There’s literally a chair set up at SCOTUS for our presidents to sit in for oral argument. Your separation of powers nonsense is more imitation pearl-clutching hauteur.
Kathryn Watson@kathrynw5
If President Trump attends the Supreme Court's oral arguments tomorrow on his birthright citizenship executive order like he says he will, he would be the first sitting president on record to do so. Presidents have avoided attendance in part to honor the separation of powers.
English

@Questergirl @LolOut160461 @AAGDhillon The conversation wasn’t about whether or not he’d win. Never was. I didn’t, and don’t know whether or not he’ll when. I do know, the author of the birthright citizenship amendment said this.

English

@HypergolicMrs @LolOut160461 @AAGDhillon I was showing you just how badly it went for Trump. They don't need journalists there, the oral arguments are broadcast while they happen so that we know exactly what happened. Sauer is a waste of time lawyer, and Trump is not going to win this.
English

If there’s no journalist there, and no cameras allowed in the courtroom, how can they report that Trump “stormed out”. The journalists that were there reported nothing of the sort. You stick with your hyper partisan, many times discredited sources. I’ll finish listening to, and reading the transcript of the oral argument to form my open opinion instead of relying on media to tell me what my opinion should be.
English

Ineffective pivot from the actual discussion at hand. Hyper partisan sources like Daily Beast and Occupy Democrats go right in the trash. They had no journalists present. The journalists that were present said no such thing. Listen to the oral argument, read the transcript, or go somewhere else.
Just listened to the oral argument, along with reading the transcript.
The “draw dropping” exchange isn’t draw dropping at all. Sauer essentially says under the Administrations test, yes, they are citizens. Under historical congressional debates they were not. Gorsuch repeatedly interrupted Sauer (which is totally fine), but that’s why the transcript looks wonky.
But again, the conversation was never about the context of the oral argument itself. It was about Trump’s presence, which played out as a non-issue.

English


I read it. It’s just garbage in, garbage out AI if you actually look into the non-existent history of it.
Sure, it’s unprecedented, but so what. Try to find any reference to this unwritten rule with any mention of perceived judicial interference or influence cited by any public official, or anyone at all prior to Oct of last year. You can’t, because it doesn’t exist. It’s just a recently created media driven narrative.
One could also assume that presidents haven’t historically attended because when Washington went to the newly formed SCOTUS for constitutional clarification/advice his request was rejected, and so were other requests from early presidents, and presidents didn’t bother with SCOTUS after that precedent was set. We could also assume past presidents haven’t attended due to busy schedules, non-vested interest in SCOTUS hearings because they can blame SCOTUS for negative political outcomes and their hands are clean. We could assume plenty of things.
It makes no sense that any public person can attend SCOTUS hearings on a first come, first serve basis except the President. By that logic, legislators should be held to the same standard, but they aren’t.
His presence created no security or logistical issues. His presence did not disrupt the proceeding at all, so that argument is already out the window. The Justices didn’t even acknowledge his presence in the room.
Justices are hand selected, thoroughly vetted, and should be free of influence from everyone and everything except the Constitution and court precedent. You can determine that yourself by reading their past opinions. If they have bias that doesn’t align with the Constitution, you can blame the president that nominated a bad judge and the senate that confirmed them.
There is no legitimate separation of powers issue here, because the president never performed the duty of a judicial. Even if he did have some kind of vague influence simply by being present, that’s not illegal and doesn’t violate Separation of powers.
He silently attended to hear his team’s argument on a case that he, and many Americans find important, then left. He didn’t even stay to listen to the opposing argument. Big whoop. It was all above board. Sorry you don’t like it.
English












