Jerome.M.Besson

@UFDCP1912 3/6 - 1945年10月25日的受降仪式是一项军事仪式，涉及驻扎在日治台湾的日军向盟军投降，并成立盟军日属台澎占领区的军事政府。安藤利吉将军无权转移台澎的主权。结束日治台湾时期的唯一有效文件是1951年9月8日签订的《旧金山和约》，日本据此宣布放弃台湾及澎湖。

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters In keeping with Truman’s June 27, 1950 declaration on the situation on the Korean Peninsula and on the neutralization of the Taiwan Strait, the US has the sovereignty of Taiwan in trust since 1952. The US is keeping tabs on both Chinese and “zaitais” (在台) Chinese.

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Still, it is the common position adopted by all n sundry for 50 years before the separatist DPP started a new narrative in order to secede Taiwan from China but it hasn’t succeeded yet. Separatist DPP will be the first to be clobbered, assuming it still retain power after 2028

Taiwan opposition leader Cheng Li-wun leaves on April 7 for China and a potential meeting with President Xi Jinping on what she says is a peace mission as Beijing makes a renewed push to convince Taiwanese to support ‘reunification’ reut.rs/4cpknC6

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The common position adopted by KMT, CPC, UN and 193 countries leads to a dead end. It has a blind spot in its rear-view mirror, SFPT article 2(b) crafted by John F. Dulles for the US. Ignoring SFPT has its drawback. China is sure to be clobbered with it when pushes come to shoves

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The 1945 Japanese instrument of surrender did retrocede Taiwan n other stolen territories to China. SFPT did not override the 1945 treaty, which is why the KMT, UN and 193 countries reject DPP’s post-1990 secession narrative. That explains the context of the 1972 US Communique.

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The common position adopted by KMT, CPC, UN and 193 countries leads to a dead end. It has a blind spot in its rear-view mirror, SFPT article 2(b) crafted by John F. Dulles for the US. Ignoring SFPT has its drawback. China is sure to be clobbered with it when pushes come to shoves

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The common position adopted by KMT, CPC, UN and 193 countries is based on the 1945 Japanese instrument of surrender which retroceded Taiwan n all other stolen territories to China. SFPT did not override the 1945 treaty. That also explains the context of the 1972 US-PRC Communique

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters 2/2 - Japan formally gave up its claims in 1952, but no cession to the ROC (or later the PRC) appears in the SFPT. A separate 1952 Treaty of Taipei (between Japan and the ROC) simply acknowledged the renunciation without transferring sovereignty.

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The 1945 Japanese instrument of surrender retroceded Taiwan n all other stolen territories to China. SFPT did not override the 1945 treaty, which is why the KMT, UN and 193 countries reject DPP’s post-1990 secession narrative. That explains the context of the 1972 US Communique.

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters 1/2 - CKS accepted the Japanese surrender in Taiwan on behalf of the Allies and began military occupation. Under international law principles of belligerent occupation, military occupation does not transfer sovereignty. The 1945 handover initiated occupation, not a formal cession

@QuantStyle2 @LamLaw1969 @Reuters 蠢货, that’s a lie and you know it. That is why you are reposting that crap. Any UN pronouncement on Taiwan is worth zilch if it is not guided by the September 8, 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty available from the UN archives. Article 2 (b) failed to cede Taiwan to any China.

@JeromeMBesson @LamLaw1969 @Reuters The reality to understand. Taiwan is part of China. It is not recognized as a country by the international community, which is why there is no embassy of Taiwan in the US and elsewhere. 🇺🇳 UN: Taiwan is a province of China.

@QuantStyle2 @LamLaw1969 @Reuters Ignoring the repercussions of SFPT article 2(b) on the post-WWII Taiwan status causes the blind spot that allows you to hog the conversation thread, claiming “Taiwan is part of China”. @grok What's the real deal with UNGA Resolution 2758 ? Check this thread.

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters The background to understand 《美對鄭訪陸成果好奇》马关条约 ---> 旧金山和平条约 ---> 联合国大会第2758号决议不涉台湾 ---> 台湾关系法 = 中国人民和自错视为「在台🇹🇼人民」的2333万台湾居民，都无法享受台湾的主权。这是美国对二战后台湾的铁则。美国说了算。

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Right back atcha!

@Reuters 2/2 - 马关条约 ---> 旧金山和平条约 ---> 联合国大会第2758号决议不涉台湾 ---> 台湾关系法 = 中国人民和自错视为「在台🇹🇼人民」的2333万台湾居民，都无法享受台湾的主权。这是美国对二战后台湾的铁则。美国说了算。

@Reuters 1/2 - 美国在台协会去年九月发表声明称，三份战时文件，即《开罗新闻稿》、《波茨坦最后通牒》和《旧金山和约》，均未能解决台湾悬而未决的政治地位问题。

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Petit insolent！哇！les coups de pieds au cul qui se perdent, 啊呀！我的妈呀！

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Right back atcha!

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Useful 蠢貨，別鬧啦！That’s horse manure hitting the fan. 1945 treaty?! Go wash, filthy Chinese 傻屌!

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters Repeating a lie a thousand times doesn’t make it real. The 1945 Japanese instrument of surrender retroceded Taiwan n all other stolen territories to China. SFPT did not override the 1945 treaty, which is why the KMT, UN and 193 countries reject DPP’s post-1990 secession narrative

@LamLaw1969 @QuantStyle2 @Reuters 蠢货! You are not literate enough in the English language to understand what that sentence means. And ignoring the San Francisco Peace Treaty article 2 (b) does not help you see the light, Japan-hating Chinese shǎdiǎos (傻屌, dickheads) and shǎbīs (傻屄, cunts) that you all are。

@JeromeMBesson @QuantStyle2 @Reuters US’ 1972 position: “The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position.” “does not challenge that position”

@QuantStyle2 @Reuters 蠢货, that’s a lie and you know it. That is why you are reposting that crap. Any UN pronouncement on Taiwan is worth zilch if it is not guided by the September 8, 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty available from the UN archives. Article 2 (b) failed to cede Taiwan to any China.

@Reuters 🇺🇳 UN General Assembly Resolution of 1971: Taiwan is a province of China.

@PureSignalX @Reuters Useful 蠢货

@Reuters A peace mission that could redefine the island's political landscape for a generation.

@AhmadDono7 @Reuters On Xi’s terms！ Read the fine print, 蠢货！！

@Reuters Wrong, Zheng liwen even never mention reunification, she just want peace, maintain status quo, only want receive free lunch from China.

@Reuters As I commented repeatedly since her nomination, Cheng Li-wen, that “zaitai” (在台) Chinese shǎbī (傻屄, cunt) is busy, digging the mass-grave of the Chinese KMT on Taiwan.

@CCrowley100 Iryna Zarutska, the lamb sacrificed to save us from the abyss of cowardice. Let us repent and rise up!

Never forget. Never forgive. Look back with anger. Steel your hearts for what comes next. We will take our nations back.

@MProphil @ObsDelphi Vas te faire mettre, shǎbī (傻屄, cunt)!

@ObsDelphi Larmes de crocodile. Peux tu écrire juste les atrocités commises au nom de la France en Afrique par le gouvernement français depuis des décennies? Honte à toi hypocrites. Le cas de Thomas Sankara et d'autres.

🇫🇷🇨🇳Il faut que l'on se débarrasse de notre naïveté à propos de la Chine. Malgré les efforts diplomatiques, ils ont quand même exécuté un ressortissant français sans aucun scrupule. Nous avons peur de les vexer sur Taïwan, eux s'en contrefoutent de notre réaction lorsqu'ils tuent un de nos ressortissants. Il est peut-être nécessaire de rappeler que la Chine est une dictature communiste néo-totalitaire qui entend régner par la force seule. Chaque jour, leur comportement sur leur propre territoire mais également dans toute l'Asie démontre qu'ils sont à l'exact opposé de toutes nos valeurs humanistes. Ils ne veulent qu'une seule chose : obtenir une puissance hégémonique telle qu'ils pourront écraser tous leurs voisins, et au-delà. La Chine dépense ÉNORMÉMENT pour dans son discours de propagande en France en se faisant passer pour le contraire des États-Unis. C'est-à-dire un État qui ne colonise pas, qui ne fait pas la guerre et qui ne souhaite que la paix. Or, c'est absolument faux et il n'y a qu'à regarder ce qu'ils font en Asie pour s'en apercevoir. Génocide des Ouïghours, annexion et oppression du Tibet, répression sanglante à coups de trique de Hong-Kong, menace d'invasion constante et grandissante de Taïwan... La Chine doit être perçue pour ce qu'elle fait, pas pour ce qu'elle dit. Aujourd'hui, elle exécute un ressortissant français malgré la sonnette d'alarme de Paris. Cela devrait nous pousser à sérieusement revoir notre rapport à Pékin.

@ObsDelphi Condamné en 2010 et conservé pour une grande occasion. Lors de la visite de Macron au Japon et en Corée, la réaffirmation que la France est une puissance de l’Indo-Pacifique et donc membre de la coalition qui se dresse contre Beijing a offert le prétexte. x.com/KimKatieUSA/st…