Joseph

29.5K posts

Joseph

Joseph

@JosephOnions

mission to civilize. learning. CFP. CPA.

Amherst, NY Beigetreten Haziran 2012
845 Folgt361 Follower
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@adammarkowitzEA @TKocher33 My man, we all need a breather at this point in tax season. You're not making sense here, which could definitely be my bad. Wishing you and yours a happy Easter/Passover.
English
0
0
1
16
Adam Markowitz, EA, CSLP
Adam Markowitz, EA, CSLP@adammarkowitzEA·
Just the most jackass MFS that I've had to do. Couple lives in TX. They have about $600k in AGI, so they're capped at $10k in SALT MFJ. Their SALT is about $20k. By filing separately, they each get the full $10k in SALT. Man, OBBBA was written like crap. #TaxTwitter
English
9
1
40
7.1K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@0xcryptotax You go too far. These guys are selling their own AI thing, that's it.
English
0
0
0
37
Cameron 🧉 (tax/acc)
Cameron 🧉 (tax/acc)@0xcryptotax·
Lol, so many things to dive in on this one. I love tax season CPA crash outs. - If you have such a "solid understanding of tax law", then why are you relying upon an LLM and Turbotax consults to do your taxes? - Said LLMs are known to point to outdated data. Ya know, given that OB3 just passed few months ago and most models didn't incorporate. Yes, it may incorporate the bones of the IRC but case law and key legislation is an after thought. - How can you definitely say your taxes are correct when you yourself lack the judgement and expertise to do so? Similarly, how can you can you steelman your own tax position when the LLM is just predicting your next thought? Good riddance on both accounts. Good CPAs and accountants don't want clients like you and there's shite accountants running 1040 mills that deserve to get replaced by basal AI.
Santiago@svpino

The first time I used a CPA, he was extremely efficient and extremely wrong. It was a large company. They took care of everything for me. I felt amazing. Years later, I understood what a crappy job they did: They did almost nothing to help me save money. As my taxes became more complex, I started trusting CPA and tax preparer experts less and less. I quickly realized that they provide very good service for the 95% of people out there, but as soon as your situation becomes more complex, their services are less valuable. Right now, I'm too rich for the CPA I can afford, and too poor for the CPA I need. This year, I filled out my taxes using a combination of Claude (for the most part) and ChatGPT. For reference, I have a solid understanding of tax law, and I've always been involved in my taxes. I'm also not uneducated. I used TurboTax's consulting service to ask complex questions beyond my knowledge and to fact-check Claude's suggestions. Most of the time, the human experts were clueless and didn't know that something we did was even possible or lawful. Most experts had to ask me "to return my call later" so they had time to read more about the topic. Claude was right every single time. This was eye-opening for me. By the way, I also found a mistake in my 2024 return. Claude found out that I wasn't reporting a backdoor Roth IRA contribution correctly. I had to file an amended return for 2024, and the IRS owes me $2,562. To all the people saying this is just bro science and that you should trust your CPA, I say: Have fun with it. Instead: • Claude did 99.9% of the work with my help • I used human experts to validate some of that work • I paid the TurboTax Audit Defense service to have them represent me in the event of an audit I know this might be fringe today, but more and more people will start moving this way. CPAs will have to compete now to win our business back.

English
8
1
48
11.5K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@adammarkowitzEA @TKocher33 What am I missing? $250K+ starts 30% phase out, cap starts at $20K. $300K MFS is $50K over threshold, at 30% is $15K, which reduces cap to $5K each...which is the floor, and same as $10K filing jointly. Or I'm wrong.
English
1
0
1
65
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@jaytedder @Wvv_70 @jmt5050 @KurtSchlichter Yes, I'm certain the unprincipled Trump loyalists Alito & Thomas will agree with you. But no one else will. In what way does it mean under the jurisdiction?
English
1
0
0
16
Jay Tedder
Jay Tedder@jaytedder·
@JosephOnions @Wvv_70 @jmt5050 @KurtSchlichter If the parents owe loyalty to another country, meaning they are citizens of another country, they are not under the jurisdiction of the US. They are just visiting. Yes, they must obey our laws while here, but they are not under our jurisdiction the way the amendment means.
English
2
0
0
20
Kurt Schlichter
Kurt Schlichter@KurtSchlichter·
You guys understand we’re going to lose the birthright citizenship case, right? Before you completely freak out, the traditional understanding of the 14th Amendment, which we are seeking to change, is not an insane reading of it. Nor are our arguments insane like the left has been same. That’s baloney to just shut us up. Neither side is frivolous. It’s a tough call legally and objectively speaking. But when we lose it, and I think we will, don’t freak out that this is some sort of conspiracy. It’s a hard legal decision. Sadly, we have three judges who aren’t even going to try to examine the question and will always vote for what leftists want. But the rest of the court has to make a tough legal call. I think our reading is the correct one. For various reasons, I think they’re going to rule against us. Don’t freak out when they do. It’s not an utterly irrational ruling like so many of the district court opinions we’ve seen.
English
1.4K
400
3.8K
1.2M
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@jaytedder @Wvv_70 @jmt5050 @KurtSchlichter It's a bad rule, but it says what it says. It's wild that so-called conservatives have now forgetten that words have meaning. Scalia is rolling in his grave.
English
1
0
0
18
Jay Tedder
Jay Tedder@jaytedder·
@JosephOnions @Wvv_70 @jmt5050 @KurtSchlichter Is there another country where they can vote and be drafted into their military? If you go to Japan, you are subject to their laws. You cannot vote in their elections. If you have a baby there, it will not be a Japanese citizen. This isn't that hard.
English
1
0
0
18
Andrew
Andrew@andr3w31a561·
In 2026, saying you’re going to bomb a country of 90 million people and one of the oldest civilizations in the world “back to the stone age, where they belong” is truly fucking vile.
English
874
4.7K
33.6K
365.8K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@jaytedder @Wvv_70 @jmt5050 @KurtSchlichter Those are two out of the ordinary examples. Are they subject to every other law? Required to pay taxes? It's a bad outcome, but every conservative should be calling for clear reading of the text.
English
1
0
0
16
Paco
Paco@pacopaquero·
@JosephOnions @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb Sometimes they do. But not always. And not in Iran. And the only reason they do notices is because of international public opinion. Given how radical they are now, if we didn't have the internet, they would do the same thing they did at Deir Yassin or Tantura in April 1948.
English
1
0
0
24
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@Martina @strxwmxn You might consider why the good people of Lebanon are so supportive of Israel's action here?
English
0
0
0
27
Martina Navratilova
@strxwmxn Southern part of Lebanon cannot be a buffer zone. Just how big a zone does one need? Those drones can hit from anywhere…as we are seeing now. Bombing civilian houses is surely not a solution
English
133
4
17
71.4K
Martina Navratilova
Hmm. Just for the record- I am not anti Israel or anti anything Jewish. I call out criminal behavior , regardless of who is doing it. And these days Bibi is very busy doing criminal stuff
Furkan Gözükara@FurkanGozukara

Absolute bombshell. Benjamin Netanyahu openly admits to illegally occupying and annexing sovereign territory in Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon to create permanent buffer zones. He is literally confessing to violent imperial expansionism on camera.

English
421
1.4K
4.7K
83.9K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@pacopaquero @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb I don't find it merciful at all, it's extremely brutal. I'm trying to get you to make the honest statement, a truth you seem unable to agree to: IDF did or did not give advance notice so civilians wouldn't get killed when their homes were bombed?
English
1
0
0
39
Paco
Paco@pacopaquero·
@JosephOnions @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb If you destroy my home and my future, am I supposed to thank you for not killing me before taking my land? I hope you never have to experience that. I'm sure you wouldn't find it so merciful if you lived through it yourself.
English
1
0
0
19
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@pacopaquero @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb This is great progress, and a fair question you ask. Do we agree that IDF intentionally avoided killing civilians by giving advance notice before bombing neighborhoods?
English
1
0
0
32
Paco
Paco@pacopaquero·
@JosephOnions @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb You're missing the point. So if you inform people (including those "terrorists" you're confronting), and then destroy their homes is not a big crime according to you? What's the purpose? You didn't kill your enemy, and have destroyed the future for hundred of innocent people.
English
1
0
0
15
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@pacopaquero @MonkeyPresson @nntaleb You're conflating property with civilian lives, on purpose. Before neighborhoods were destroyed, IDF informed the people living there that they'd be bombing. If IDF intended to kill civilians indiscriminately, why the advance evacuation notices?
English
1
0
0
20
Paco
Paco@pacopaquero·
@MonkeyPresson @nntaleb Yes, erasing entire neighborhoods and leaving millions of people without a home to return to is caring a lot about civilians.
English
1
0
0
31
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@tolstoybb 0 regard for 45,000 Iranian people murdered by their government a few months ago? Any thought as to what they may have done with a nuclear weapon? Thankfully the most incompetent and unethical administration in our history is much more competent and ethical than you are.
English
1
0
0
176
Rachel
Rachel@tolstoybb·
There’s literally no other reason to fight this war other than for Israel
English
50
100
1.9K
136.4K
Daniel Vassallo
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo·
Just did a dry run of my 2024 taxes with both Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.4, providing the same docs and info I had given my accountant last year. Opus missed a few things, and thought I had underpaid by $25K. GPT matched exactly what the accountant produced, and even found an error!
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo

Update: My accountant is gonna be @openclaw instead, using TurboTax for tax filing. It’s already been 10X more helpful than my previous accountant.

English
26
4
240
66K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@NrsngHomePndmic @ilan_wurman You're holding Coleman to an evidence-based analysis. But Joe Kent openly speculates that maybe Israel actually did try to kill Trump, with no evidence at all. If only the former is a concern and the latter isn't, your brain is broken (as you'll reveal further in reply).
English
0
0
0
10
TimmyGee
TimmyGee@NrsngHomePndmic·
“Insinuation is 100 percent’ is not an evidence based analysis. Joe Kent says at least three times in the interview with Tucker that he doesn’t blame Israel and that he has no proof that it is Israel. What he DOES say is as the Director of National Counterterrorism he was not able to follow leads he thought he should be able to follow. Coleman in response; “What I'm saying is anyone who says something as insanely illogical as Israel tried to get Trump killed, clearly there is something going on, making that person irrational, right?”…..”“I'll double check it and if I'm wrong, I'll cut it out.” I dont think Coleman is ‘“an evidence-based person”, I think he is a scumbag with an agenda.
English
1
0
0
142
Ilan Wurman
Ilan Wurman@ilan_wurman·
Watch this episode. The whole two hours. Every minute is worth it. Coleman was excellent. He was very respectful, focused on data and argument, and didn’t resort to accusations of anti-semitism. The more he pushed Glenn, the more Glenn moderated and nuanced his positions in ways he rarely does when it’s a rah-rah interview with those who already agree with him. And Coleman was excellent at demonstrating that whenever Glenn thinks “Israel” or the “Israel lobby” is behind something, there is almost always a more simple and parsimonious explanation. Glenn also represented his views well and respectfully. They both modelled civil discourse at its best. Bravo.
Coleman Hughes@coldxman

A while back, I agreed to debate John Mearsheimer on the Israel Lobby. John dropped out for mysterious reasons and @ggreenwald took his place. Ultimately, the festival got canceled, so I decided to invite Glenn on my podcast to (respectfully) duke it out. youtube.com/watch?v=AEvJQo…

English
6
21
382
50.5K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@Gordon91918009 @thackerpd You wrote earlier that the one thing that broke your trust in the public health establishment was the statement about the vaccine's 95% effectiveness. But that 95% effectiveness was true, wasn't it?
English
0
0
0
3
Curaçao Fanatic 🇨🇼 🇭🇹 🇵🇸
@JosephOnions @thackerpd I understand your point, Joseph. My take is a little different: Two shots, a month apart, was an abominable idea, especially for young men. This will never be done again ,as everyone knows this injured people's hearts. The other result was 2-4 months of pretty good immunity......
English
1
0
0
17
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@KweenInYellow @sawaya_nicolas I mean, you just got caught in a lie didn't you? Off by an order or magnitude. Maybe correct yourself before you go on sympathizing with terrorists? Are you aware if the good people of Lebanon support this?
English
0
0
0
168
gato fumador
gato fumador@KweenInYellow·
@sawaya_nicolas Oh okay false alarm then I'm sure everything is going to turn out just fine. 👍
English
5
1
407
7.8K
gato fumador
gato fumador@KweenInYellow·
Israel has now seized a larger percentage of Lebanon's total landmass than Russia has taken from Ukraine since its 2022 invasion. The latter was immediately met with international uproar and unprecedented multi-sectoral sanctions while the former is barely even mentioned.
English
359
16K
63.5K
951.6K
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@Gordon91918009 @thackerpd Pretty much everything about the pandemic is disputed, except this one point. The vaccines actually were that effective against the original Wuhan strain & alpha. This changed with delta & omicron - it's very confusing to people who wish to be confused by it.
English
2
0
1
14
Curaçao Fanatic 🇨🇼 🇭🇹 🇵🇸
@JosephOnions @thackerpd Right Joe! Of course! But all of the subsequent boosters tailored to protect against the later variants also carried studies showing how well they worked. All of the boosted people also caught all those variants! You sold the mandates on the basis that vax would stop transmission
English
1
0
0
11
Joseph
Joseph@JosephOnions·
@Gordon91918009 @thackerpd There were so many lies, but this was the one clear truth - strange to point to this. The vaccine was that good and effective against the then-prevailing strain, and so many people (like you, but also scientists) failed to understand or predict viral mutation.
English
1
0
0
12