KantHumerMe

206 posts

KantHumerMe banner
KantHumerMe

KantHumerMe

@KantHumorMe

Edinburgh, Scotland Beigetreten Haziran 2020
1.1K Folgt67 Follower
KantHumerMe
KantHumerMe@KantHumorMe·
@HabCorpLinguist How do you read “jurisdiction” and avoid making the birth requirement superfluous?
English
1
0
0
21
Habeas Corpus Linguistics
Habeas Corpus Linguistics@HabCorpLinguist·
Basically the argument. They’re twisting themselves in knots.
✝️🇺🇸 The Intern 🌐🔆@EiratheIntern

@TheANRP Jurisdiction means allegiance and allegiance means domicile but not illegal domiciles but including illegal slaves for some reason, and based off the parent, not the child, even though the amendment makes no mention of the parent, upholding common law, but not Jus Soli absolutely

English
1
0
1
399
Eric W.
Eric W.@EWess92·
Another high profile law professor weighs in on the side of text, history, and tradition for understanding the upcoming Birthright Citizenship case. @RobLutherLawyer writes that the Original understanding of the citizenship clause tracks President Trump's Executive Order
Eric W. tweet media
English
22
19
83
135.2K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
Read the draft carefully. Now re-read it even more carefully. Read it again. Now submit. Now reveal a typo in the first sentence.
Neil Renic tweet media
English
24
637
13.3K
134.6K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Rep. Riley M. Moore
Rep. Riley M. Moore@RepRileyMoore·
I’m the #1 ranked skateboarder in Congress.
English
119
98
1.1K
148.9K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Mike Bird
Mike Bird@Birdyword·
Hoping that the Epstein emails finally kill the all-lowercase writing trend. Might start calling it Little Saint James style.
English
13
40
998
40.3K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Jeremy Christiansen
Jeremy Christiansen@TradVat2·
Doctors can assert the standing of patients seeking abortion, but parents lack standing to protect their own children from being secretly transitioned. The absolute state of standing doctrine.
America First Legal@America1stLegal

/1🚨NEW — AFL has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court in its ongoing case against the state of Washington on behalf of concerned parents and advocacy organizations.

English
2
19
170
9.4K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Covfefe Anon
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon·
Great look into the progressive mind If you want to render a glass sphere, you have to model the entire world and this tweet is a rendered glass sphere His reaction to the exposure of massive fraud is murderous anger at anyone exposing it This anger is expressed via progressive passive voice - "someone will just happen to kill anyone exposing these people and that's not an *action* - that's like weather - out of human hands and there's no moral valence to it" Finally, it throws in a multipart "misunderstanding" of "stand your ground" laws - they don't exist in Minnesota, they're about people actually being attacked and not people objecting to criminal activity being filmed but in the progressive world-view "stand your ground laws" have nothing to do with actual "stand your ground" laws - they're a totem because progressives want to delegitimize the entire concept of self-defense (while making violent crime against you legal) This person is a "Senior Legal Affairs Reporter" at a "credible" media institution
Covfefe Anon tweet mediaCovfefe Anon tweet mediaCovfefe Anon tweet media
Josh Gerstein@joshgerstein

At some point, the amateur effort to knock on doors of home daycares intersects with robust stand-your-ground laws

English
71
356
2.3K
91.3K
Ari Hoffman
Ari Hoffman@thehoffather·
Why were child and adult care centers in Minnesota maxing out donations to a Somali candidate in Washington?
Ari Hoffman tweet mediaAri Hoffman tweet media
English
879
7.4K
35.3K
5.9M
KantHumerMe retweetet
Greg Price
Greg Price@greg_price11·
Fascinating video from @nickshirleyy in which he goes around to Somali businesses receiving taxpayer dollars to see if they are legitimate businesses. Spoiler: most of them are not. youtube.com/watch?v=r8AulC…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
51
441
2.3K
172.7K
KantHumerMe retweetet
NASA Ames
NASA Ames@NASAAmes·
O Christmas tree, o cosmic tree 🎄 Located about 2,500 light-years from Earth, NGC 2264 is a cluster of young stars between one and five million years old. The stars appear as blue and white lights surrounded by swirls of gas—the “pine needles” of the tree—with green representing light in the visible spectrum. Learn more:go.nasa.gov/3MN1xdX
NASA Ames tweet media
English
546
21.4K
67.6K
2.3M
KantHumerMe retweetet
Jarvis
Jarvis@jarvis_best·
Entering my Yukon Cornelius era.
Jarvis tweet media
Eesti
53
29
560
12.8K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Rob Luther
Rob Luther@RobLutherLawyer·
Just after @realDonaldTrump was re-elected, three Democrat-appointed federal judges—James Wynn, Algernon Marbley, and Max Cogburn—withdraw their retirement letters to President Biden. This was unprecedented, so @Article3Project and @mrddmia filed judicial misconduct complaints against them. This week, the Second Circuit Judicial Council finally publicly released their decision that no misconduct was committed. Chief Judge Livingston’s decision is unpersuasive. She basically concludes that because the judges didn’t come out and say they withdrew their letters because Trump won, they didn’t violate the Canons. But the appearance of impropriety relies on reasonable inferences, and the decision doesn’t say that the judges denied pulling their letters because Trump won. Chief Judge Livingston is also wrong to equate a judge’s ability to retire under R or D presidencies with withdrawing one’s retirement—retiring and withdrawing one’s retirement aren’t the same. Also, nice work by the Judiciary to post the decision online right after the 42 day statute of limitations to appeal expired. We aren’t stupid, we all know what happened here. Judges Wynn, Marbley, and Cogburn should have been publicly reprimanded from the Judicial Council for violating Canons 2A, 2B and 5.
Howard Bashman@howappealing

“Judges Who ‘Unretired’ After Trump Win Didn’t Breach Ethics Code”: Suzanne Monyak of Bloomberg Law has this report. You can access the rulings of the Judicial Council of the Second Circuit here, here, and here. #230876" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2025/12/05/#23

English
28
230
719
57.1K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Anna Lulis
Anna Lulis@annamlulis·
A fetus was the first to rejoice at the news of Jesus.
English
128
673
7.5K
310.1K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Trent McCotter
Trent McCotter@TrentMcCotter·
Remember when SCOTUS criticized a TX judge for not ruling on an emergency motion 14.5 HOURS after it was filed (in the middle of the night over a holiday)? SCOTUS has now been sitting for FORTY DAYS on DOJ's emergency application to stay a First Circuit order on a trans issue
Trent McCotter tweet media
English
4
63
235
13K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Raymond Arroyo
Raymond Arroyo@RaymondArroyo·
“Beware of despairing about yourself; you are commanded to put your trust in God, not in yourself.” St. Augustine
Raymond Arroyo tweet media
English
60
975
6.8K
93.4K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Adrian F. Pascal 🇻🇦
Adrian F. Pascal 🇻🇦@deusimpera·
“Lord, do not rebuke me in your anger.” (Psalm 6:1)
English
6
416
4.1K
49.7K
KantHumerMe retweetet
Jeremy Christiansen
Jeremy Christiansen@TradVat2·
Judiciary Reform Act of 2026. A new federal court is hereby created, called the US Federal Court for the Titular District of the United States. All Democrat appointed judges of the lower courts are hereby transfered to the Titular District. The Titular District shall have no subject matter jurisdiction over any Case or Controversy.
English
15
56
282
26.7K