@LoreofRunning

Imagine if there's one treatment to reverse all consequences of hyperinsulinaemia? Well, maybe there is. The Lifestyle Therapy Targeting Hyperinsulinaemia practised by @PeterCummings' team in Buffalo, NY is achieving just that. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…. Better than all medicines

Fought hard until the final whistle and take three points in Belfast. #ULSvSTO #inittogether @Vodacom #URC

Just to put everyone's mind at rest: The Hantavirus PCR test requires a Blood or CerebroSpinal fluid draw, So unless the Wibbles are prepared to be doing spinal taps at home there is no Scamdemic happening with this one.

As is the same with every other set of PCR test reagents, Hantavirus PCR test kits comes with the legal disclaimer they are not for diagnostic or therapeutic use. If the news are telling you someone has been diagnosed positive from a PCR test they are committing fraud.

🍼 Découvrez la 𝙨𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚́𝙜𝙞𝙚 𝙣𝙪𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 millimétrée de Yomif Kejelcha (🇪🇹) à l’occasion de son marathon en 1H59’41 à Londres ! Le plan était simple : survivre 42,195 kilomètres 💪 𝙋𝙤𝙞𝙙𝙨 → 59,5 kilogrammes 𝙏𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙡𝙚 → 1,87 mètres 𝙍𝙚́𝙨𝙚𝙧𝙫𝙚 𝙜𝙡𝙮𝙘𝙤𝙜𝙚̀𝙣𝙚 → 580 grammes 𝘼𝙥𝙥𝙤𝙧𝙩 𝙜𝙡𝙪𝙘𝙞𝙙𝙞𝙦𝙪𝙚 𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚́ → 287 grammes Son plan nutrition à la veille du marathon : 𝟴𝗛𝟬𝟬 → Pain blanc avec miel + banane 🍌 𝟵𝗛𝟯𝟬 → Boisson de récup’ + banane 𝟭𝟭𝗛𝟯𝟬 → Boisson Unusual Nitrous 🍼 𝟭𝟮𝗛𝟬𝟬 → Riz, pomme de terre + poulet rôti 𝟭𝟲𝗛𝟬𝟬 → Pain blanc avec miel 𝟭𝟴𝗛𝟯𝟬 → Boisson Unusual Nitrous 🍼 𝟮𝟬𝗛𝟬𝟬 → Riz, pomme de terre + banane 🍌 Son plan nutrition le jour J du marathon : À lire ici ➡️ run-ix.co/4uze31e. « La marge était minimale et l’objectif était clair : arriver au kilomètre 35 avec les réservoirs aussi pleins que possible pour jouer la victoire ! » Histoire, méthode et 𝙙𝙚́𝙩𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙨 très intéressants 👀

They patented hanta virus vaccine in 2025 and a few months later we have another PLANDEMIC. Moderna have an mRNA ‘vaccine’ ready to go for Hantavirus And the WHO have their Pandemic Treaty ready to be agreed, timing is perfect. Let me think do I want the new Moderna shot? NO

Just so we are clear on this: The claim is that this Rat Piss Virus has A) No Cure and B) a 40% death rate... Unless 40% of these cases die this is absolute proof they are manufacturing this scare with fraudulent PCR tests.

“In Ethiopia, running alone is seen as deeply antisocial in the same way that eating alone is.” A remarkable essay on African v American training philosophies. aeon.co/essays/what-et…

Essentially, 2-3 people may have unfortunately died from a virus that has been around probably at least as long as humans. The news story is that it was made into an international news story. Yesterday, about 4000 people died of TB, and 2000 children died of malaria. The same news services missed it.

The GOAT of Sports Nutrition @LouiseMaryBurke is back to share all her favourite things - cutting edge research, applied sport science, chocolate, and occasionally the St Kilda Saints. Give her new account a follow

Anders Sørensen, a Danish clinical psychologist and researcher known for his work on psychiatric drug withdrawal and hyperbolic tapering, spoke Monday at the MAHA Institute summit about psychiatric drug dependency and withdrawal. Listen closely to what he says.

If you find yourself getting butt hurt over really long ultras taking shine from shorter ultras, you may want to do some homework on the history of the 6-Day Event. The man who does the deepest of dives into this is named Davy Crockett. zachbitter.com/hpo-episode-420

Dear WHO, Just wanted to check. Is hantavirus a standing up virus or a sitting down virus? And does it only travel in straight lines, or can it also go round corners? And does it follow the arrows on one-way systems, or can it change direction? And is it a metric virus, requiring 2 metres separation, or an imperial one, requiring only 6 feet separation? And is it more deadly in Scotland than England, requiring different precautions beyond 55 degrees North? Just trying to figure out what type of countermeasures are needed to stay safe. 👍😷😷😷😷😷😷 Thanks!

It is with a heavy heart that I share the sad news that one of my lab members, Pengli Wang, PhD student in chemical engineering, has passed away on Friday, May 1, at the age of 28, in an unexpected accident. I’ve struggled to write this because it is hard to put into words just how much Pengli meant to our lab, his friends, the Stanford graduate student community, and of course his family. From my own limited perspective, Pengli was any advisor’s dream student: creative, insightful, courageous, and an extraordinarily gifted experimentalist. He was a true polymath, self-taught in everything from computational protein structural modeling to high-throughput protein engineering to animal behavioral testing. In only 3.5 years in the lab, Pengli had already made an enormous and lasting impact on the field of protein engineering. He has a co-first-author paper in press describing a new method that will transform both empirical and AI-based protein engineering. He also recently submitted a first-author paper on imaging neurotransmitters through enzymatic light emission, enabling us to observe cellular communication in living animals completely noninvasively. I expect this work will lead to new ways of investigating and understanding neurological and metabolic disease. Arthur C. Clarke wrote that “any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Pengli was the best magician, producing eye-opening tricks, each better than the last. The loss of his future contributions is immeasurable, but the technologies he already created will continue to benefit science and medicine for years to come. What truly made Pengli special, though, was his kindness and joy for life. He never hesitated to help others, and he generously mentored many newer lab members, all of whom spoke about what an exceptional teacher he was. He also had an unforgettable spirit — the loudest and funniest laugh in the room, and an ability to eat astonishing amounts of food while somehow remaining skinny. He is deeply missed by everyone who knew him. Pengli, may you rest in peace and in the lasting glow of your accomplishments. You represented the very best of humanity and will forever remain an inspiration to all of us. 💔

Yes because of elevated insulin concentrations.Muscle has no choice but to burn carbs because lipolysis is being inhibited. That doesn’t necessarily make it “good”. Literature does not show that 120g/hr is better than 80g/hr for example, even though carb oxidation is greater.Why?

Your pancreas secretes lipase to digest fat and protease to digest protein. It does not secrete cellulase. You are not a ruminant. You never were.

Same is true for pharma studies

@Marion436842126 2004, 3 stents, attribute to poor life style, prescribed 40mg atorvastatin. That should do the trick. 2013, 1 more stent, now 80mg. 2018, only 5 yrs later, 90% blockage to the widow maker… open heart, still on statin, research led me to stop all meds in 2023…. Mending now

Imagine taking your car to the shop and the mechanic says “you need your battery replaced” and you say, “how do you know that?” and he says “It doesn’t matter because I conducted a randomized controlled trial where replacing the batteries in half the cars on average made them perform better.” This is what “mechanisms don’t matter, outcomes do” should sound like to anyone with common sense. You really need to have common sense driven out of you relentlessly by education in order to arrive at the conclusion that you should entrust your health to someone who thinks how your body works simply doesn’t matter.

Whether they try to scare you with “hantavirus” or any other “virus,” remember the wisdom of ex-virologist Stefan Lanka, who challenged the absurdities within his own field.

A famous food scientist accidentally revealed how a huge amount of modern “research” gets created. And it’s terrifying. This story in a new book by @DavidEpstein titled, “Inside the Box.” amzn.to/4tiwGFy Brian Wansink was one of the biggest nutrition researchers in America. His studies constantly went viral: Bigger bowls make you eat more. Hungry shoppers buy more junk food. Cafeteria fruit placement changes behavior. He advised the USDA. His work shaped public policy. Then he destroyed his own career with a blog post. Not because he confessed fraud. Because he casually described how the research process ACTUALLY worked. One of his studies failed. Nothing interesting showed up. So he handed the data to a grad student and basically said: “Keep digging. There’s gotta be something in there.” So she kept slicing the data different ways until patterns appeared. Suddenly: people who paid less for pizza buffets felt guiltier. Another pattern: the FIRST slice mattered more for expensive buffets. The LAST slice mattered more for cheap buffets. Headline-worthy stuff. The problem? Those weren’t discoveries. They were accidents. If you search enough data long enough, random patterns ALWAYS appear. That’s the scary part. The researchers often weren’t lying. They genuinely convinced themselves the patterns were meaningful. David Epstein gives the perfect analogy: It’s like firing bullets randomly at a wall… Then drawing the bullseye afterward. After Wansink’s blog post, scientists started investigating. 18 of his papers were eventually retracted. But the bigger story is worse. When researchers were finally forced to publicly state their hypotheses BEFORE experiments… The number of successful medical breakthroughs suddenly collapsed. Not because medicine stopped working. Because science got stricter. For years, researchers had too much freedom to reinterpret results afterward. That line stopped me cold. A lot of “insight” is just revisionist storytelling after the fact. This extends way beyond science. People do this constantly with: business success investing productivity relationships careers We create explanations AFTER outcomes happen. Then pretend we predicted them all along. Humans hate randomness. So we manufacture meaning retroactively. That’s what made this section of Epstein’s book so unsettling. The danger isn’t bad intentions. It’s how easy it is for smart people to fool themselves.