Hopeful Democrat

केजरीवाल की सरकार दिल्ली में वापिस आ रही है

THIS IS ABSOLUTE MIC DROP 🔥 BJP: We care for the women of this country. ANMOL 🎯: If you truly cared, where were you when women wrestlers protested for 2 months? “You stood with Prajwal Revanna.” “When widows were paraded naked in Manipur, where was the PM?” “In Pahalgam, families were destroyed. And after Operation Sindoor, you’re playing cricket with Pakistan.” YOU JUST CARE ABOUT POLITICS. 💥

Swar kanta is educated version of Rekh Gupta!

India me AI se ye sab bana rahe hai..🤦‍♂️😂🤣

My own staff, along with his 12 mates have gone back to Bengal, just to vote He is a kattar Hindu and he, along with all his mates have gone their to vote for @MamataOfficial Di! 3 days back he said to me in hindi “Bengal mein Gujarati thekedaro ko ghusne nahi denge”

Just spoke to Mamta didi on phone. Expressed complete solidarity and support. She is fighting one of the most difficult battles, which is also one of the most important battles for Indian democracy. Modi ji will lose, inspite of misusing all institutions including CEC

There is only one E85 compatible car in India and it is owned by Nitin Gadkari. This is how we plan our policies.

@ManojManojkapur @AamAadmiWale @advisory_legal @SauravDassss She hasn't even adopted any proper legal guidelines and concepts while denying to recuse. She just used her position as a judge to bulldoze any opposition that would stop her from serving her true masters - the bjp and RSS.

@advisory_legal @SauravDassss Concrete link even in normal jurisprudence & diligence is not possible that is why the doctrine of perceived bias in the mind of litigant enumerated by past and current incidents is enough to seek recusal. She has gone off tangent using this as allegations on her which is silly

“Justice Sharma said that even if her relatives are empanelled on Government panels, Kejriwal was still required to show the proximity, relevance, and impact of such empanelment on the case in hand or on the decision-making power of the Court.” WRONG. ABSOLUTELY WRONG. How can the burden to “prove” this be put on a litigant? It is practically impossible. And hence the jurisprudence on recusal requires a litigant to not “prove” bias but only properly convey their “reasonable apprehension” of possible bias due to circumstances such as this. Justice Sharma has got it totally wrong here. The higher courts ought to correct this disastrous judgment on recusal.

@TweetinderKaul @ManojManojkapur @AamAadmiWale @SauravDassss I recall.. This man is a thief. This thief is a man. So, all men are thieves. Nobody wants this kind of overarching generalized recusal jurisprudence. Anyways, law too allows to invoke recusal proceedings only when apprehension of bias is present. Let's talk about this case.

@LoudCriticism @ManojManojkapur @AamAadmiWale @SauravDassss Let me assume that she is. The ends won't justify the means because an expanded recusal jurisprudence will be used in all kinds of ways in all kinds of cases.

Stop screaming. The central government is a massive entity. She passes orders for and against them every single day. You cannot infer bias simply on this basis. So she is right. Despite your use of caps lock. Krishna Iyer used to be a minister in the Kerala govt but you'd probably brown nose his corpse.

Thanks to @whattalawyer got to know there are numerous Judges with integrity who sought transfer after their Son or Daughter started practising in same court. They could have brazened it out but they chose not to

This is not the first. They have already blended 100% RSS in govt before

Justice Sujoy Paul, Justice Atul Sreedharan, Justice V Sivaraman Nair and others. Legal portals should write an article and ask these judges why they sought transfer when their children started practising in the same High Court.

@PranavaBhardwaj Whatever concern the judge has, he recused voluntarily. But madam has instigated her master's entire troll army to defend her verdict even after she legally judged herself as innocent, just and impartial. What a cartoon!!!

Any pressure to initiate contempt.?

@ManojManojkapur @AamAadmiWale @TweetinderKaul @SauravDassss If you know the unlimited power and influence of RSS in the current govt, I guess that normilzes her statement - whenever I attend an RSS function, I get promoted. IMHO, she is biased to the core without an iota of integrity, and doesn't deserve to be a part of the judiciary.

@TweetinderKaul @SauravDassss Why is there a video of her saying that every time she attends an RSS function, she is promoted. Wait a minute " she meant it as a joke" so cannot be taken seriously ? Why did Ex SC judge J Oak say that if it was for him he would not attend such functions? Let's not normalise

@LegalTalwar Let’s not mix identity with institutional responsibility. A judge must be evaluated on legal reasoning, not gender or sympathy. Bias should be called out, but not used to avoid scrutiny of the judgment. Motives aside, legal questions still matter

@LegalTalwar Failed politician? No one with a remotely sane mind has agreed with her charade of playing victim. Never seen anything so bizarre as justifications for refusal to recuse.

@LegalTalwar An Unknown Lady suddenly came to Justify the injustice and calling someone a "Failed Politician" who became Chief Minister of Delhi in his Debut Election and joined the list of National Parties with in 11 Years of Party formation.

@Deva_1999_ @LegalTalwar Seems like a failed talwar with no edges

The reaction to Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma has been gendered because I have never seen a judge having to justify what their kids do while sitting on the bench. The pronouncement was emotive for a reason, and the issue became politically charged because of a failed politician unable to deal with losses, accountability for corruption after exposure to VIP culture as Ex-CM. I stand by Ms. Sharma, the woman. Not the judge.

@SauravDassss @iyer_sk @TweetinderKaul Doesn't matter even if someone decides to write an epic, a thesis, anything trying to justify the judge, the more they justify, the more biased the judge looks. She may someday become the CJI bcoz of her powerful patronage, but end of day - she is biased.

The principle here is that the judge should be SEEN to be fair. If multiple litigants have an apprehension that she won’t be impartial in the case given her children’s boss is arguing the matter, who also happens to mark every case to them and thereby ensure how much money they are paid, visibility they get, standing they get, proximity to power they get, how quickly they rise or fall, then is that not reasonable APPREHENSION of possible bias? Any judge who has recused at any point in their career has heard and is hearing tons of cases—that is irrelevant. What matters is the present case and it is no doubt a politically sensitive one. You may not care for the politics of law but it increasingly controls today’s outcomes. Every other judge may not have their children empaneled and their boss arguing before them. That perception of impartiality ought to be maintained in a case like this. In any case, nothing needs to be proved. I still can’t understand how you think this reason, along with other reasons when seen in isolation are easy to shrug off but when seen together are not reasonable enough to apprehend a strong possibility of bias.

Can an individual decide how much tax they should pay? Can a student decide which questions should be asked in an exam? Can an employee decide how much appraisal they should get? But… A judge can decide a case involving herself. A CM can declare his own caste as OBC. A group of MPs can decide their own salary. Beauty of Indian democracy😍