
Hopeful Democrat
21.4K posts

Hopeful Democrat
@LoudCriticism
Just an aware citizen who loves the country more than any party



“Justice Sharma said that even if her relatives are empanelled on Government panels, Kejriwal was still required to show the proximity, relevance, and impact of such empanelment on the case in hand or on the decision-making power of the Court.” WRONG. ABSOLUTELY WRONG. How can the burden to “prove” this be put on a litigant? It is practically impossible. And hence the jurisprudence on recusal requires a litigant to not “prove” bias but only properly convey their “reasonable apprehension” of possible bias due to circumstances such as this. Justice Sharma has got it totally wrong here. The higher courts ought to correct this disastrous judgment on recusal.



UPA & Mr Gandhi should instead follow ths philosophy :) "Give man a fish,yu feed him for a day,teach him fishing,yu feed him for a lifetime"





Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma: "MAIN IS CASE SE RECUSE NAHI KARUNGI. MAIN IS CASE KI SUWAI KARUNGI."



@PranavaBhardwaj Na na... Tuesday hai 😂 Anurag thakur thodi hai...





















