MetPoliceRapistScum

9.3K posts

MetPoliceRapistScum banner
MetPoliceRapistScum

MetPoliceRapistScum

@MetPoliceRapist

We're still number one in the all time UK serialrapist charts.

Beigetreten Nisan 2023
824 Folgt305 Follower
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@mynewcat @peterrhague @BGYKPA No-one buys expensive cars if there are no roads to drive them on either - the existence of roads is a necessary condition for cars Normal people can do sums with rail fares and petrol and compare the two, if road is cheaper they rationally choose to buy a car to get to work.
English
0
0
0
9
Earl Great
Earl Great@mynewcat·
@peterrhague @BGYKPA Not it's not. You're strawmanning too close too the sun on this one. In any given scenario there are many times more people who could be doing a thing but aren't doing that thing because that thing is too annoying. Opening a lane simply lowers the annoyance threshold.
English
1
0
1
42
Peter Hague
Peter Hague@peterrhague·
@BGYKPA Exactly. Roads are a correlate not a cause
English
4
0
134
3.8K
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@peterrhague It says 'attract [existing] cars' not 'bring new cars into existence. But you knew that because your reading comprehension isn't that of a 5 year old. Right wingers pretending to be as retarded as left wingers - when can my kids play in the street again as they traditionally did?
English
1
0
1
266
Binary Surfer
Binary Surfer@BinarySurfer·
In one HR WhatsApp I'm in, last year I saw someone post a table of dismissals (e.g. gross misconduct, non-performance etc.). It showed highest earning minorities (£100k+) having roughly the same chance (within 1%) of being removed from an organisation as the lowest earning non-minorities (~£20k). For context, in most most large companies you would expect to see something in the ~5-15% range for dismissals at minimum wage levels, and only ~1% at the highest wage levels. This means somewhere in the region of a 10x over-representation (medians) compare to what you'd expect in most cases (5-15% for min. wage and ~1% for high earners). There are many possible explanations for this; most likely is a toxic mix of non-meritocratic promotion / hiring + a society increasingly discouraging responsibility or accountability for said groups. Thought @Kingbingo_ and @RadicalLib would like this one particularly.
Lauren Chen@TheLaurenChen

Poor white people have lower rates of criminality than rich black people Poverty does not cause crime

English
6
14
184
8.6K
RAW EGG NATIONALIST
RAW EGG NATIONALIST@Babygravy9·
What's interesting is that pretty much all security guards in the UK--from airports and train stations to supermarkets and, of course migrant hostels--have been replaced by Africans and South Asians. Literally all of them. Really makes you think.
JRF@JRFBoy

I’m sure there’s an incredibly sophisticated economic argument for why we need to import our supermarket security guards from Africa but I have to confess I’m yet to hear it.

English
29
116
1.4K
32.7K
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@ILLBEDEADSPOON @johannesmkx the only bad thing about running vs walking is the stress on the bones, otherwise it's similarly beneficial and better for cardio vascular system
English
0
0
1
15
jeremy
jeremy@ILLBEDEADSPOON·
@johannesmkx My fathers run 50 marathons, and still does 10 mile jogs at 60 y/o. He is always happy. Maybe it had no use case for catching food, but it might’ve for mental stability. Is chasing dopamine not human nature? It’s orgasm seeking extrapolated.
English
2
0
1
36
Johannes M. Koenraadt
Johannes M. Koenraadt@johannesmkx·
I'm not buying that humans are an endurance runner species. We overspecialized for walking and therefore some of us can run marathons. Most people obviously never run a mile in their whole lives. The idea that we were tribes of people running after prey all day, with women and children in tow, is ridiculous. When Europeans found the Australian Aboriginals, for example, their women and children didn't run after prey but gathered easy foods nearby. The males and teenage sons hunted for small prey. It's just that males pass their share of genes on to their daughters. That's doesn't mean we are a race of runners.
English
6
0
15
379
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@johannesmkx Running is bad for you - it stresses the bones. Walking is correlated with longer life - it's the only certain correlation in the whole of medical science. We are literally walking animals the same way cows are standing animals and horses running animals etc.
English
0
0
1
13
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@johannesmkx We didn't run after them, we walked after them until they had to stop to pant. We evolved sweat glands and no hair for this reason - animals have to lose heat by stopping and panting, we don't. When they stop, we threw spears at them, repeat until animal dies of exhaustion.
English
0
0
0
21
Gareth Davies
Gareth Davies@GarethDavies007·
The defence lawyer is Muslim Imran Khan KC born in Pakistan Is it right to allow him to represent these Muslim defendants? mol.im/a/15802191
English
2
2
6
233
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@ClintClease @ClarkeMicah @DailyMail it's not sufficiently disincentivised so they act in their own self-interest by default, i.e. never admit they are wrong or do anything differently the next time except to try harder not to get caught
English
0
0
0
5
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@Reboticant @CovfefeAnon @brut_xeets ilhan omar bringing up the average, but what if you count 30 years of pelosi et al beating the stock market by percentages that are statistically impossible without inside information about the future
English
1
0
4
66
Reboticon
Reboticon@Reboticant·
@CovfefeAnon @brut_xeets Trump/Family do seem objectively corrupt wrt making money, but I think probably he has less total offenses than your average congressman. He just tends to make them count.
English
1
0
4
238
mothman
mothman@brut_xeets·
Anyone not taking into account the earth shattering "cartoon levels of corruption" currently being undertaken by Blue Eyes White President is just a clown.
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon

@ThatOneNuge Honestly would be shocked if that was true considering the (per capita) opportunities for embezzlement Notice that every single black elected official is cartoon levels of corrupt with both government funds and taking bribes

English
8
0
4
5.7K
Covfefe Anon
Covfefe Anon@CovfefeAnon·
@brut_xeets Once again you are defeated by your womanly use of language where you say that every word that means "bad" applies to Trump because "Trump is bad" and people who use language like normal people have no idea what you're talking about
English
5
2
393
4K
MR J R CAMPBELL
MR J R CAMPBELL@MRJRCAMPBE90030·
@toadmeister We live in a closed system. All carbon locked in coal, oil and limestone was once in the atmosphere. So if it was OK to have higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere in the past, why not today?
English
1
0
1
18
Toby Young
Toby Young@toadmeister·
In Episode 78 of the Sceptic: UN scientists admit that central assumptions of the climate alarmist agenda are “implausible”. Plus: the woke madness of “trans time”.
English
6
41
120
4.9K
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@WeasleWords @toadmeister Cults take revenge against apostates (e.g. islam). The post is about climate scientists changing their minds about what they now believe vs what they used to believe. The post criticising them for changing their beliefs sounds a bit vindictive though.
English
0
0
0
6
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@toadmeister Pretty sure it's scientists who insist that your genes detemine your sex. It's almost as if science is a method whose truths are contingent upon evidence and can change accordingly, but evidence that they have won't convince the true believer in 'science bad, scientists evil'.
English
0
0
0
11
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@YarnlerStiggums @charlesmurray don't bother trying to work out the libertarian position until they have worked out their position on 'freedom from' and 'freedom to', or how self-interest is supreme yet 'rights' to free association somehow trump it
English
0
0
0
5
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@dpheneghan1 @charlesmurray Well no because human beings are notoriously only able to experience their own emotions and not those of an abstract mass of other human beings, and tend to be motivated by self-interest since that's how they got to be alive in the first place.
English
0
0
0
59
Daniel Heneghan
Daniel Heneghan@dpheneghan1·
So, your epiphany occurred when you were a little vexed by some trivial and inconsequential consumer transaction, but it never occurred to you how mass immigration negatively pressed the lives of tens of millions of the poorest Americans, crushing wages, increasing housing costs, freezing them out of vocations, the social fabric coming apart leading to increased social atomization and alienation, rendering a sense of community for the poor almost impossible, bowling alone the new new, permanent normal. Ok, boomer.
English
1
0
6
4.3K
Charles Murray
Charles Murray@charlesmurray·
The evolution in my own views on immigration tracks closely this. In my case, I had an internal conflict between my libertarian instincts on immigration and the practical implications of mass immigration. I think the inflection point came the first time I phoned a business and got "Press one for English, dos para espanol."
Pincher Martin@PincherMartin8

American conservatives didn't care as much as about immigration from the 1960s through the 1980s. I think that speaks to the success of the nineteen-twenties' legislation that limited it. The 1924 Johnson-Reed Act succeeded so well that American conservatives eventually forgot immigration was an important and consequential issue, and that their ideological forebears had, for good reason, fought hard to limit it. Goldwater published a short, but famous book in 1960 called THE CONSCIENCE OF A CONSERVATIVE in which he dealt with conservative issues he felt important to the country. You know, like farm subsidies and labor unions. Goldwater doesn't mention immigration once in the book. Not even in passing. The word "immigration" doesn't come up at all in a search of the book's contents. But starting with Goldwater, the GOP began a subtle and slow shift to the liberal vision of immigration, one that took decades to complete. In Goldwater's 1964 presidential campaign, he mentioned the need to revise the 1952 McCarran-Walter Act. Nixon followed in 1968 and 1972 with qualified support for the 1965 Immigration Act. Again, there was no emphasis by Goldwater or Nixon on immigration. They rarely spoke of the issue, and I don't think either one cared about it that much. Ford and Reagan did the same in 1976 and 1980, but a shift was taking place. Ford and Reagan made warm comments about immigrants and the centrality of the immigrant experience to American history. Republican political elites now largely saw mass immigration as a public good that benefited everyone rather than a potential public danger that needed to be tightly regulated. By the late 1980s, the issue of immigration was growing in importance and public awareness. It wasn't just the 1986 amnesty. Californians were beginning to feel the pressure of so many foreign residents, many of them illegals. A TV show called ALIEN NATION made its premiere in 1989, using a sci-fi premise to deal with themes like immigration and assimilation. Pat Buchanan began focusing on immigration in his writings in the early 1990s and featured the issue prominently in his first presidential campaign in 1992. California Governor Pete Wilson used the issue of illegals to win a come-from-behind re-election victory in 1994. That same year the state's voters overwhelmingly supported limiting illegals' access to benefits. Unfortunately, the two Republican presidents who would bookend the decade of the 1990s were the two Bushes, and their attitude toward immigrants would be far more accommodating than the Goldwater to Reagan sequence of GOP leaders. The first Bush enthusiastically passed one of the most liberal immigration acts in U.S. history in 1990 - legislation that was far more damaging than Reagan's amnesty. The second Bush tried to do the same in 2006 and 2007 (but failed), and when given the opportunity to shut unneeded immigration down after 9/11 for national security reasons, took a hard pass. Unlike GOP leaders from Goldwater to Reagan, there is every indication that the two Bushes were enthusiastic proponents of mass immigration.

English
23
15
272
47.6K
MetPoliceRapistScum
MetPoliceRapistScum@MetPoliceRapist·
@Sargon_of_Akkad Landlords - somehow both the most evil greedy people on earth but at the same time will let their property at a loss when the rent is capped, out of the kindness of their hearts.
English
0
0
1
277