John C

429 posts

John C

John C

@Neutralhhjj

Beigetreten Nisan 2024
12 Folgt2 Follower
Arcshan
Arcshan@Arcshanqixb·
@Neutralhhjj @Born_In_54 @Beastnuggie @AtheistTakes Logically I can come to that conclusion, why should I need absolute proof my worldview is correct? Any theology aside, rationally I believe our world had a beginning and it makes no logical sense for something to begin out of nothing, therefore God exists
English
1
0
1
25
John C
John C@Neutralhhjj·
@x_L_Ls @AlphaForDummies @AtheistTakes @doofgeek4011 1. It violates his own nature. All powerfull, all knowing and all good has not reason to build flawed creation because he attribution entails perfection. Anything that he creates is perfect by definition.
English
1
0
0
12
XL_Ls
XL_Ls@x_L_Ls·
@Neutralhhjj @AlphaForDummies @AtheistTakes @doofgeek4011 You left out the entire argument. I said it’s a non sequitur to claim that a perfect designer must create a perfect design. That’s absurd. He could very well have sufficient reasons to create imperfect designs. It’s on you to demonstrate why god couldn’t have such reasons.
English
1
0
0
18
John C
John C@Neutralhhjj·
@x_L_Ls @AlphaForDummies @AtheistTakes @doofgeek4011 We are not talking about expert builder. We are talking about a all perfect and all knowing designer. " is under no logical obligation to always build houses at the top tier" you presusming he has reason not to.
English
1
0
0
13
XL_Ls
XL_Ls@x_L_Ls·
@Neutralhhjj @AlphaForDummies @AtheistTakes @doofgeek4011 An expert house builder can build a lesser quality house if that serves his plans. He is under no logical obligation to always build houses at the top tier. That’s a non sequitur. We know that minds can come up with sufficient reasons to lower the quality of designs
English
1
0
0
20
GodsNode
GodsNode@GodsNode·
Atheism has been debunked.
English
2
1
19
781
Aaron Haskins
Aaron Haskins@TungstenMonarch·
@Neutralhhjj @BlueTimeFairy @Truth_matters20 I suppose it could be an either / or statement of fact, so both. Going back to the No. 1 analogy. We have to presuppose the No. 1 exists, therefore it's also an axiom because to say otherwise would destroy our reality. Could you live life without numbers?No you could not.
English
1
0
0
27
John C
John C@Neutralhhjj·
@Ratiolus @AtheistPhoenix This is why you cant have good faith debates with thiest. They engage in projection, adhomina attacks, answeing question with another question. I hope you find peace in your life dude.
English
1
0
0
27
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
@Neutralhhjj @AtheistPhoenix You are in no position to demand answers after the display of stupidity and ignorance you just performed. Go study on your own little donkey.
English
1
0
0
14
ratiolus
ratiolus@Ratiolus·
@Neutralhhjj @AtheistPhoenix Thats how you approach information? “Either answer my wrong stupidly frame question or you don’t know nothing“ LOL Do your community a favor and don’t vote.
English
1
0
0
17