ratiolus

Every idea sounds stronger in an echo.

@Tsar_Martyr Atheism = fanaticism

Atheists are extremely close minded

Qué descaro. Si tu ateísmo fuera simplemente no creer en Dios, sería una preferencia privada sin mayor interés público. Pero no lo es. Tu cuenta existe para hablar de religión, burlarte de creyentes, reducir tradiciones enteras a estupidez, presentar la fe como ignorancia y vender propaganda antirreligiosa como si fuera pensamiento crítico. Lo tuyo no es “falta de creencia”. Es un intento bastante patético de rentabilizar una imagen de lucidez que no solo no te sale, sino que ni siquiera se toma el trabajo de pensar. Cualquier persona cerca de ti debería poner atención, porque las red flags de narcisismo y egocentrismo son alarmantes.

No soy ateo porque algo me pasó. No soy ateo porque odio a DIOS. Soy ateo por la misma razón que tú no crees en Ganesha: no hay evidencia suficiente. La única diferencia es que yo aplico esa lógica a todas las deidades.

@isaacrrr7 Es todo ser humano que convierte la mentira en poder, la crueldad en virtud, la humillación en justicia, el orgullo en verdad y la destrucción del otro en causa moral.

¿Quién crees que es/fue el representante de Satanás en la Tierra?

@Allezamani It means trying to live through humility, forgiveness, sacrifice, mercy, truth, responsibility, love, and the refusal to return evil for evil.

What do people exactly mean when they say they have given their lives to Christ? 🤔

@_utibe7 Oh, you are one of those people who attack AI when they have no ideas of their own. LOL

@Ratiolus @lorddrey now retype this without Ai

Religious people are too fhucking dumb. Even if I use the name of God in a sarcasm 200 million times back to back You will still find stupid comments like. "I thought you were an atheist?" That is why they are the easiest targets to scams. "Belivers I saw a vision that God said this token will pump." Stupid people. They will believe it and start investing their money there. If I wake up tomorrow and tell them that God arrested me and now I am a Prophet or pastor. The Stupid folks will still belive me and send me a lot of money and their wives will make me sleep with them because I carry anointing...

El Papa no es la Biblia. La Iglesia institucional no es Éxodo. Y una disculpa por el papel histórico de una institución en la esclavitud no prueba que el texto bíblico haya inventado la esclavitud ni que la eleve como ideal moral. Son los seres humanos quienes corrompen instituciones, religiones, leyes, doctrinas e ideologías.

@Ratiolus @ateo_digital El papa León XIV pide perdón por el papel histórico de la Iglesia en la esclavitud jornada.com.mx/noticia/2026/0…

La Biblia avala la esclavitud en más de 20 versículos. Si tu moral viene de ese libro, el problema no es la religión: eres tú interpretándola "a tu manera" para no incomodarte.

La amistad consuela. La justicia consuela. El perdón consuela. El alcohol adormece. La negación evade. Las ilusiones falsifican. La religión no te adormece ni te evita la realidad. Te enfrenta a la culpa, al límite, al deber, al perdón, al sacrificio y a la responsabilidad Todo lo que sale de tu marco mental viene mal procesado.

"La religión da consuelo." También lo da el alcohol, la negación y las ilusiones. El consuelo no valida la verdad. Puedes sentirte bien creyendo algo falso.

This is just attention-seeking disguised as criticism. Most religious people are not walking around every morning claiming God gave them private instructions. They are trying to live inside a tradition, a moral language, a community, a discipline, a sense of duty, guilt, forgiveness, restraint, and meaning.

I've seen too many instances where people thought that God told them something, and He really didn't.

@___TheGOOdWitch Prove what exactly? That killing is wrong? That cruelty corrupts the human being? That helping your neighbor is good? That forgiveness matters? That pride destroys? That power needs limits? That your actions still matter when nobody is watching?

La semilla del odio no la siembra la Biblia. La siembra gente como tú. La siembra esta forma mediocre de pensar que necesita trasladar la responsabilidad moral del ser humano hacia una institución, un libro, una religión, una ideología o una tradición. No mata “la Biblia”. Mata el hombre. No esclaviza “la religión”. Esclaviza el hombre. No miente, roba, tortura, persigue o domina un texto. Lo hace el ser humano. Justamente eso es lo que la Biblia intenta interiorizar: que el problema no está siempre afuera. Está en el ser humano. En su orgullo, su miedo, su violencia, su deseo de poder y su capacidad infinita para culpar a otro.

@Purrymann113 “Coping mechanism.” Which one exactly? Helping your neighbor, forgiving people, restraining your worst impulses, seeing dignity in the weak, living under moral accountability, trying to make suffering bearable without becoming cruel? Be specific.

Religious people think irreligious people do not understand their theology, but in reality we actually reject religion precisely because we fully understood it and came to see it as a coping mechanism, not divine revelation.

Da vergüenza ajena el tener que explicarte que en la antigüedad la gente transmitía enseñanzas morales a través de parábolas y simbología porque así se educaba antes de que existieran los libros de texto. Estás aplicando lógica proposicional a una parábola. Es el equivalente a leer la fábula de la liebre y la tortuga y concluir que las tortugas no pueden ganar carreras porque son más lentas. Hazte ver.

Si DIOS es omnisciente, sabía que Adán y Eva comerían el fruto. Si es omnipotente, pudo impedirlo. Si es omnibenevolente, no habría castigado a toda la humanidad por eso. Elige dos, no pueden ser los tres.

The deepest function of the concept of God was to establish the idea that nothing human beings do escapes the moral order. Not power, not secrecy, not cruelty, not betrayal, not what you do when no one is watching. Whether God exists or not is something each person has to face privately. But the meaning of the concept should be understood by believers and non-believers alike. It was never just about proving an invisible being. It was about placing the human being under moral accountability.

Does god really exists or the concept is just something we feel we need to keep reality in check?

Los únicos obsesionados con que la Biblia funcione como un manual de “moral divina absoluta” redactado fuera de la historia son fanáticos y ateos como tú. Curioso que ambos necesiten la misma lectura patética para sentirse inteligentes. Éxodo 21 no dice “pegarle a un esclavo está bien”. Es derecho antiguo regulando una realidad brutal que ya existía: servidumbre, deuda, propiedad doméstica, castigo, dependencia económica y ausencia total de instituciones modernas. Deuteronomio 20 no inventa la guerra ni la esclavitud de conquistados. Regula prácticas de guerra en un mundo donde la derrota podía significar exterminio, servidumbre o absorción forzada. ¿Es horrible desde hoy? Sí. ¿Significa que el texto nació como manifiesto moral ideal? No. Significa que estás leyendo legislación antigua como si fuera una declaración de derechos humanos de 2026. Inspiración divina no significa ventriloquia celestial ni código jurídico perfecto desde la primera página. Significa una tradición humana intentando ordenar, limitar y transformar la brutalidad humana con las categorías morales disponibles en su tiempo. El mismo ejercicio lo podría hacer alguien en 3.000 años con nuestras leyes sobre fronteras, pobreza, deuda, guerra, vigilancia, trabajo precario o propiedad, y concluir que nuestra civilización secular era una barbarie porque“avalaba” todo lo que regulaba. Que sería exactamente lo que haces tú: confundir regulación histórica con ideal moral porque no sabes contextualizar. Entre más leo a descerebrados como tú, más claro queda que el ateísmo y el fanatismo religioso son exactamente lo mismo.

@Ratiolus @ateo_digital Si la moral bíblica es relativa al contexto histórico cuando les conviene (esclavitud, genocidio), entonces ya admitieron que no es una moral absoluta revelada por Dios omnisciente y bueno, sino un producto cultural de su tiempo. Game over para el argumento de inspiración divina

I agree with the spirit of this. Religion has often been misrepresented, institutionalized, weaponized, and buried under human power games. The words of Jesus have been used by people who were not trying to follow him, but to control, exclude, dominate, and protect their own authority. The same has happened with every belief system, secular or non-secular. Human beings corrupt whatever language has power. The true legacy of religion is what Jesus embodied: seeing the other, standing with the weak, forgiving, breaking the cycle of retaliation, exposing hypocrisy, putting love above pride, and reminding human beings that moral truth is not found in status, tribe, punishment, or power. That is what should be rescued from religious tradition. Not every institution built around the message. Not every doctrine men later used to defend themselves. The message itself. It is time to reclaim religion from both bad believers and shallow critics, and return it to what it was always trying to carry: union, love, mercy, truth, and the moral transformation of the human being.

THE THINGS NOBODY IN CHURCH WANTS TO HEAR 🏛️ Jesus Christ was not a Christian. He was a Jew. Born Jewish. Raised Jewish. Worshipped as a Jew. And He never not once asked anyone to start a religion in His name. Here’s what they don’t teach you in Sunday school. The Bible didn’t exist when Jesus walked the earth. The New Testament was written decades after His death. Councils of men bishops, theologians, political figures sat in rooms and voted on what goes in and what stays out. That’s not me attacking scripture. That’s just history. And yet we treat the Bible like it fell from heaven pre-bound with a leather cover. Jesus never said “read my book.” He said “FOLLOW ME.” There’s a difference. A massive one. He never built a church with bricks. He never drew denominational lines. He never handed out membership cards. When He talked about the church, He was talking about something happening inside of you a kingdom not built with human hands. “The kingdom of God is within you.” Luke 17:21 The Bible is a witness to Jesus. Not a replacement for Him. When the witness becomes the object of worship, we have lost the entire point. Stop worshipping the map. Find the destination. Jesus didn’t come to start Christianity. He came to end the distance between God and man. That’s the gospel nobody is preaching. Stay guided my people 🙏🏾

People do not become religious because they think atheists are incapable of morality. They become religious because they recognize themselves inside a tradition: its symbols, rituals, moral language, community, memory, suffering, forgiveness, duty, and meaning. This atheist habit of inventing the dumbest possible motive and then arguing against it is honestly revealing. It is the same way they read everything else: religion, politics, law, justice, morality. Always from a position of assumed moral superiority they neither earned nor consistently practice.

Why do Religious people always feel you need to be religious to have morals? 🤨

@CAB__1896 @ateo_digital WOW tremenda revelación. Supongo que en tu mente limitada eso agota toda la discusión. Mientras tanto sigues aceptando lenguaje moral secular proveniente de leyes y doctrinas que fueron todas construidas sobre lenguaje religioso 😂

@Ratiolus @ateo_digital Eso demuestra que la escribieron hombres, y no un ser omnisciente, y perfectamente bueno

@paulogia0 Christ is not interesting because people think he is their imaginary friend. He is interesting because the figure carries guilt, sacrifice, forgiveness, suffering, innocence, power, death, moral failure, and the possibility of redemption.

Christianity isn't a religion, it's a parasocial relationship with an npc.

This is painfully dumb. The story is about human beings being placed inside order, given freedom, encountering a limit, violating it, then discovering shame, blame, exile, desire, responsibility, and moral rupture. It is a narrative structure through which the human being discovers what freedom means when desire meets prohibition.