
PARAN0I8
1.6K posts




Silent Hill Five copies sold
















Ok and just for the sake of it, here's REmake in first person




Last night in Leister Square, I challenged OrthodoxMuslim to debate the Islamic dilemma, he refused and started name calling while his body guards got physical. Finally he got his best friend to attack us. It was all recorded live. Dawah is desperation.



Taliban wants women to be modest but uneducated Islamophobes want women to be educated but immodest The Islamic republic wants women to be educated and modest








Islam doing what Islam does best





Nothing you said actually contradicts my point or anything I said. A common tactic for lefty commies, so I’m used to it, but here you go: A tax credit is STILL taxpayer support (I thought that would be pretty obvious but I guess we gotta start spelling things out here). If the Italian government allows a studio to reduce its tax burden by 25 percent on development costs, that is STILL public money subsidizing the project. Whether it’s a direct grant or a tax credit is just a different mechanism for the same outcome. I do not care about how people try to play word games with reality. My criticism has never been about whether this is common. It absolutely is. Canada, the UK, and many EU countries do this. I personally do not believe in it and would prefer governments altogether stay out of this area of “support”. It creates an uneven playing field for developers and games become made to thread that needle of requirements instead of the vision. Ultimately, my main point is that taxpayers are still partially footing the bill for projects they had no say in funding. The fact that it’s ‘standard industry practice’ doesn’t just automatically make something good policy. In fact, seeing where the industry is right now, I’m a bit perplexed how ANYONE could think otherwise, UNLESS they or their company was benefiting from said “breaks” Hmm 🤔












