Rusty Rocket

WATCH: Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson and Candace Owens @RealCandaceO laugh about the assassination of Charlie Kirk by Tyler Robinson! WATCH this video of both of them LAUGHING about the murder of Charlie Kirk. Candace and @byoussef laughed hysterically while “joking” about how they think @MrsErikaKirk Erika Kirk supposedly murdered her husband. And on Friday, during his interview with Russell Brand @rustyrockets, Tucker laughed so hard at the thought of Charlie Kirk being assassinated, that he cried from laughing. Tucker then proceeded to post this video short on his official YouTube channel of himself hysterically laughing about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk. Tucker titled the YouTube short “The Truth About Tyler Robinson”. Russell Brand was “joking” about Tyler Robinson murdering Charlie Kirk by insinuating that the shooter with a furry trans boyfriend was controlled by "the most powerful interests in the world." Gee, I wonder which "most powerful people" Russell and Tucker had in mind... The only people who laugh at the thought of ANYONE being brutally executed are sociopaths. And yet, here we have both Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens laughing about the murder of their supposed "friend." Tucker and Candace aren't just grifters, they're ghouls! Tucker is every bit as evil as Candace, and anyone who still supports them will be joining them in the fiery pits of hell. Cc: @TPUSA @tylerbowyer @AndrewKolvet @JDVance

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Unearthed Video Of Larry Loomer Making Out With Her "REAL" Fiance instead of Andrew Jacob Simpson who is the guy she paid to pretend to be her fiance when she got in hot water with Trump over her comments that she polished his knob and @billmaher amplified it. 👀 Also now we know why you love eating dog food so much. 😂 @LauraLoomer @titoamboy You are the only bully. Stop trying to pretend like you didn't start the attacks.🍿

@AlexBerenson @jordanbpeterson Did you watch the video? I laid out exactly what’s happening for morons like you. In painful detail. How dare you.

“From Destiny's standpoint, there's no such thing as a moral fact. None. They don't exist. Everything is dependent upon stance.” What are the philosophical underpinnings behind the left–right divide? Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon breaks it down: moral relativism vs moral realism. Subjective vs objective truth. Rights vs duties. Progress vs tradition. That’s the real clash.

It’s very important to note what tactic @RealCandaceO is using here, and why. She is deliberately misrepresenting my words, and for a reason. This is exactly what I posted: “The bullet jacket fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk’s body during autopsy matches a .30 caliber class bullet. The .30 caliber bullet matches the .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie Kirk. This per the ATF ballistics analysis. AND before anyone says “the ATF fabricated this”— This ATF report was filed by THE DEFENSE. Tyler Robinson’s lawyers aren’t denying this, they ADMITTED it by filing this report to the court themselves.” Let’s be very clear: the ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used to shoot Charlie. Which is what my original post was about. Candace claims my second sentence is claiming that the ballistics of the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy match the ballistics from the bullet that law enforcement test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. But that’s obviously NOT how anyone would interpret my words in the context of the entire post. (I also did an entire episode last week breaking down the “inconclusive” report and what it means). Which is why Candace selectively cherry-picked that sentence without the context to trick people into thinking I said something I didn’t. It’s the same tactic Media Matters uses to try to cancel conservatives. You’re familiar with it. The cherry-picked out-of-context quote that they portray to mean something entirely different. The only difference between Candace and Media Matters is Media Matters lies to trick advertisers to pull ad campaigns from their targets, while Candace is willfully twisting my words in order to distract YOU from the reality of the ATF report and how it devastates the entire house of cards Candace built by claiming Charlie couldn’t possibly have been killed by a bullet fired from a .30-06 rifle. But make no mistake, you SHOULD look at exactly what Candace doesn’t want you to see: The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie’s body is consistent with the type of bullet fired by the kind of .30-06 rifle like Tyler Robinson’s rifle. And the DEFENSE filed this ATF report, which means Tyler Robinson’s attorneys aren’t denying this fact. Again, people are smart enough to recognize the nuance of the ATF report that finds that the bullet jacket fragment retrieved from Charlie’s body during autopsy is CONSISTENT with the kind of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used, while the “inconsistent” result refers to the inability of the analysts to positively identity or exclude specific ballistics markings on the damaged fragment with a bullet they test-fired from Tyler Robinson’s rifle.