Good Lawgic

Kid Cudi's riveting court testimony about his confrontation with Diddy was only seen by a few hundred people. Now, through AI wizardry, you can watch it as if you hear his voice telling the story. youtu.be/b2ZknZQktwA?si…

Not to my knowledge. I think it is hilarious that folks like you believe that the same entity who is brilliantly and discreetly behind every event you dislike, is also so bumbling and stupid as to share their plans with teen furries so they would excitedly announce it on a gaming platform. Are they genius manipulators or complete idiots? The only way to find a way to try and pin this on Mossad is to claim they are both. But you cannot be bothered to permit glaring inconsistencies slow you down when you have decided "the facts" based on where you wish to pin blame before considering any evidence.

@TheFollowingPro @MegynKellyShow @joekent16jan19 Had a lot of text exchanges with Mossad, huh?

“There were additional leads that we needed to run down and fully investigate, and that was simply not done…” @joekent16jan19 on why he believes there's much more to investigate related to the Charlie Kirk assassination.   Watch below, and subscribe: youtube.com/c/MegynKelly/?…

We tend to categorize people as "good" and "evil" and hesitate to see the evil in that which is good or the good in that which we deem evil. A strong mind can appreciate that people are rarely a monolith. Joe Kent is a war hero and every American owes him a debt that goes far beyond appreciation and gratitude. Like any war hero who survives the conflict, their story continues after they walk off the battlefield. Sometimes, they rise. Sometimes they dip. Or worse, crash and burn. In their post-battle epitaphs, we have seen exceptional war heroes achieve tremendous greatness (Washington and countless others). We have seen terrible betrayals (Benedict Arnold and countless others). Politics often play a role in their post-script. We have seen war veterans be wrongly besmirched by a government that deemed them a hazard (Michael Flynn). We have seen politics and greed make war heroes become genuinely bad influences to our military/republic (Captain Mark Kelly, Col. Vindman). Two things we learned about Joe Kent this week are that he resigned while citing issues with the Iran conflict and that he is under investigation for government leaks. The two seem closely related. It feels as if there is a chicken-egg relationship between them. Which came first and led to the other? You will likely fall into one of two camps depending on whether you like what he is currently saying or not. But your opinion is almost certainly based on what you hope is true rather than any thing you know to be true. Here are the primary reasons that I suspect, he is closer to a Kelly/Vindman than a Flynn: i) The investigation happened really fast, seemingly too fast for it to have begun after he quit. ii) The claims that he was cut out of the loop months ago are consistent with him being suspected of leaking. iii) The rapidity with which he has been booked by every anti-Iran commentator suggest a healthy ongoing relationship with people that he allegedly leaked to. iv) A blitzkrieg of uniform messaging about Kent from the anti-Iran folks feels no more organic than the anti-ICE protests. v) A lack of holes in the claim that he leaked other than his resume as an exceptional soldier. If the leak claim were manufactured in response to his departure, we would likely learn of flaws in the story pretty quickly. None of that is to suggest that I know he did something wrong. I do not know any more about the truth behind the scenes than you. We are all speculating. The Court of public opinion wastes little time on deliberation. It is okay to say "I suspect [insert your side] is telling the truth, but I do not yet know." That is truth. That is healthy. That reflects a strong mind.

The Following Program: Comey Subpoenaed in Florida, Bibi Steps In It, Kent Conspiracy Swells & More x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Starting 10:30 PM EDT- The Following Program: Comey Subpoenaed in Florida, Bibi Steps In It, Kent Conspiracy Swells & More youtube.com/watch?v=D495TH…

@misfitpatriot_ Hahahaha. All these clowns talking about "Charlie's last words to me..." remind me of the Sopranos' Jo-Jo Palmice after her husband Mickey was killed: "At least I know that the last thing he ever said to me was 'I love you!'."

Anyone buying this shit? I bet the actual last thing Charlie ever said to Joe Kent was “Nice to see you, Jim” instead of “Do whatever you can to undermine my friend, and your boss, the President I fought tirelessly to put into office”.

@misfitpatriot_ Hahahaha. All these clowns talking about "Chalie's last words to me..." remind me of the Sopranos season 1 finale. Mickey Palmice wife saying "At least the last thing he said to me was 'I love you!'."

@GrantGooch @krystalball Lol. Yeah, stopped in 2003. Obama flew planes of cash to them as a reward for their good behavior.

@TheFollowingPro @krystalball Come on, Joe. This guy is talking about the beginning of Iran's nuclear program back in the 70s. It's been well documented since 2003 that Iran was secretly pursuing a bomb. According to the IAEA in 2007, Iran stopped their weapons progam in 2003. They re-affirmed in 2015.

What a lying sack of shit. The first Trump admin ripped up a nuclear deal that was working. The Iranians had offered extraordinary concessions in the latest round of negotiations before we used the ruse of diplomacy to attack their country and murder their leader. And btw that leader was the guy who had issued a religious decree AGAINST nuclear weapons. The truth is Iran is FAR MORE likely to pursue nukes now because of the actions of Trump, Hegseth and this entire band of war criminals.

MAGA 2.0 is the only reason these hacks are excitedly screaming "MAGA IS DEAD!" every day for 9 months. If they cared about America and generally thought MAGA had died, they would be in mourning. I think they care about America. I just think they are trying to kill MAGA rather than observing/identifying events as they unfold.

@TheFollowingPro @Cernovich @ElectionWiz Yet everyone laughed when DJT announced was running. Look what happened. Find the right words and momentum and you have MAGA 2.0

A Tucker Carlson / Joe Kent ticket would steam roll anything Democrats or Republicans could bring. It's laughable when people try to argue this with me. Spend some time offline. Good looking, physically fit white men are back "in."

@Cernovich Similarly ironic if he is under investigation for leaking info to Tucker Carlson and he was meeting with Tucker when the news broke of the investigation. Reports indicate that my ironic take is more likely.

It would be ironic if Joe Kent is under investigation for leaking the secret meeting Mike Huckabee had with a convicted spy.

@mmpadellan You need ID to shovel for the City. You disingenuous hacks have gotten boring with your weird swing and misses at a "Gotcha!".

Over the course of my life, I have shoveled snow dozens of times, and not ONCE have I ever needed an ID. Never needed a passport to go to work either. Hell, my drivers' license is sufficient to board a plane as long as I'm flying within the continental U.S. These jackasses are doing a verbal sleight-of-hand. They keep saying "You can't do ___ without an ID," to make it seem like DEMs are being unreasonable. "Oh, why are you so opposed to voter ID? You need an ID to buy cigarettes / buy beer / watch a sunset." But they're not telling the whole story, they think everybody's dumb: they want you to THINK they're just talking about drivers' licenses as ID. They're NOT. Their stupid "SAVE Act" does not find drivers' licenses, college IDs, or even military IDs as acceptable -- you need a passport. That costs $165. And in order to get a passport, you need a certified birth certificate. So THAT is a big difference, isn't it? Drivers' license to buy beer? Fine, no prob. Drivers' license to vote? Sure, I have that. BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PASSPORT TO VOTE? Now you have to make an appointment to apply for a copy of your birth certificate, then get passport picture taken, PAY $165 for passport, wait 4-6 weeks. If you had to do all that to buy a beer, buy a pack of cigarettes, or shovel snow, you'd rightly be pissed. Now apply that to voting. They're ALSO not saying how their unconstitutional POLL TAX bill does away with mail-in ballots. It's not a voter ID bill. It's a voter suppression bill.

"Hi, I just converted to Catholicism three seconds ago. I am now the ultimate authority on who is or isn't Christian. Please subscribe to my podcast where I'm going to talk about Israel and the Joooooz all the time while complaining it's illegal to talk about them. I have no discernible skills, no intelligence, and nothing original to add, but I'm going to talk about the Jooooz all day every day. If I criticize you, I'm just asking questions. If you criticize me, you're trying to silence me. Anyway, find me on Russia Today and Iranian State TV."

@Sudsiii @LeaderJohnThune You could not find 10 Democrats willing to talk for 6 hours. I would be shocked if you found 5.

@TheFollowingPro @LeaderJohnThune Even if someone talks from say 8am to 2pm, that’s it for the day. Because a new speech starting at 2pm could go all night, and republicans won’t all want to stay all night. So: one speech per day

ONE MAN decides if the SAVE America Act passes. @LeaderJohnThune If he strictly enforces the 2-Speech Limit, it passes. If he does not. It dies. John Thune needs to know that Americans realize this. He needs to know that his legacy is FOREVER TIED to this bill. If it passes, he is a legend. Forever. If it dies, he is a dismal failure. Forever. No "budget reconciliations" to get the vote to 50 which would bloat the deficit and/or be rejected under the Byrd Rule. No invoking cloture to "get Democrats on the record." That is all utter nonsense. Strictly enforce the 2-speech rule for bills returning to the Senate. That is all that needs doing. If Senators and the public share the message that SAVE America, for better or worse, is his legacy he will come around.

@Sudsiii @LeaderJohnThune Why would it be one speech per day?

@TheFollowingPro @LeaderJohnThune Do you realize that with 47 senators each giving two speeches, assuming one speech per day it will take over 5 months to exhaust all the allowed speeches. No other business could be done without starting over. Is that what you want to happen?

@andy_schreiber @LeaderJohnThune At a certain point, they run out of speakers who can talk and you have a vote on simple majority of 50.

@TheFollowingPro @LeaderJohnThune How would the 2-speech limit ensure that the bill passes?

@RodDMartin @disturbedxmike They were screaming "MAGA IS DEAD!" since July.

@disturbedxmike So what? Guys like you have been screaming "MAGA is split!" for weeks, and then the minute the numbers are against you, you just shift to another argument. You're losing because we see your dishonesty.

Well so much for that narrative. On Iran, Trump beats Tucker, Megyn, & Candace 83% to 6% among Republicans. Compared to prominent podcasters Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, both of whom have criticized the president over the Iran war, a new poll found 83% of likely Republican voters trust Trump’s judgment, while just 6% place more confidence in the former Fox News hosts. Even more respondents (84%) agree with Trump’s foreign policy views over Carlson and Kelly (6%), while 85% say they take the president more seriously on world affairs than media commentators and podcasters (6% again). If a GOP candidate was more aligned with the Carlson-Kelly camp, 55% of respondents said they would be less likely to support that candidate, while just 19% said they were more likely to give them their vote. This is the fifth poll finding similar numbers I've posted in the last week from across the political spectrum, including Fox, NBC, CNN, and Rasmussen. Source: New York Post

@TheModerateCase Love to get you on my show brother.

This is why I can't take Megyn Kelly as serious as I used to.

@LauraLoomer @joekent16jan19 @FBI Instead of telling us what YOU THINK Charlie felt about Trump and Iran, why not just play the clip of him expressing his view: x.com/DanielCohenTV/…

Joe Kent @joekent16jan19 is truly deranged. He is now trying to suggest the Trump administration had Charlie Kirk killed for opposing war with Iran. Notice the dig at the @FBI to try to diminish their investigation into Kent for allegedly leaking classified information. Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk. Tucker and Kent are both crackpots.