Angehefteter Tweet
Vixie
8.8K posts
Vixie
@VixieTSQ
Software engineer and wannabe musician PFP: @he_xuan33 Lost in perverted sentimentality 37453521D3E125EA74E2C096B046FE9520F8F0E3
the Bay Area | she/they Beigetreten Temmuz 2016
622 Folgt316 Follower
We get up to some shiiiiiiiiiiit too, It's alright
BlackRedGuard ☭ 🇵🇸🔻⛓️💥@OGBlackRedGuard
Yes, people in my tradition did horrible and unnecessary things to anarchist comrades, and I apologize. Arrest and killing of good comrades who contributed to the cause is bad. We will not repeat these things. Now, let’s work together.
English
Vixie retweetet
Liberals will literally look at you with a straight face and say "proletariat means poor"
mollynew@FearInherent
Also imagine looking at a room full of Yale students and calling them "proletariats"
English
@logicalityman @realsigridjin Like... for geolocation?
I can't bring myself to believe that's much more of a problem than it already is, unless you're arguing the use of carrier grade NAT should be encouraged for security reasons
English
hmm
finally admitted ipv6 is a mess and dropped an internet draft for ipv8
if an ipv4 address looks like 1.1.1.1, an ipv8 address looks like 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
kinda wild it took 25 years to just suggest making the numbers longer haha
English
@logicalityman @realsigridjin Uhhhh technically? Uniquely identifiable, but that doesn't mean anyone knows anything about the device other than that it exists
English
@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin With no NAT every device on the internet is uniquely identifiable. Governments love this idea.
English
@Insanegame2025 @ozeniken @flano_yuki It is a thing! But ipv6 was still designed with a NATless focus
English
@VixieTSQ @ozeniken @flano_yuki IPv6 Nat is a thing and a standard there's two versions of it nat 66 and a stateless version that is one to one npt
English
『Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)』
ietf.org/archive/id/dra…
お、なんかIPv8という提案仕様がIETFに提出されてる
日本語
@Insanegame2025 @realsigridjin exactly! The format that the spec specifies could basically just be swapped out for something else and it would still largely be ipv6 lol
English
@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin Technically you can do it in decimal it's worse because has 16 sections instead of eight this is what IPv6 looks like in decimal 128.255.12.192.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1
English
@realsigridjin there're so many actual controversial technical differences you could argue about, but noooooo
I don't like how the address looks when it's formatted into text
it's the most consumer coded shit ever, it actually makes me way madder than it should
English
@realsigridjin is everyone's issue with ipv6 just that they don't like how the addresses are displayed? like a little bit of hexadecimal is that much of a deal breaker? it's quite petty
English
Vixie retweetet
The pilot being your favorite episode in Murder Drones is a red flag
English
I still truly cannot comprehend why someone would want their integer width to be dependent on their compile target, other than for pointer sized integers
allisx86@allisx86
English
@ozeniken @flano_yuki IPV6 isn't getting adopted because getting rid of NAT would put network engineers out of the job
so obviously you gotta put NAT back in
English
@flano_yuki am i crazy or is this a straight up downgrade from ipv6, where before any 2 networks in the world, even intranets, didn't overlap. now they might so there's a reserved section for the NAT you'll have to do.
English
@pleasedburger @flano_yuki something about json being a normative reference in a IP layer standard just... hurts me inside
English
@VixieTSQ @flano_yuki this has to be some sort of elaborate evil prank
English
@kondonator I think odd numbered versions are reserved for experimental versions
English
I had a dream where all my cherished belongings got covered in feces and sewage that spontaneously exploded from the ceiling.
What could it mean? 🤔
English