Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Vixie
8.8K posts

Vixie
@VixieTSQ
Software engineer and wannabe musician PFP: @he_xuan33 Lost in perverted sentimentality 37453521D3E125EA74E2C096B046FE9520F8F0E3
the Bay Area | she/they Katılım Temmuz 2016
622 Takip Edilen316 Takipçiler

@logicalityman @realsigridjin Uhhhh technically? Uniquely identifiable, but that doesn't mean anyone knows anything about the device other than that it exists
English

@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin With no NAT every device on the internet is uniquely identifiable. Governments love this idea.
English

@Insanegame2025 @ozeniken @flano_yuki It is a thing! But ipv6 was still designed with a NATless focus
English

@VixieTSQ @ozeniken @flano_yuki IPv6 Nat is a thing and a standard there's two versions of it nat 66 and a stateless version that is one to one npt
English

『Internet Protocol Version 8 (IPv8)』
ietf.org/archive/id/dra…
お、なんかIPv8という提案仕様がIETFに提出されてる
日本語

@Insanegame2025 @realsigridjin exactly! The format that the spec specifies could basically just be swapped out for something else and it would still largely be ipv6 lol
English

@VixieTSQ @realsigridjin Technically you can do it in decimal it's worse because has 16 sections instead of eight this is what IPv6 looks like in decimal 128.255.12.192.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1
English

@realsigridjin there're so many actual controversial technical differences you could argue about, but noooooo
I don't like how the address looks when it's formatted into text
it's the most consumer coded shit ever, it actually makes me way madder than it should
English

@realsigridjin is everyone's issue with ipv6 just that they don't like how the addresses are displayed? like a little bit of hexadecimal is that much of a deal breaker? it's quite petty
English
Vixie retweetledi

I still truly cannot comprehend why someone would want their integer width to be dependent on their compile target, other than for pointer sized integers
allisx86@allisx86
English

@ozeniken @flano_yuki IPV6 isn't getting adopted because getting rid of NAT would put network engineers out of the job
so obviously you gotta put NAT back in
English

@flano_yuki am i crazy or is this a straight up downgrade from ipv6, where before any 2 networks in the world, even intranets, didn't overlap. now they might so there's a reserved section for the NAT you'll have to do.

English

@pleasedburger @flano_yuki something about json being a normative reference in a IP layer standard just... hurts me inside
English

@VixieTSQ @flano_yuki this has to be some sort of elaborate evil prank
English

@kondonator I think odd numbered versions are reserved for experimental versions
English
Vixie retweetledi











