Kit Winder, CFA

3.2K posts

Kit Winder, CFA banner
Kit Winder, CFA

Kit Winder, CFA

@WinderKit

Senior Equity Analyst at ByteTree | CFA Charterholder | Focused on quality investing | Views my own, not investment advice.

London, England Beigetreten Mart 2019
471 Folgt543 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
“A great business at a fair price is superior to a fair business at a great price… The investment game always involves considering both quality and price, and the trick is to get more quality than you pay for in price. It’s just that simple." - Charlie Munger @ByteTree Quality is an investment research service which does exactly that. #Quality #Investing bytetree.com/bytetree-quali…
English
1
1
2
456
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
$FICO Earnings estimates vs share price. PE (fwd) is down from 78x to 12x...
Kit Winder, CFA tweet media
English
1
0
3
379
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
LVMH, $MC, similar to $RMS. ROIC surged after the pandemic, but has been fading back to normal ever since. LVMH's stock tracked ROIC trends more closely. Starting to form a bit of a "Mt Fuji"... New lows coming? FCF/EV yield is up to 6%... #LVMH #Investing
Kit Winder, CFA tweet media
English
0
0
1
295
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Hermes $RMS Return on Invested Capital peaked in 2023, and has declined for three years. But the stock took two years to accept that fact, and is only now starting to make new lows... Pre-covid sales multiple: 7x, post-covid peak: 20x. Current: 12x... Not a value trap but a... Quality trap? #Quality #Investing
Kit Winder, CFA tweet media
English
0
0
1
250
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Agriculture impact is near-immediate because of the timing of the « excursion » during planting season. It will also take months - years to feed through fully… #Iran #Investing
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86

Right now, in barns and equipment sheds across the American Midwest, farmers are making the most consequential decision of this war. Not generals. Not senators. Farmers. At $683 per ton urea, corn economics have collapsed. Nitrogen is the single largest input cost for corn production. At pre-war prices a farmer could justify 180 pounds per acre and expect a margin. At $683 the math breaks. Soybeans fix their own nitrogen from the atmosphere through root bacteria. They do not need the molecule trapped behind the Strait of Hormuz. The seed decision is being made this week across roughly 90 million acres of American cropland. Once the planter rolls into the field, the choice is irreversible. Corn seed in the ground stays corn. Soy seed stays soy. The acreage allocation locks in. USDA Prospective Plantings reports March 31. That report will tell the world how American agriculture responded to the Hormuz blockade. But the decisions it captures are being made now, in conversations between farmers and agronomists and seed dealers who are looking at nitrogen prices and making the rational economic choice: plant the crop that does not need the input you cannot afford. Every acre that shifts from corn to soybeans tightens the corn balance sheet for the rest of the year. Corn feeds livestock. Corn feeds ethanol. The Renewable Fuel Standard mandates 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol annually, consuming roughly 43 percent of the US corn crop regardless of price. That demand is inelastic. If acres shift and production falls while the mandate holds, corn prices spike. Feed costs spike. The protein cascade reverses. The US cattle herd sits at 86.2 million head, a 75-year low. Poultry and pork margins that were benefiting from cheap feed compress when corn crosses $5 per bushel. This is how a naval blockade 7,000 miles from Iowa reaches the American grocery shelf. Not through oil. Not through shipping. Through nitrogen. The farmer cannot afford the molecule. The molecule cannot transit the strait. The farmer plants soy instead. The corn supply tightens. The ethanol mandate consumes its fixed share. The remaining corn reprices. The feed reprices. The meat reprices. The grocery bill reprices. The decision is not political. It is arithmetic performed on a kitchen table by a person who needs to plant in three weeks and cannot wait for a ceasefire, an escort convoy, or an insurance normalisation that the Red Sea precedent says takes years. The deepest penetrator in the American arsenal cannot reach a sealed Iranian doctrinal packet. But the fertiliser price it failed to resolve is reaching every planting decision on 90 million acres of the most productive farmland on Earth. The war’s most irreversible consequence is not happening in a bunker. It is happening in a barn. And by the time USDA publishes the data on March 31, the seeds will already be in the ground. Full analysis in the link. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

English
0
0
0
77
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
It feels like there is a paradox where energy markets are holding back from a bigger price spike, because a bigger price spike would lead to a TACO, so a spike wouldn't last, but because the price spike hasn't come, the TACO doesn't come either... Kinda like... Catch TwentyTaco? (I think you made a point like this on the pod, that when oil prices dipped the US thought, oh cool, let's go again then...)
English
0
0
1
28
jacob l. shapiro
jacob l. shapiro@JacobShap·
which is why i have been thinking there's a week left, but each passing day i'm beginning to doubt that the WH sees the inflationary and domestic political fall out that is inevitably coming
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston

I think that a big part of the reason that people still think Trump will be in for the Iran War long haul is that they don’t appreciate how truly, insanely unhinged the energy market is about to get if this doesn’t end soon.

English
8
2
17
3.2K
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Why #Iran may be reluctant to come back to the negotiating table... 👇
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand

This is probably the most important article of the month: an op-ed by Oman's Foreign Minister, who mediated the talks between the U.S. and Iran, in which he writes that the U.S. "has lost control of its foreign policy" to Israel. He repeats that a deal was possible as an outcome of the talks (something confirmed by the UK's National Security Advisor, who also attended: x.com/i/status/20341…) and that the military strike by the U.S. and Israel was "a shock." Interestingly, given he is one of Iran's neighbors and given that Oman has been struck multiple times by Iran since the war began (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Iran…), he writes that "Iran’s retaliation against what it claims are American targets on the territory of its neighbours was an inevitable result" of the U.S.-Israeli attack. He describes it as "probably the only rational option available to the Iranian leadership." He says the war "endangers" the region's entire "economic model in which global sport, tourism, aviation and technology were to play an important role." He adds that "if this had not been anticipated by the architects of this war, that was surely a grave miscalculation." But, he adds, the "greatest miscalculation" of all for the U.S. "was allowing itself to be drawn into this war in the first place." In his view this was the doing of "Israel’s leadership" who "persuaded America that Iran had been so weakened by sanctions, internal divisions and the American-Israeli bombings of its nuclear sites last June, that an unconditional surrender would swiftly follow the initial assault and the assassination of the supreme leader." Obviously, this proved completely wrong, and the U.S. is now in a quagmire. He says that, given this, "America’s friends have a responsibility to tell the truth," which is that "there are two parties to this war who have nothing to gain from it," namely "Iran and America." He says that all of the U.S. interests in the region (end to nuclear proliferation, secure energy supply chains, investment opportunities) are "best achieved with Iran at peace." As he writes, "this is an uncomfortable truth to tell, because it involves indicating the extent to which America has lost control of its own foreign policy. But it must be told." He then proposes a couple of paths to get back to the negotiating table, although he recognizes how difficult it would be for Iran "to return to dialogue with an administration that twice switched abruptly from talks to bombing and assassination." That's perhaps the most profound damage Trump did during this entire episode: the complete discrediting of diplomacy. If Iran was taught anything, it is: don't negotiate with the U.S., it's a trap that will literally kill you. The great irony of the man who sold himself as a dealmaker is that he taught the world one thing: don't make deals with my country. Link to the article: economist.com/by-invitation/…

English
0
0
0
47
Kit Winder, CFA retweetet
Charlie Morris
Charlie Morris@AtlasPulse·
The main reason I launched BOLD (Bitcoin and Gold risk-weighted) was to diversify holding Gold. I have followed the yellow metal since the late 1990's, and when Bitcoin came along, it became clear that these assets are complimentary, and not in competition. Even after a sharp fall in Bitcoin since October, BOLD is still 3x gold over ten years. Gold is now tired after an extraordinary run. Bitcoin now carries the baton.
Charlie Morris tweet media
English
2
4
33
1.4K
Kit Winder, CFA retweetet
Charlie Morris
Charlie Morris@AtlasPulse·
What happened in 1974? The FTSE All share lost 80% in real terms over the decade, and the S&P, 60%. Oil shocks can be bad for your wealth. bytetree.com/research/2026/…
English
0
4
9
2.6K
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Have been quiet on the #Iran situ, as has been too unclear to me. However, based on my learnings over past few days, this is how I see the conflict now: Iran is already dominated militarily – America can do what it wants with almost no response at this point. The straits are closed. Iran can hardly close them more. So both sides can’t really escalate any further from here… Meanwhile, America (Trump) has stopped talking about regime change, and started panicking about the Straits. Iran has started making deals to let certain countries get oil through. So both sides are in fact pulling back from the most extreme position… We have had the shock, and everyone is sharing worst-case scenarios... While long-term economic impacts of this could still be understated, it feels as if the worst of it is over in the short term. The Houthis could shut the Red Sea, closing off an escape valve, but already it was a quiet weekend, and the reaction today suggests markets are starting to move on... Oil down, stocks up. $SPX #Investing #Oil
Kit Winder, CFA tweet media
English
0
0
0
56
T𑀣ᑏI 🇦🇱🇺🇸
The price of Spice rises by 10%, as intergalactic Guild shipping lanes are blocked by Fremen forces in response to the Harkonnens illegal attack on Arrakis. Arrakis, 10, 191AG, colorized
T𑀣ᑏI 🇦🇱🇺🇸 tweet media
English
132
1.9K
17.5K
484.6K
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Really nice and balanced. Those who think it would be a total disaster, or an obvious and significant saviour of the UK - are both wrong. As always, it’s somewhere in between. The question is how best to manage a declining asset - and stability of policy making is a key point. Our tax structure isn’t so much more punitive than Norway’s but we change it every year or two which is the most destructive bit. Stability and balance - not things you see a lot of in this debate!
English
1
1
11
1K
Kit Winder, CFA
Kit Winder, CFA@WinderKit·
Hi John, good question, a few points to try and provide some balance! Firstly this is based on LCOE which is a useful metric for some like for like comparisons between sources, but insufficient at a national policy making level as it ignores the system costs required for each technology, and arguably the externalities associated with each as well. Secondly, it nonetheless helps explain why the growth in solar is so high. Together with wind, they are taking market share faster than any other energy source in history (source: @AukeHoekstra). Physical constraints mean it can’t take over all energy in no time, but its growth is a reflection of its low lifetime cost. Thirdly, this isn’t true everywhere equally. Geography matters, horses for courses, build wind in Scotland and solar in Morocco. And while intermittency is manageable up to a decent share of most grid mixes, it becomes increasingly hard/costly to handle at very high shares. Especially if reliant on just one source. Solar and wind are somewhat anti-correlated which helps, but even that is not enough. So essentially, low cost on a standalone basis are driving exceptional growth in some places, but other system costs, geographical constrains, and resilience mean that 100% solar isn’t desirable at a global level. It’s all about the right mix in the right place, backed by better grids, batteries, and interconnections. Bonus point, it’s not just price, but profitability that matters. Without profits, it destroys value rather than creating it, and that slows private sector growth as it requires continuous external capital. Price is only one factor in the profitability equation.
English
2
0
4
315
Kit Winder, CFA retweetet
Charlie Morris
Charlie Morris@AtlasPulse·
BOLD ETF, Bitcoin and Gold risk-weighted, is approaching 4 years. Since launch in April 2022, the price of gold has surged. Bitcoin was doing well until last October, before a major correction. While BOLD is flat over six months, it has kept up with the best of both since launch. And with 46% in bitcoin, the highest weight ever, is well positioned should the asset returns reverse. 👇
Charlie Morris tweet media
English
2
4
19
1.3K
Marko Papic
Marko Papic@Geo_papic·
I know it won't come in time for the global economy to avoid a recession, but the world WILL eventually pry open Hormuz one way or another. Iran won't have this card indefinitely. This is not the White Mountains of Middle Earth... "The way is shut...." Even that was pried open.
GIF
English
20
5
153
69.1K