Brice

And yet you cite zero sources for any of these claims because they’re made up. Cmon mister educated man, you should know better than to make claims without citing your sources! And maybe you should take up the “racism” with the democrats funding the KKK then cbsnews.com/amp/news/south…

@bricef99 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv At least you admit you’re uneducated. That’s the first step. Lawyers looked at the bill and married women would lose the right to vote. Minorities have issues with documents because of racism. Did you know that was still a thing we non whites deal with?

Look, I hear you. I don't like gerrymandering either. Republicans control the senate, the house, have the presidency, and are 6-3 on SCOTUS. They could ban gerrymandering. They could've stopped this and all other gerrymanders If they wanted to. Ask yourself: "Why don't they?"

Ah yes the classic ad hominem attacks on my intelligence. Well, let me help you out as well. First of all, this does not reduce women’s right to vote. Even authors of the bill have confirmed that married woman who have changed their last names are not going to somehow lose their right to vote. Second, are you implying somehow that people of color are not capable of obtaining valid forms of identification of citizenship? Sounds a bit racist if you ask me. But what do I know, I’m just an uneducated pawn I guess 🤷🏻‍♂️

@bricef99 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv Let me help you since you don’t seem very educated. Republicans benefit from reducing the ability for women and people of color from voting. Republicans want this in the save act. Also illegal votes aren’t a thing that happens enough to care about.

@InnerFr4tB0y @LeadingReport I don’t think we are disagreeing about the legality of it. My entire argument is that there has to be some way to stop district court judges from dictating both policy as well as something as large as fundamental election changes.

@bricef99 @LeadingReport Well thays part of our court system and you gotta climb the ladder. Cant just go to the SC for everything. Being this is a state issue the court is well within thier power and right to do this.

JUST IN: Virginia Circuit Judge blocks new Congressional map after election.

@GGZ_71 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv That’s a strange admission that it benefits republicans if people who are illegally voting suddenly are not longer able to do it anymore 🤔

@bricef99 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv Limiting the number of people that can vote and rigging the system to benefit republicans.

@skscartoon Yeah, the reason is red states tend to be spineless cowards

Is there a reason why can't EVERY SINGLE red state does the same???

@InnerFr4tB0y @LeadingReport It is more “forgivable” but surely there has to be a better way of getting past the months if stalling to get a final verdict from the Supreme Court, or at the very least this shouldn’t be codified until it is heard by the Supreme Court imo.

@bricef99 @LeadingReport In this case however its a state court telling a state governor whats not constitutional. This in my opinion is more forgivable than a state judge dictating what the president can do foreign policy wise. See the difference?

@GGZ_71 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv What’s the save act about?

@bricef99 @lydiabackagain @WhickTv As soon as you admit that support for the save act cannot be conflated with this poll.

@brianander81 @LeadingReport Actually that sounds lovely since I’m a conservative

@bricef99 @LeadingReport I guess you really won’t be happy when SCOTUS flips 12 seats from blue to red in the south when it throws out racially based maps. Look it up.

@seanldunn @TwinkieGlidden @LeadingReport Which drags the process out for months until it gets appealed all the away to the Supreme Court where it is ultimately decided anyways. Why not just skip to that part?

@bricef99 @TwinkieGlidden @LeadingReport I mean, it's possible, albeit unlikely, that the defendants will let the ruling stand. But as it works it's way through the courts, each judge adds their opinion, and the lawyers get to add their arguments, at least until it can no longer be escalated.

@ST0LENWifi @LeadingReport I never liked them lol circuit judges blocking the president from military and immigration orders was and still is disguising

@bricef99 @LeadingReport oh now you dont like when the lower courts get involved... you cant pick and choose

This is day 112 of asking @LeaderJohnThune to pass the SAVE America Act.

@Airaxora Wait you guys are getting likes?

would y’all keep tweeting with 0 likes?

@TomSteyer Shouldn’t we be bringing anyone who breaks the law to justice? Or just ICE agents who are executing the lawful orders of immigration law?

As governor, I will defend California’s rights to protect our residents from authoritarian thugs. Let me be clear: If ICE agents and their leaders break the law, we will bring them to justice. It’s time to fight fire with fire.

@InnerFr4tB0y @LeadingReport That’s precisely my point, it SHOULDN’T

@bricef99 @LeadingReport Hey if a random lower court can stop the president at every turn what's wrong here?

@MachiaGOD @LeadingReport What if the vote of the people in one state allows slavery to be legal again?

@bricef99 @LeadingReport No court should ever override the vote of the people.

@SognoAmico @TwinkieGlidden @LeadingReport Right, which is why it’s really hard to implement and I get that. I just think it’s ridiculous this is the system we have to put up with.

@bricef99 @TwinkieGlidden @LeadingReport Like scotus doesn’t have enough to hear, without every other case going straight to the Supreme Court. That would be ridiculous. But your sentiment is correct.

@jedgar102 @LeadingReport That’s my whole point is they shouldn’t lol

@bricef99 @LeadingReport But circuit judges should block the orange man

@lydiabackagain @GGZ_71 @WhickTv That’s not my argument. I’m simply explaining how the system currently is. If you want to concede that you were wrong about your convictions and move on to talking about why we do or do not need the save act then we can do that.

@bricef99 @GGZ_71 @WhickTv Ok where is the proven voter fraud in those states?

@lydiabackagain @GGZ_71 @WhickTv Me when I move the goal posts

@bricef99 @GGZ_71 @WhickTv SAVE Act failed. That is a fact. It failed because it was unpopular. It will never become law. Even 1 legitemate vote thrown out as a result of searching for an instance of voter fraud is too many.

@HailingHogs @LeadingReport Right, I am aware of how the process works. I just think there has to be a more efficient way to decide these things instead of dragging it out for months at a time.

@bricef99 @LeadingReport They can’t fast track to the Supreme Court until there’s a judgment recorded. State cases can’t start in the Supreme Court. That’s why this happened.