LizaM

32.3K posts

LizaM

LizaM

@gotchatheregrin

Proud Latina-1st generation. Freelance photojournalist and Registered Nurse serving poor communities from Chicago to the Middle East. Huge wonderful family!!!

Chicago, IL Beigetreten Aralık 2020
644 Folgt1K Follower
LizaM retweetet
TRUMP SUPPORTER
TRUMP SUPPORTER@_Postive_Vibes·
🚨BOMBSHELL: In a stunning declaration, the Trump administration announced the "National Farm Security Action Plan" which bans future Chinese Communist Party-linked farmland purchases, aims to reclaim existing land with executive actions and imposes fines up to 25% of land value.
English
68
821
3.1K
38.9K
LizaM retweetet
Western Lensman
Western Lensman@WesternLensman·
Swalwell: This is another example of Trump going after his political opponents. Also Swalwell: When we retake power, we’re going after our political opponents.
English
284
2.4K
7.2K
67.6K
LizaM retweetet
@amuse
@amuse@amuse·
NATO: If Europe won’t allow us to use the bases we man and fund for their defense when we need them we ought to close them down and remove our troops from Europe. If they get attacked by Russia we can discuss whether or not we have the time to help.
English
254
1.7K
7.8K
96.1K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@StateDept I’m guessing Trump will get a good deal going for Iran too, should they decide to cooperate. Or not.
English
0
0
0
17
LizaM retweetet
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: For the first time in decades, Venezuela is now selling their oil in the global market at full market price. The money is coming back to Venezuela and being spent for the benefit of the Venezuelan people. 💪
English
374
4K
20.9K
191.5K
LizaM retweetet
2WAY
2WAY@2waytvapp·
“Part of the Rubio thing that’s so interesting to me is that it’s not just MAGA that’s excited about him,” says @MarkHalperin. “Donors are excited about him, and some members of Congress I've talked to. But also, Democrats are worried about him. I think Democrats look at beating JD Vance as not that tough, in part because he’s more closely now associated with the administration (even though, of course, Rubio’s in it, too). But they look at Rubio as formidable— a young, attractive Hispanic guy with great political skill. There are almost shades of George W. Bush, where people are just like, ‘whoa-- if this guy is the nominee, if you look at the electoral map, he could start to do some real damage.’” @marcorubio @JDVance
English
36
39
418
53.1K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@amuse Wait. Democrats are going to sue Trump to NOT pay TSA? Thats a good look. When Dems lose in November, it will be due to this faux pas.
English
0
0
0
7
@amuse
@amuse@amuse·
GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN: Democrats are preparing emergency litigation against Trump asking Democrat judges to prevent him from ‘illegally’ paying TSA agents.
English
1.3K
2.2K
4.4K
375K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@Jules31415 The Democrats are getting nothing but a lowering approval rating out of this stand-off.
English
0
0
0
5
Julia 🇺🇸
Julia 🇺🇸@Jules31415·
Democrat Rep. Jim Hines COMPLAINS that President Trump is "illegally paying" TSA agents: Margaret Brennan: "What did Democrats get out of this standoff?" Hines: "Yeah, well, um, the standoff is not done yet, right? The President is illegally paying, apparently, TSA agents." Of course Democrats like Hines are upset TSA agents are being paid and the long lines at airports will begin to dissipate. They're not on the side of the American people.
English
317
1.5K
6.3K
363.9K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@StateDept @Valspar111 Well, perhaps next time Spain needs help, they may have to beg.
English
0
0
3
64
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
🚨 SECRETARY RUBIO: If NATO is just about us defending Europe if they’re attacked, but them denying us basing rights when we need them, then that’s not a very good arrangement. That’s a hard one to stay engaged in and say this is good for the United States.
English
3.7K
4.6K
27.6K
1M
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@samstein I trust that the next Democratic administration will never set foot in it then? Or perhaps immediately tear it down?
English
0
0
0
4
Sam Stein
Sam Stein@samstein·
The New York Times takes an architectural look at the coming White House ballroom and finds there is a lot of ornamental stairs to no where and faux windows with bathroom stalls behind them
Sam Stein tweet media
English
2.5K
3.2K
22.1K
6.4M
LizaM retweetet
Immigration Accountability Project Action
Fact Check: FALSE. The Wong Kim Ark ruling established that the 14th Amendment applies to the children of LEGAL immigrants. That’s it. The Supreme Court has never ruled on whether it applies to the children of illegal aliens or foreign visitors.
Reuters@Reuters

Trump's executive order stripping birthright citizenship is headed to the Supreme Court, with the case drawing parallels to the 1898 Wong Kim Ark ruling, which established that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to nearly all born on US soil reut.rs/3Q6wtY2

English
57
727
2.9K
92K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@FoxNews @AsraNomani They tried that before and it did not work. Far less people attended this No Kings protest than the one last May. Interest is waning. Few are going to risk their jobs to strike.
English
0
0
0
16
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
🚨EXCLUSIVE: The #NoKings movement is unmasking a new alliance. Communists, socialists, and Democrat activists are joining forces to try to shut down America's economy. This anti-America campaign calls for a nationwide strike on May 1st— with the aim of shutting down all work, school, and commerce throughout the country. "There is only one solution—communist revolution." Read the full investigation by @AsraNomani here 👉 foxnews.com/politics/commu…
Fox News tweet media
English
875
764
1.8K
508.5K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
“An Obama appointed judge, just destroyed the democrats argument, that requiring a photo ID to vote, is Jim Crowe 2.0.”
JoeLange@JoeLang51440671

LEVERAGE. There is far more LEVERAGE being applied behind the scenes, than we know. This recent ruling in North Carolina by an “Obama” appointed judge, just handed a “gift” to Trump and the timing of the ruling, considering that the entire country is being focused on the SAVE ACT, is NOT a coincidence. “It took seven years, one reversed injunction, and an Obama-appointed judge to settle what most Americans already believed: requiring a photo to vote is not a civil rights violation.” Don’t miss, that this court fight has been going on for “seven years.” “This week, U.S. District Judge Loretta Biggs dropped a 134-page ruling upholding North Carolina's photo voter ID law and dismissing claims by the state NAACP and other left-wing civil rights organizations that Republicans designed the 2018 requirement to discriminate against black and Latino voters.  The decision is a huge victory for Republican legislative leaders, who have been litigating this question since the law passed, and it comes at a critical time, as the SAVE America Act is being obstructed by Democrats in the U.S. Senate.” The TIMING couldn’t be more perfect. An Obama appointed judge, just destroyed the democrats argument, that requiring a photo ID to vote, is Jim Crowe 2.0. Democrats have to be panicked, because the narrative just went completely against them. Why did she rule this way? “Biggs wrote in her order. “This case is not about whether North Carolina law will require that voters show photo identification when they go to the polls. That question was settled on November 6, 2018, when approximately 55% of North Carolina’s registered voters enshrined a photo voter identification requirement in the State Constitution.” “Thus, there will be photo voter ID in the State of North Carolina,” Biggs continued. “In our democratic system of government, we must accept the will of the majority of voters on this issue unless or until the people of North Carolina decide otherwise.” Power returning to the people. Not only did the people of North Carolina, vote to include this requirement in their state constitution, they did it back in 2018. This “new” law has been delayed implementation for seven years. But something else, forced her hand. Here’s where I believe, she was given a choice and leverage was applied. “Higher court rulings since the original lawsuit was filed left Biggs with one legally defensible path: defer to legislative good faith and apply established standards. The evidence, as she wrote, simply did not establish discriminatory intent under the legal framework she was bound to follow.” Higher courts have ALREADY decided that voter ID is not discriminatory. “Back in December 2019, Biggs had issued a preliminary injunction blocking the law for the 2020 election cycle, citing North Carolina's history of voter suppression and finding parts of the statute impermissibly motivated by discriminatory intent. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously reversed her. Now, after a full non-jury trial in spring 2024, she arrived at the same destination the appellate court had pointed her toward years earlier. The State Supreme Court also upheld the law in a separate case.” zerohedge.com/political/vote… She was “unanimously reversed.” This judge had ALREADY participated in trying to help the democrats steal the election in 2020, by blocking the law passed by the voters in 2018 that required voter ID. Trump won North Carolina in a close race, but that judge was now on notice. I believe she was forced into submission and that this decision came at the “perfect time.” It will now be used to throw fuel on the fire for the SAVE ACT. Right before Trump drops an EXECUTIVE ORDER, mandating it in every state. This Obama appointed judge, just helped Trump to “legally” defend the SAVE ACT across the country. Checkmate! Thank you for playing!

English
0
1
0
6
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@ABC Your graph gives you away. There were rare deaths in ICE custody under Biden, because Biden let everyone into the US without detention. Gargggg.
English
0
0
0
9
ABC News
ABC News@ABC·
Deaths of detainees in ICE custody surge under the second Trump administration, making it the most deadly period in recent years. abcnews.link/CcfmGZi
English
67
29
55
23.5K
LizaM
LizaM@gotchatheregrin·
@washingtonpost There is no way a clarification of the 14th amendment would be retroactive. It’s unlikely that SCOTUS would rule to strip thousands of their citizenship. It would apply henceforth.
English
0
0
0
4
The Washington Post
The Washington Post@washingtonpost·
The Trump administration argues the 14th Amendment does not apply to people in the country illegally or on temporary visas. If the Supreme Court agrees, it could render hundreds of thousands of children born to immigrant parents stateless. wapo.st/4bU0d1Q
English
2.2K
350
2.6K
447.7K
LizaM retweetet
Mayra Yazdari
Mayra Yazdari@MayraYazdari·
Nonstop coverage for the #nokings protests ZERO covrage of the pro-Iranian, pro-Trump rally in Washington DC These are the patriots they don’t want you to see!! 👇👇 10s of 1000s of Iranian-Americans marched in DC to be the voice of Iranians whose voices r silenced inside #Iran
English
36
361
754
13.5K