John Behles

computer, what is sanctions

@welkerlaw @buccocapital Bro. I am not arguing with you about this. I don't give a shit. You know damned well this is going to clog the courts and there is zero chance judges are going to put up with it. Lack of knowledge of the law is no excuse. Paper pushing is the lowest level of legal practice.

@jmbehles @buccocapital A lot of pro se litigants have: 1) legitimate grievances, even if not framed correctly 2) are judgment proof LLMs will improve their success rates.

We will have more lawyers because AI zeroes the friction of suing people It’s going to unambiguously bad for society and I don’t really know what the solution is

@SMB_Attorney That's the bitch of democratization. We are about to see the unleashing of massive amounts of frivolous lawsuits on the courts, the likes we have never seen before. Courts will have to be the gate keepers here.

If you think unprecedented access to legal tools will reduce your dependency on lawyers, you’re looking at it backwards. Guess who else has access? People who hate you and want to extract money from you. Are you going to DIY all of that while running a business and raising kids? Nope. You’re going to call your lawyer and say, “Deal with this, please? I don’t have time for this!” and they’re going to use the new tools. Costs will go down, but lawyer work will explode. Do you get it now??

@andrewarruda Lot's of cases are paywalled. No different than PACER.

that the full breadth and depth of citable, current law is not available by API is profoundly concerning

@tomweedlaw Some lawyers do not fit under this umbrella. Thank you for reminding me.

@jmbehles not really, I never call my insurance policy names and say they suck. But lawyers got that scapegoat factor with an insurance wrapper for sure.

People hire lawyers for the same reason they buy insurance policies.

@writeclimbrun Billed does not mean collected

law math is telling myself that I billed several additional hours this weekend so I can buy myself a little toy.

@CoffeeBlackMD @Papa_Heme Exactly. Our entire society is based on CYA

That's true but my comment was really more of people wouldn't want because of cost, but then would be also mad if you missed something that is a potential but low probability. So. We check every day for that reason. We do not live in a culture that will accept something missed that way.

If patients had to pay out of pocket for all the bloodwork done during a hospital stay I’m pretty sure they would refuse over 90% of it. At least I would.

If you don't enjoy this part of the law, you may want to consider other employment opportunities.

@CoffeeBlackMD @hubermanlab @TakeWeightOffMD @Brady_H Until Huberutide hits the market.

@hubermanlab @TakeWeightOffMD @Brady_H It’s always checkmate man. You’re like an interested nerd (it’s a compliment) and you just post about things that you get into. And the cynics always project their stuff. It’s exhausting.

I blame @hubermanlab

@CoffeeBlackMD @Papa_Heme 99% of the issue is that the lab "prices" are not aligned with the actual COGs of the lab. $5 lipid panel you can get outpatient that supposedly costs the non-profit hospital $500 to run.

@Papa_Heme I’d be happy enough if the standard of care wasn’t daily labs but who’s going to be the brave souls to start that.

@lawheroezV2 Why they are alive and posting all over this platform?

We need to build an anti-tech bro “lawyers mark up NDA’s at $1000/hr “moron bot.

@ckieser13 @mdwstfrontierAI LLMs cannot decipher dicta from holdings. Hell tons of human lawyers can't. The division between the two isn't even apparent to the judge sometimes

@mdwstfrontierAI Unfortunately a big problem in law since opinions will often state three different positions and only one of them is the holding!

Here's an example of a classic Westlaw AI hallucination. State v. Sweat doesn't actually hold that the Court of Appeals got it wrong by rendering a provision "meaningless surplusage." It affirmed the CoA. The quote appears in the Court's description of the state's arguments.

@RobertFreundLaw @_The_Prophet__ @pangramlabs At some point the integrations will mimic human interaction with typing speed, backspaces, typo fixes. These tools are good for a short time but will be outsmarted.

@_The_Prophet__ @pangramlabs Will save you the suspense

⚡️A first year lawyer at a big firm bills $400 an hour to redline NDAs. That’s the first task you get as a junior associate. You sit in an office at 11pm marking up contracts, catching inconsistencies, flagging risk language, suggesting revisions. It’s tedious. It’s high volume. It’s how firms justify $200k starting salaries because clients pay the bill. Claude just did it in the sidebar. With tracked changes. In the format partners already review. At a cost of essentially nothing. The entire pyramid of professional services is built on junior people doing high volume routine cognitive work at high billing rates to fund the partnership structure above them. That pyramid just lost its base. If Claude can redline an NDA, it can redline a lease. A licensing agreement. An employment contract. A merger agreement. The complexity varies but the task structure is identical. Read the document. Identify risk. Suggest revisions. Show your work. Law is just the visible example. The same thing is happening to consulting. To accounting. To financial analysis. Every profession where junior people are paid to process documents, identify patterns, and produce written output just watched their entry level job description appear in a product demo. The tracked changes feature is what makes this irreversible. Anthropic didn’t build a tool that generates documents you then have to manually compare. They built a tool that edits your document and shows the diff. That’s the entire workflow of professional document review compressed into a sidebar interaction. The senior person doesn’t change their process at all. They still review tracked changes. They just don’t need the junior person to produce them anymore.

@RobertFreundLaw Just say "its market". Covers a multitude of sins. Hey why did you mark up this section that way? Uhhhh...it's market bro. Don't you use market provisions. But tell me why... It's market bro.

The easiest tell for me has been when the other party can’t coherently explain why they need/want the changes they’re demanding, or the explanation makes no sense in context.

@trq212 I don't want any more features. Fix basic shit.

New in Claude Code: /ultraplan Claude builds an implementation plan for you on the web. You can read it and edit it, then run the plan on the web or back in your terminal. Available now in preview for all users with CC on the web enabled.

@AnthropicAI Care to explain?

Endotoxin content is the boogeyman pharma and the FDA will use. Manufacturers are using synthetically produced peptides. Yes, there are opportunities for contamination, but that is the risk you take on any injectable. Compound pharmacies are not exempt from LPS. Peptide buyers do not want your help. Thanks but no thanks.