James Sin🇮🇹🇺🇸

Recess Appointments: Bill Clinton: 139 George W. Bush: 171 Barack Obama: 32 Donald Trump: 0 This is because @LeaderJohnThune is BLOCKING President Trump.

We retracted NOTHING, and nothing that @HanneReports and I have published has been “debunked.” Oh, sure … MSM outlets, @FBI “sources,” and members of the Former Agents Group (F.A.G.s) have all said, “Nuh-uh,” but that isn’t “debunking.” That’s not doing the work themselves, and showing different results. No one has yet done that. They are still only parroting the intel community’s narrative — told through “sources” who also haven’t done the work — delivering the message they’ve been assigned to spread. The muzzle has been discarded. There is no longer a paycheck-imposed gag order. Joe and I are now free to tell all. Announcements coming soon.

VINDICATION: The FBI covered up a current CIA employee's failed polygraph failure to two SIMPLE questions: "Did you place those pipe bombs?" "Did you place those pipe bombs that evening?" @FBIDirectorKash and @dbongino have some 'splaining to do.

🚨J6 Video You've Never Seen🚨 The much-feared media company-killing law firm, Clare Locke, that represents former @CapitolPolice officer and current @CIA asset Shauni Kerkhoff -- (Oh, let's be real ... they represent the CIA) -- sent a demand/preservation letter to @theblaze, me, and @HanneReports. Basically, a threat of a defamation lawsuit. In that letter, they stated: "Blaze Media’s analysis was also factually flawed. Ms. Kerkhoff’s 2015 soccer injury did not give her a 'slight limp' from which any reasonable 'analyst' could link her to the bombing suspect. Ms. Kerkhoff has fully recovered from her injury. In the interim, she has run multiple marathons." Given that Clare Locke has dedicated resources to monitoring every word we write and every one of our media appearances, they must know we have hours of video of Ms. Kerkhoff's unusual "circumduction gait." (A kind of limp.) Hours of video we've harvested from Capitol CCTV of her as a Capitol Police officer on January 5 and 6, 2021, and from her short professional soccer career. Almost all of which is readily available to any member of the public, press, or one of the law firm's taxpayer-funded paralegals. (Routed through some dark money conduit, foundation, or NGO. Kerkhoff cannot afford an $1,800 per hour law firm, well-known for not taking defamation cases on contingency.) Is Clare Locke incompetently representing their client, Ms. Kerkhoff (er ... CIA) -- by that easily disproved assertion -- or were they just trying to scare The Blaze into a quick settlement before their client would have to face the harsh reality of trial discovery? As for Ms. Kerkhoff being a marathon runner, we already knew that. Despite their best efforts to scrub her former internet history, we'd already captured many photos of her participation in marathon events from deep web scrapes. The most interesting little nugget about that is: The until-recently Congressional Liaison to The FBI, Marshall Yates, once told me -- while reviewing video of the J6 pipe bomber in the office of his former employer, @RepThomasMassie -- "We need to be looking for a marathon runner." Why? Because of distinct physical traits that are characteristic of marathon runners and exhibited by the bomber while on that 44-minute trek around the DNC and RNC on the night of J5. (More on that, later.) Clare Locke says, "No limp." Video evidence says otherwise. Joe and I launch our new endeavor on Monday -- free of corporate media censorship -- where we'll finally be able to tell the whole story and show you the videos @FBI never wanted you to see.

A couple of quick and important notes on the sh*tstorm @theblaze initiated today. Please read carefully: 1 - @glennbeck had nothing to do with either my hiring or firing. He hasn’t owned the Blaze for quite some time. In fact, the leadership who fired me are the ones Glenn called “wusses” during a broadcast last year. They are also probably responsible for his near complete separation from the company he founded. 2 - My prohibition from appearing on @blazetv shows had nothing to do with the show hosts. They have all been overwhelmingly gracious and welcoming to me. @SaraGonzalesTX, @SteveDeaceShow, @MattKibbe, @PatUnleashed, @StuDoesAmerica, etc — including their producers, crews, and sidekicks — were the highlight of my time at the Blaze. I wish them nothing but success and prosperity into the future. 3 - Ditto for all the other editors, writers, engineers, video gurus, hair and makeup artists, security team, accountants, and janitors. They all made my time at the Blaze a very special 2.5+ years. I’ll miss them all. The simple fact behind our decision to part ways was a fundamental difference in how the sides felt about how to handle the larger J6 pipe bomb story. I thought we were going to do this amicably and leave doors open for future projects together. Right up until the very eve of my termination, they were still trying to get me to reconsider, stay, and play to their rules. I couldn’t do that. Any other version of events told or to be told is an absolute falsehood.

So, this is how it is. This carefully crafted language is the kind of lawyerly deception we expect from those with no moral guiding star. (FWIW … @theblaze CEO is a lawyer.) At its very heart though, the post I’m responding to is a calculated deception. I have never asked for or expected any of my work for The Blaze to be exempt from editorial review. NEVER. NOT ONCE. In fact, my last piece written for The Blaze, with @hannereports, was subjected to eleven days of review from filing to publication. It went through rigorous editorial and legal review. After it was published by the editor in chief, it was almost immediately taken off the front page and buried behind the paywall … with “comments” turned off. Our last several articles have been subjected to deliberate in-house reach suppression and no promotion on social media or from BlazeTV hosts. So fearful Blaze executives have become that our work elicits people to think about and/or speak of that name which should not be uttered. That’s the regime we’ve been subjected to since our November 8 story revealing the identity of the J6 pipe bomber, after which I was immediately forbidden to do any interviews, on ANY topic, even on @BlazeTV programs. Even about articles and subject matter unrelated to that name which should not be uttered, or that had cleared editorial review. This deception is nuanced. They will now respond and contend that all my speech is subject to editorial review. TV, podcasts, social media, and the Blaze website. But the lede, as most TL;DR people will read and understand it, is that I no longer wanted to have my work subject to rigorous editorial and legal review. I categorically reject false that assertion. Even our November 8 article — ultimately retracted by The Blaze — went through 4-5 different editors, legal, and executive suite review before its publication. Joe and I did our jobs, and THEY ALL signed off on the story. They could have killed it before publication. They’ve spiked stories of ours before and since November 8. It happens. I eventually reached my moral, spiritual, emotional, psychological, and even physical end to accepting the censorship about a particularly “difficult subject.” In fact, in my final conference call with attorneys and other Blaze leadership, the company’s in-house counsel instructed me to limit my social media use to only “posting about your children and butterflies.” That was neither the beginning of the end, or the final straw, but from that point forward it only required some unknown future trigger to push me past my limit of being able to refrain from telling the whole truth about the January 6 pipe bomber. Truths and a “difficult subject” The Blaze does in fact fear covering. Last week there was such a trigger. The final straw. I then informed my editor in chief that I could no longer work under “the post November 8 censorship regime.” I NEVER said I wanted my work exempt from editorial review. We simply reached cross purposes in our employee/employer relationship. No biggie. It happens. But I’ll not allow that public misrepresentation from Blaze management to go unchallenged. FWIW … The old motto for The Blaze used to be, “The Truth Lives Here.” I’ll let you be the judge of that.