钱途哥|疯狂赚钱实验室

很多人被暂停 X 创作收益大概率是以下原因： 1. 自动化死穴：用 AI 机器人批量评论，或发 AI 内容、广告没按要求标注 2. 网络风控：频繁切 IP，节点质量低（特别是万人骑的机场） 3. 恶意刷量：刷粉丝、刷互动，高频关注/取关/点赞/转发 4. 低质内容：抄袭、搬运、内容同质化，或发色情擦边 5. 抱团连坐：非自然互关，或者进群搞低质的互赞、互评、互推 6. 合规硬伤：近期改名触发二次审核，或 Stripe 提现后台税务表单过期 7. 纯属平台误杀，不排除AI误伤，可以申诉 注意：即使被暂停，只要申诉通过，之前的收益照发，不会清除！没必要因为这个停更。 看文字不过瘾，可以看看这篇YouTube视频：youtu.be/5iyDYIgnUtA?si… 几点自救/实用建议： 网络要稳：用稳定、高质量的独立/住宅 IP，尽量别乱切换节点。这个视频可以看看youtube.com/watch?v=jz_ne6… 行为要真：多发原创，保持正常人的自然互动，一定不要任何刷量和自动化脚本。 自查自纠：被暂停了先看邮件，把最近一个月可能擦边、违规或者互赞的垃圾推文全删了再提交申诉。 申诉话术：准备好材料，自证是 100% 手工操作的真人肉身创作者。 好运，Bro

第三天 单纯说数据还行 但是盲目追求数据价值不大 新的X做成一个内容垂直号 还需要垂直的足够的基础内容做填充 计划最近仅仅围绕内容做建设 不计划瞎几把忙活了

@dsycyn 哈哈，可以的

@labsmmm 借楼互动了 长时间在线 互动必回

很多人被暂停 X 创作收益大概率是以下原因： 1. 自动化死穴：用 AI 机器人批量评论，或发 AI 内容、广告没按要求标注 2. 网络风控：频繁切 IP，节点质量低（特别是万人骑的机场） 3. 恶意刷量：刷粉丝、刷互动，高频关注/取关/点赞/转发 4. 低质内容：抄袭、搬运、内容同质化，或发色情擦边 5. 抱团连坐：非自然互关，或者进群搞低质的互赞、互评、互推 6. 合规硬伤：近期改名触发二次审核，或 Stripe 提现后台税务表单过期 7. 纯属平台误杀，不排除AI误伤，可以申诉 注意：即使被暂停，只要申诉通过，之前的收益照发，不会清除！没必要因为这个停更。 看文字不过瘾，可以看看这篇YouTube视频：youtu.be/5iyDYIgnUtA?si… 几点自救/实用建议： 网络要稳：用稳定、高质量的独立/住宅 IP，尽量别乱切换节点。这个视频可以看看youtube.com/watch?v=jz_ne6… 行为要真：多发原创，保持正常人的自然互动，一定不要任何刷量和自动化脚本。 自查自纠：被暂停了先看邮件，把最近一个月可能擦边、违规或者互赞的垃圾推文全删了再提交申诉。 申诉话术：准备好材料，自证是 100% 手工操作的真人肉身创作者。 好运，Bro

@Arvinral 用的什麼？

妈的，我的VPN也炸了。 这下完了……

@e5ogv 今天回关满了，被限制了。我会第一时间回关你

@labsmmm 那你为什么不和我交朋友呢？我很活跃

听说粉丝超过一万的，都是人中龙凤😎

@e5ogv 刚刚觉醒了，已回

@KingQiang_ 确实

@labsmmm 没错，榨汁机的干活难搞

朴素点 不搞创作者收入了 蓝v互关，漏了🙋‍，留言必回 市场行情不好，和有趣的伙伴们互动起来 #蓝V互关

@wangyong1985 美区PayPal吗？

天塌了，我的账户被限制！ 就算X上岸，也收不到款， 难搞。

@caozhen672 @lb377204209 公寓楼没价值

@lb377204209 想不到谁会去大量的买二手房，很多房子20年后破乱不堪了！

国内99%的普通人都可以放弃躺平了，新房没有任何参考意义，后续只是有钱人改善的产品。至于二手房，会有大放水营造短暂繁荣后，大额增值税收取锁死交易。还是哪句话，现阶段，没有深层次的改革，普通人永无出头之日，通缩是死，通胀起码还能缓解疼痛，反正都要死，干嘛不拖一拖呢？普通人也是一样，买房最后剩下一堆砖头，不买房剩下一堆纸。

@visegrad24 为你们开心 我们是职业观众

Norway releases its World Cup team photo 🇳🇴

@jason_chen998 哈哈，这个确实冷知识 之前我也是觉得奇怪，动则那么多钱，怎么舍得赔； 后才查了下才知道，他们的执法责任险保险公司都给他们计算的非常明白了，根据工种，区域，年龄和性格，保费都有差异。貌似不贵，记得200左右

经常刷视频看到美国动不动就有哪个警察因为过度执法或者开枪误伤，被诉讼后赔偿给被害人上千万美金，相信你之前和我一样都很好奇难道警察局这么有钱吗几千万随手就能拿出来？分享个热知识，实际上美国的警察都会专门购买执法保险，专门针对于警察在执法过程中可能面临的民事索赔，所以这些钱实际上都是保险公司赔给被害人的，而保险公司会根据警种、工龄等等因素制定每年100到400美金的保费。

@W0LF0FCRYPT0 熊市就是加密圈的成人礼 必须被操到怀疑人生才能毕业 活下来的 下轮牛市财务自由 熬不过去的 就是这波的燃料 熊市不杀人 只会燃烧没有信仰的燃料 你说呢 bro

It’s a rite of passage in crypto that you have to lose everything at some point in a brutal bear market that seems to only get much worse everyday But after it comes a period of bountifulness & bullish momentum that changes your life forever & makes you millions of dollars The bear market is the biggest opportunity to change your life with crypto But only if you can get through it first.

@MMMusol 该赚钱的时候好好赚钱 冷静后就熊了

@labsmmm 希望大家能更冷静一些吧

目前绿的谐波公司市值577亿，其实我个人是比较谨慎的 我们按未来10年，一切都如最好的预期发展： 2025年中国工业机器人77万台，未来10年增长至165万台，工业机器人年产量 × 3.5台谐波/台=国内新增谐波需求，绿的谐波国内市占率取30%（保守），谐波减速器均价按1150 元/台。 公司的收入大致80亿，净利润12亿，10年后的净利润对应今天的市值，动态市盈率依旧高达50倍，投资回报率是不太好的。 还有一点，未来10年企业的变量也不会一成不变，竞争方面也有很大的问题。 最近几年实际上谐波减速器的价格在下降，毛利率在走低的。 还有一点我也在想：我们真的需要那么多人形机器人吗，一切都是未知数。

@OTC_BNBOKBHT ZEC的玩法花样多 继续看它跳舞

漏洞虽然是用AI检测出来的，利用漏洞增发ZEC多少，也是无法检测的伪造ZEC。 ZEC隐私得非常好，连伪造的都无法确认真假。 Arthur Hayes并发文称已清仓 ZEC 持仓。Hayes 表示，尽管恶意铸币的可能性极低，但无法通过密码学方法正式证明其不可能。保护隐私免受 AI、政府和大型科技公司侵害的说法要求的是完美无缺，而不是概率极低。他表示，若后续假设被证伪，不排除以更低价格重新买入。

@captain_kent @RallyOnChain Bro，故事性挺强 你是怎么在币圈赚钱的？

我曾是体制关键岗位负责人，亲眼见了太多人间疾苦，让我抑郁导致辞职。后来在西藏洗礼期间，手中股票暴涨了3倍，让我意识到只有赚更多钱，才能实现意识自由。于是我一头扎进了币圈，这便是我故事的开始。现在我很享受在 X 上和大家吹牛，也因此发现了 @RallyOnChain 这个平台，它的活动唤醒了我的内心。

@erchenlu1 趋利性会让加密叙事不断迭代的 加密圈在当下依然是想象空间最大， 也是普通人翻身的最佳赛道

B圈未来要面临的几个现实问题： 1. 创始人突然不干了，走了 2. 超级AI，比如mythos, 直接发现了重大bug, 价格会直接腰斩，类似于前12名的项目 Zcash 最近发现大bug, 一天就跌了40%+ 3. 新人（韭菜）越来越少的进来 4. 越来越多的老人跳船去美股，一去不复返。 5. 存活的人越来越少，归零的人越来越多（赌博的结局）。

@MOSSADil @elonmusk AI的到来让各领域垂直内容变的成本无限接近于零； 这个冲击让X的价值评定系统紊乱 X的系统也很懵逼 X的价值可能在重塑 它的算法也在重新建立中 期待王者归来

🧵 IS X GOING BACKWARDS? @elonmusk For most of its existence, X (formerly Twitter) was built on a very simple social contract. If I chose to follow you, I would see what you posted. Not every post. Not instantly. Not without interruption. But generally speaking, the platform respected the relationship between creators and their followers. That was the entire point. People came to X to exchange ideas, follow breaking news, participate in public conversations, and build communities around shared interests. It was not Instagram. It was not TikTok. It was not YouTube. It was something different. The platform's value came from information. A journalist could break a story. A politician could make an announcement. A soldier could post an update from the battlefield. A citizen could share something happening in real time. The best content was not necessarily the most creative. It was the most relevant. Then monetization entered the picture. In theory, monetization was supposed to reward active users and encourage people to contribute more content. There is nothing inherently wrong with that idea. The problem is that incentives change behavior. Some users began stealing content. Others turned their accounts into engagement farms. Some posted intentionally misleading material designed solely to provoke reactions. Rage became a business model. But instead of addressing those bad actors directly, X appears to have changed the platform itself. The result is that X is no longer optimizing for information. It is optimizing for engagement. And those are not the same thing. A breaking news report about an important event may receive little engagement because there is nothing to argue about. The information is simply useful. Meanwhile, a provocative post about race, religion, politics, or culture can generate thousands of comments, arguments, quote posts, and reactions. The algorithm interprets that engagement as value. As a result, the platform increasingly rewards controversy over information. This creates a perverse outcome. The very content that brought people to X in the first place is often suppressed, while the content that generates outrage receives massive amplification. A straightforward news report may receive 10,000 views. A post designed to start a fight may receive 2 million. The message is clear: The platform values reactions more than information. That may produce short-term engagement metrics, but it undermines the reason many people joined X in the first place. The problem becomes even worse when combined with the current monetization system. Today, creators are seeing a fraction of the revenue they once received. At the same time, many report significant reductions in reach. The incentives that once encouraged news gathering, reporting, and consistent posting are disappearing. People are posting less because the rewards have diminished. Users are seeing less because the algorithm has become more selective. And followers increasingly discover that clicking "Follow" does not actually mean they will see the accounts they chose to follow. That is perhaps the biggest issue of all. The platform has quietly broken the relationship between creators and their audiences. I have more than a million followers. When a post reaches only a tiny percentage of those followers, it raises an obvious question: What exactly does the Follow button mean anymore? If someone explicitly chooses to follow an account, why should an algorithm be allowed to override that decision? The follower made a choice. The platform should respect it. Instead, X increasingly behaves as though it knows better than its users. The irony is that X seems to be chasing a future that already belongs to someone else. If people want algorithmically amplified original content, they already have TikTok. If they want highly visual influencer content, they already have Instagram. If they want long-form video, they already have YouTube.

@aleabitoreddit 白毛姐，你是大赢家。 市场会因为你波动而波动