michelle b. hoffmann

486 posts

michelle b. hoffmann banner
michelle b. hoffmann

michelle b. hoffmann

@mihoffmann

Proud Berkeley MCB alum, Chicagoland biotech believer, information hound, will go anywhere for good soft serve

Chicago, Il Beigetreten Ocak 2010
1.3K Folgt249 Follower
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Carl Quintanilla
Carl Quintanilla@carlquintanilla·
Four-byline alert: 🚨 “.. A broker for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, according to three people familiar ..” @FT ft.com/content/744ea8…
Carl Quintanilla tweet media
English
267
2.2K
4.7K
577.9K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Pearl Freier
Pearl Freier@PearlF·
An update on China increasing investment in scientists while US govt is freezing or delaying funding: An American RNA biologist & biotech startup founder (@NucleateHQ finalist) posted on LI that a recruiter contacted her w/offer 2 start a lab in China as SBIR is frozen since 9/25
Pearl Freier tweet media
English
0
7
22
10.8K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych
Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych@Nick_Carmody·
A newly relevant thread that uses Trump's 1st Penatagon briefing as a backdrop..... ....and analyzes how Trump's disorders relegate him to a state of permanent ignorance, & cause him to aggressively act, often w/detrimental consequences, in order to avoid triggering his inadequacies.
Nick Carmody JD, MS Psych@Nick_Carmody

@MelissaJPeltier @AlexKahill @BaylessMarilyn @TomJChicago @JohnMTalmadgeMD 2) Since Trump lives in an alternate reality, revises history, & is pathologically dishonest…..it doesn’t matter if he makes changes that are incredibly destructive b/c he’s going to sell the change as a brilliant move, and then deny & lie about the detrimental consequences. 3/

English
0
7
16
1.7K
michelle b. hoffmann
michelle b. hoffmann@mihoffmann·
@MaziyarPanahi @ylecun Biotech investors don’t have the timelines for innovation that the government does. Federal funds are usually for discovery and biotechs are to develop applications. You can’t have startups without that type of foundation
English
0
0
0
20
Maziyar PANAHI
Maziyar PANAHI@MaziyarPanahi·
@ylecun don’t we have more bio research labs by private companies and more biotech startups today than ten years ago? genuinely asking, i would prefer scientists to work in those labs with proper resources and good compensation than staying public
English
3
0
3
1.3K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Chris Murphy 🟧
Chris Murphy 🟧@ChrisMurphyCT·
We told you the Venezuela invasion was just corruption. It took one whole week to get the proof. Trump took Venezuela's oil at gunpoint, and gave it to one of his biggest campaign donors. 1/ But when you learn the details, it's even worse. A short🧵on this corruption story.
Chris Murphy 🟧 tweet media
English
875
10.8K
21K
1M
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Jake Scott, MD
Jake Scott, MD@jakescottMD·
Kennedy’s response is worth fact-checking. The death figure is wrong. Pre-vaccine, rotavirus killed an estimated 20-60 American children annually, not 3. He understated mortality by a factor of 10-20. He dodged the actual question. The reporter asked about hospitalizations. Kennedy pivoted to deaths because 55,000-70,000 hospitalizations per year, plus 200,000 ER visits and 400,000 outpatient visits, is harder to wave away. Preventing those admissions is preventing harm. The vaccine he’s referencing hasn’t been used in 26 years. When Kennedy says a rotavirus vaccine “was withdrawn” for intussusception, he’s talking about RotaShield, pulled from the market in 1999. The vaccines children receive today (RotaTeq, Rotarix) are different products, developed specifically to address that safety signal, and tested in trials of over 60,000 infants each before approval. The fact that RotaShield was withdrawn is evidence the safety system works, not an argument against the current vaccines. The intussusception math still favors vaccination. Current vaccines carry a small, real risk: roughly 1 excess case per 20,000 to 100,000 infants, mostly within a week of doses 1 or 2. For every excess case, we prevent 300-1,500 hospitalizations. Clinicians counsel families on this tradeoff. It’s not hidden. Kennedy may have smiled because he thought he won. Whether he was right is a different question.
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox

CBS reporter runs straight into a wall as RFK Jr. dismantles her rotavirus fearmongering. RFK Jr.’s smile at the end says it all. He clearly won this exchange. REPORTER: “Before [the rotavirus] vaccine went into use, there were thousands of kids who were hospitalized every year … Do you really want to go back to those times?” KENNEDY: “Well, Rotavirus killed approximately three children a year [in the US]. And I think since the rotavirus vaccine has been recommended, that’s dropped around two children a year. And you’re giving 3 million vaccines. And so to prevent one death, you have to give—” REPORTER INTERRUPTS: “Thousands of hospitalizations, which is serious. Right?” KENNEDY: “Well, if you’re giving 3 million vaccines to prevent one death, then you have to make sure that the vaccines are not causing any damage. And various rotavirus vaccines have been linked to very, very serious and deadly diseases, including intussusception (when one part of the intestine slides into another like a telescope).” REPORTER: “Okay, well, I don’t know that that’s the scientific consensus about the vaccine.” KENNEDY: “It was actually withdrawn because of that.” *Kennedy smiles*

English
54
312
1.2K
104.8K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Peter Baker
Peter Baker@peterbakernyt·
Jack Smith in newly released testimony: "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power." @GlennThrush nytimes.com/2025/12/31/us/…
English
258
1.4K
3.5K
69.6K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Jonathan Karl
Jonathan Karl@jonkarl·
Jack Smith spent more than 8 hours answering questions in a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17. It’s worth watching — you can see why Smith wanted to testify publicly — and why the committee waited until New Year’s Eve to release the video. youtu.be/lR-bhPzQYUE?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
482
4.4K
9.1K
420.4K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Silvi Rouskin
Silvi Rouskin@silvirouskin·
PLEASE RETWEET @Delta is the most disappointing flying experience in my life. I paid extra $300 to change my direct flight to a connecting flight so I can get my dog from dog-care and @delta CANCELED my connecting flight to Boston. Now I’m stuck at Detroit airport OVERNIGHT and @Delta said they will NOT reimburse me at all - not even for hotel. Not to mention extra day of dog care and that I don’t get to take my dog home. This is what @Delta is doing to PEOPLE FOR CHRISTMAS!!!
English
7
15
118
24K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Ro Khanna
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna·
Let's be clear. The DSCC leaked this to try to destroy Platner the day their hand-picked candidate entered the race. I respect Platner's journey & the man he is today. I reject the politics of personal destruction. I stand by my endorsement. I won't cower to the establishment.
Ryan Grim@ryangrim

Whether you like Platner or not he is dead right about the remedy for alienation and anger being community and purpose. If being angry as a young man disqualifies you from running for office later as a Democrat, Dems will have basically no men running

English
636
1.5K
15.2K
1.3M
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Becca Willett
Becca Willett@WillettBecca·
Scientific research fuels our economy and improves all our lives.
English
1
1
2
248
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Betsey Stevenson
Betsey Stevenson@BetseyStevenson·
My fear is that ordinary Americans are not experiencing the firing of an experienced, non-partisan, leader of a statistical agency as the major earthquake for the United States that it is.
English
1K
3.5K
21.3K
1.2M
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
Cullen Roche
Cullen Roche@cullenroche·
Let's talk a little about the claims of "manipulation" here because I think there's a lot of misunderstanding about how this works. The BLS employment data comes from surveys designed to offer a timely, though imperfect, snapshot of labor market conditions. By nature, surveys involve estimation and are subject to revision as more comprehensive data becomes available. The most accurate and complete employment data comes from the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), which is based on actual payroll tax filings submitted by virtually all employers to state unemployment insurance programs. This dataset covers over 95% of all U.S. wage and salary jobs. However, it lags by 5–8 months because: - Employers have up to 90 days to report, - States must compile and transmit data to the BLS, - And the BLS conducts quality control and processing before publication. Because of this lag, the BLS publishes more frequent data via the monthly surveys, which are less precise but provide a much-needed near-term signal. Over time, the survey data is benchmarked to the QCEW, improving its accuracy and aligning the two series. Claims of "manipulation" misunderstand how decentralized the data process is. The QCEW is compiled from state-administered records, not centrally dictated figures. For manipulation to occur, it would require coordination across 50 independent state labor departments—an implausible scenario given the structure and oversight involved.
English
17
25
143
51K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
STAT
STAT@statnews·
11.8 million to lose health insurance under Senate Republican tax bill trib.al/O5Dxdo7
English
1
18
21
6.1K
michelle b. hoffmann retweetet
STAT
STAT@statnews·
Weak plans that propose alternatives to NIH funding are giving false hope to researchers. trib.al/jENz7hf
English
0
3
7
2.7K