MyNotSoSilentProtest

1.6K posts

MyNotSoSilentProtest

MyNotSoSilentProtest

@not_protest

Am wondering where my country is going

Beigetreten Ocak 2021
128 Folgt62 Follower
MyNotSoSilentProtest
MyNotSoSilentProtest@not_protest·
@rustyrockets The difficulty I have with all this one world government & control stuff is why is it aimed at Western countries? Why isn't it aimed at tribal Africa or the Middle East, why is it the compliant West? When do we activate our backbone and start to question the wrongthink?
English
0
0
0
6
Russell Brand
Russell Brand@rustyrockets·
The elites planned COVID all along...
English
52
238
769
21.7K
MyNotSoSilentProtest retweetet
Heritage Party
Heritage Party@heritagepartyuk·
Jason Barker: The UK has wasted £320,000,000,000 on net-zero since 2000. - Senedd hustings in Lampeter, Ceredigion
English
18
436
943
28K
MyNotSoSilentProtest
MyNotSoSilentProtest@not_protest·
@SamanthaTaghoy Thank you for calling it out - it's such bullshit crybully tactics, because people are now noticing and calling it what it is - dominance
English
0
0
0
16
John Cleese
John Cleese@JohnCleese·
Does this silly little man not understand that Islam is a very aggressive belief system, threatening death to anyone who does not convert to Islam The Buddhists, the Taoists, the Scottish Presbyterians, the Hindus and the Sikhs and the Confucians and the Catholics don't go around shouting about beheading people they disagree with Is this too much for your tiny little brain to take in ? Oh. The doorbell rang. The police I assume...
Gad Saad@GadSaad

Indeed. Whenever Jews are attacked (typically by Muslims), it is important to redouble our efforts to fight against Islamophobia.

English
4.4K
2.5K
19.1K
2.1M
Grok
Grok@grok·
Judaism and Islam are both Abrahamic monotheistic religions sharing the same God (Yahweh/Allah), key prophets (Abraham, Moses, Noah, etc.), and Jerusalem as a holy city. They overlap in scriptures (Quran reveres Torah stories), dietary laws (kosher/halal), circumcision, prayer, fasting, charity, and legal systems (Halakha/Sharia) guiding ethics and daily life. Islam was influenced by Judaism in structure and practice. They differ on prophets after Moses and final revelation, but aren't "totally different"—far more aligned than with non-Abrahamic faiths.
English
7
2
3
16.6K
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
Huh? .. it’s reported that McMillan cancer advise that straight white citizens … will be treated as less worthy. They will prioritise access to its welfare advice for gay, transgender and ethnic minority cancer patients. You know what to do 💣
Bernie tweet media
English
601
2.6K
7.1K
144.2K
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
After a couple of sunny days and blue skies over North West Leicestershire the Geoengineering is back this evening. How is it where you are ?
English
569
562
2K
27.7K
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
Is this the real reason Starmer couldn’t respond positively to President Trump’s request for support in the Straits of Hormuz ?
English
81
222
1.1K
89.8K
Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer@Keir_Starmer·
I’m proud of our tolerant and diverse country. I’m proud that in Trafalgar Square we celebrate all faiths. That’s British values. The comments from Nick Timothy are shameful. Kemi Badenoch should do the right thing and sack him.
English
15.9K
2.2K
11.9K
2.6M
Ben Aveling- Radmore Farm
Ben Aveling- Radmore Farm@Radmore_farm·
Keep bovaer in the news because if we don’t, it’ll be slipped into farm feeds with no benefit to the consumer whatsoever
English
129
4.5K
9.4K
80.8K
MyNotSoSilentProtest
MyNotSoSilentProtest@not_protest·
@claire_adams694 I have, but I wouldn't know where to go. I will stay and fight, but I'm not really sure how to do that either
English
0
0
0
4
Claire Adams
Claire Adams@claire_adams694·
There is a growing feeling this country is going in the wrong direction, with two-tier justice, rising sectarianism, illegal immigrants and a sense that British people’s rights are being pushed aside. Trust has broken down, and frustration is an all time high. Would you consider leaving the country?
English
191
67
465
10.1K
MyNotSoSilentProtest retweetet
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Sparky, you've identified the two-headed nature of the threat precisely. The cultural Marxists provide the intellectual framework, the language of oppression and liberation, the institutional machinery of capture. The Islamist networks provide the demographic pressure, the street power, and the political bloc voting. Neither could achieve what they are achieving alone. Together they form exactly the coalition the pieces on this thread have been documenting. Your instinct about the religion is right but the distinction is worth making precisely, not to defend the indefensible but because precision is our strongest weapon. The problem is not Muslims broadly. There are British Muslims who want nothing to do with Khomeinist ideology, Islamist politics or the destruction of British heritage. The problem is political Islam, its networks, its funding, its institutional capture, and the left that enables and amplifies it. That distinction matters because it's accurate, because it's fair, and because it makes the argument considerably harder to dismiss. The moment the argument becomes about a religion rather than an ideology and its political expression, the accusation of racism lands and the conversation ends. Name the ideology. Name the networks. Name the institutions. That's where the power lies and that's where it needs to be confronted.
English
4
15
61
1.5K
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
I’m preparing for the most important presentation I’ve done to date & in the process I’ve kidnapped an American . Thanks for all the love america ❤️🇺🇸
English
1.2K
2.8K
14.3K
481.8K
Dominic Frisby
Dominic Frisby@DominicFrisby·
Incredible luck. But also - if you put yourself out there, luck happens. Here's the film. Watch it on the big screen if you can.
English
14
24
118
9.4K
Dominic Frisby
Dominic Frisby@DominicFrisby·
250 years ago this week Adam Smith published Wealth of Nations. He explained how prosperity actually happens. Smith was so obviously right about so many things, it amazes me that we still need to not only explain, but actually make the case for his ideas today. 🧵
English
6
68
335
57.6K
The Procurement Files
The Procurement Files@procurementfile·
In 2025, Kirklees Council made 37,736 payments to 'Redacted' vendors totalling £319m.* Redacted payments include: £554k on ‘Persons Abroad’ £5.5m on ‘Trees for Climate’ £7.7m on ‘Bed & Breakfast’ £152m across 22k transactions have no category *at all* ; all detail is blank
The Procurement Files tweet mediaThe Procurement Files tweet mediaThe Procurement Files tweet media
English
190
1.7K
4.9K
376.1K
MyNotSoSilentProtest retweetet
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
The Manifesto Was the Alibi The Labour manifesto of 2024 was explicit. Britain would not rejoin the customs union. It would not rejoin the single market. There would be no return to freedom of movement. Voters were told this clearly, repeatedly, and in writing. They voted accordingly. That was the promise. Eighteen months later, Cabinet ministers are publicly calling for exactly that. David Lammy has pointed to the benefits of customs union arrangements. Wes Streeting has called for a deeper trading relationship with the EU. Peter Kyle, the Business Secretary, has said it would be crazy not to engage with the prospect of a customs union. These are not backbenchers freelancing. These are senior ministers, at the Cabinet table, arguing openly for the reversal of a commitment their party stood on at a general election. Ask yourself what that tells you about how seriously the commitment was made. Downing Street's response is instructive. Sources close to Keir Starmer did not say the ministers were wrong about the destination. They said they had not thought it through. The objection was tactical: move too fast, trigger freedom of movement, and the politics become unmanageable. The direction of travel was not disputed. Only the pace. That is the admission. Buried in a briefing designed to look like a rebuke is a concession: the government accepts the logic of deeper integration. It simply wants to manage the sequencing before the public understands what is being decided. This is not a debate about Europe. It's a question about whether the people who voted in 2024 were told the truth. The agrifood deal now being finalised illustrates the method. Ministers present it as a modest technical arrangement, a matter of reducing friction for exporters. What it actually involves is Britain operating under EU law, enforced by the European Commission and the European Court of Justice, with British taxpayers funding the privilege and British ministers having no vote on the rules they are required to follow. That is not alignment. It's accession by another name. And if you doubt that the same logic will be applied sector by sector until the architecture is complete, consider that no one in government has yet explained where it stops. The economics do not justify it. Independent analysis from the Growth Commission and the Prosperity Institute reaches the same conclusion: rejoining costs more than it returns. The case being made in Cabinet, that integration means growth, is not supported by the modelling. It's an article of faith presented as an economic argument, and the public is being asked to pay for it without being told so. And the damage extends further still. Rejoining the customs union would require Britain to abandon its trade deal with India, exit the CPTPP, and unwind agreements with Australia and New Zealand. Those arrangements took years to negotiate and represent the most tangible gains from leaving. They would be surrendered not for a gain but for a loss, in exchange for re-entering a regulatory framework in which Britain has no seat, no vote, and no means of redress. That is the deal. It should be stated plainly, because the government will not state it at all. The Downing Street briefing made one thing plain. The complaint against Lammy, Kyle and Streeting was not that they were wrong. It was that they were saying openly what the government is doing quietly. The objection was to the candour, not the content. The manifesto said one thing. The negotiations are producing another. That is not a government managing a difficult policy. It's a government that made a promise it never intended to keep, and is now hoping the public will not notice until it's too late to matter. "David Lammy has pointed to the benefits of customs union arrangements. Wes Streeting has called for a deeper trading relationship with the EU"
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet mediaJim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
149
1.2K
2.4K
47.9K